Re: [freenet-support] safe to send noderef by email

ssage by your secret key, your friend knows for sure the message is by you. Not even the NSA is known to be able to crack GPG. I think everyone who is privacy-aware must use GPG as much as he can. I am privacy aware, for that reason this is an anonymous mail. The NSA stores the text (yes they d

Re: [freenet-support] Build 1474 status and the *Freenet-bite* attack

ld have been applied to the key of a freesite or even to the key to download a particular file. I know this is no good advertizing of Freenet but this has happened. Please allow this anonymous message on the support list. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetp

Re: [freenet-support] Rant for Opennet

On 11-May-16 8:27 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Anonymous writes: (all previous text cut) Okay, you convinced me of how Darknet could add to my security. I think I understand though I'm not sure. Yet the practical problem for me stays the same, although I now would like t

Re: [freenet-support] Rant for Opennet

On 08-May-16 7:35 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Anonymous Remailer (austria) writes: > >> Arne Babenhauserheide: >> Is that a fact, am I on an 'open' Darknet, connected to Opennet >> too, less vulnerable, also towards an evil 'friend'? > > You are just as vu

[freenet-support] Rant for Opennet

Arne Babenhauserheide: > > This reasoning falls for 3 misconceptions: > > 1. You do not give your Darknet friends the key to your house. You only > make it easier for them to break in by letting them see the insides > as if they looked through the windows. In Opennet everybody can get a >

[freenet-support] Rant for Opennet - was: How to hide IP when give out noderef?

Moses wrote: > wrote: >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 03:20:07 PM Moses wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I trust my friend, but still not want them to see my IP directly on >>> the freenet web page when I give them my noderef, how to prevent my IP >>> display on their freenet? >>

[freenet-support] LE documents

In the Frost board 'freenet' an Anonymous posted a large collection of classified documents on projects, tactics and investigations of law enforcement, also on Freenet. For your convenience, the message can be found on a freesite: USK@sDg8r7Cc9lqtPBsPgn2gRGi9rEstwrVDcutExyqVE3A,tz- fi3YwH

[freenet-support] downloading freenet

i tried downloading trough the windows installer but it says i need java downloaded it with no problem and opened the installer, the next button is still not active. can i do anything to get past this? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Wondering about darknets security

This is sent anonymously, sorry if this message appears more than once. The remailer network is not very reliable. I see Matthew Toseland propagating darknet, connection to 'friends' only, in favour of opennet. Now since there is no way around the fact that 'friends' must know your IP and it

[freenet-support] 0.8

This is a Type III anonymous message sent you through the Mixminion server 'pboxlevel3'. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages through this server, please contact pbox-ad...@winstonsmith.info and your email address will promptly be added to the list of disallowed recipients. Please note

[freenet-support] commandline modify config

hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows. reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big big? is like 5k upload only. sorry if you is receive this times two, i

[freenet-support] commandline modify config

hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows. reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big big? is like 5k upload only. sorry if you is receive this times two, i

[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +, you wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:11:34AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) > >

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:08 +, you wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:49:39AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: > > > > > > You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. > > > > &g

Re: [freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:08 +, you wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:49:39AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta

Re: [freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +, you wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:11:34AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: first you have the damned thing

[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: > > > > first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on > > startup, then you fark with the store so that it

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: > > You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -0000, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > > > Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk > > SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- >

Re: [freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk

Re: [freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like it should, now

[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself. logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I tried

[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows

first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself. logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I tried

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk//

[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk

Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at

[freenet-support] Re: where to get wrapper files?

This message contains nonprinting characters, so I encoded it with Base64 before sending it to you. -BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- Message-type: binary cmVzcG9uZGluZyB0byB0aGlzIGhlcmUgaW5zdGVhZCBvZiB2aWEgZnJvc3QgYmVj YXVzZSBub3cgd2hlbiBJIHRyeSB0byBzZW5kIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBJIGdldCAi

[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Freenet 0.7 build 953

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken > > I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet > to > download new stable versions and then

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote: > > nobody at geonosis.homelinux.net wrote: > > > Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware > > will not > > support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME > > people, I > > don't have a hell

Campaigning for Open-Net [WAS Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,

5 and 0, 7] On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote: > > If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps > unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their > files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic. Tell you

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha with open-net.

RE: Campaigning for Open-Net [WAS Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,

5 and 0, 7] On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote: If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic. Tell you

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME people, I don't have a hell I suggest linux. There

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Freenet 0.7 build 953

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet to download new stable versions and then quit. I have

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha with open-net. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722 > > >--Apple-Mail-18-665665722 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=US-ASCII; > delsp=yes;

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [Tech] Open-net

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722 --Apple-Mail-18-665665722 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

gt;--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> &

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

bably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. Ok, I should rephrase "until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated" >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >>=20 >> I agree. I am will

[freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple wrote: > > Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the >download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured >as the preferred download. > > http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html > > Until Freenet 0.7 has

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

ite 0.5 content and re-insert it in 0.7 when it becomes possible. On a related note... If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace content back to the node that inserted it?

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

when it becomes possible. On a related note... If I set up a new 0.7 node, get a few refs and begin inserting content. am I as anonymous in doing so as I am in 0.5? Is there any way to trace content back to the node that inserted it? ___ Support

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured as the preferred download. http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html Until Freenet 0.7

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's

or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: =20 I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is activated, I

Re: [freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! Content

[freenet-support] (No subject)

about pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don'

Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)

pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don't have

[freenet-support] Re: Turning off or shutting down Freenet

At 03:14 a.m. 23/12/2005, you wrote: >freenetwork at ... writes: >-- snip -- >> The freenet node runs with the name "javaw.exe". But if you don't know the >> exact PID, simply killing by name >> might affect other java programs running as they all have the same process name (java or javaw). >>

[freenet-support] Scheduler in Freenet

At 03:52 a.m. 17/12/2005, I wrote: >My earlier question is a good start but I think in Freenet 0.7 it would be >good if a simple scheduler >is implemented. This should allow different configs to be used at different >time. This would mean that >we can specificy different bandwidth limits at

[freenet-support] Re: Turning off or shutting down Freenet

At 12:24 p.m. 20/12/2005, you wrote: >Bob writes: >> Right now this isn't directly possible via freenet.exe (the systray app) as >> far >> as I can tell. It does take command line args, but not a shutdown one. It >> could >Heh ignore that, I'm an idiot, obviously running freenet.exe -shutdown

[freenet-support] Turning off or shutting down Freenet with the Windows client

I believe with *nix and BSD, it is possible to stop Freeent with the shell script. Is there any way to shut down or stop Freenet with the Windows client with the command line? This would be useful for the task scheduler and such! Thanks ___ Support

[freenet-support] Scheduler in Freenet

Hi, My earlier question is a good start but I think in Freenet 0.7 it would be good if a simple scheduler is implemented. This should allow different configs to be used at different time. This would mean that we can specificy different bandwidth limits at different times. Since FreeNet is

[freenet-support] Scheduler in Freenet

Hi, My earlier question is a good start but I think in Freenet 0.7 it would be good if a simple scheduler is implemented. This should allow different configs to be used at different time. This would mean that we can specificy different bandwidth limits at different times. Since FreeNet is

[freenet-support] Turning off or shutting down Freenet with the Windows client

I believe with *nix and BSD, it is possible to stop Freeent with the shell script. Is there any way to shut down or stop Freenet with the Windows client with the command line? This would be useful for the task scheduler and such! Thanks

[freenet-support] Would someone please re-insert these files?

I've had a helluva time trying to d/l these and i'd be gratefull for a re-insert by anyone who has them. File: xpcorp.ISO Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED],t0N0QCiz0-a~LL08UL4XtA Bytes: 512360448 File: WinXPPlus.ISO Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED],gNGGF1n0TvCRjdzgtA-NRA Bytes: Thank you.

Re: [freenet-support] Re: We need your help!

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't watched the lists for some weeks now (I was on a longer business related trip). So my question: Do you still plan on switching the whole network over to UDP based transfers? Yes, although we may implement a TCP based transport

[freenet-support] freenet starts and hangs

freenet starts up, then stops with flashing '!' on the systray rabbit. Anyone know the cause of this? perhaps my settings are at fault? any advice / recomendations are welcome except for bandwidth limits which I have no choice except 512bytes / sec inbound and outbound. thanks freenet.log (in

[freenet-support] Too high probability still crippling 5095

After running 5095 for 7 hours with Java 1.5.0-rc-b63 on Linux 2.6.8.1, my node virtually stopped retrieving files, its mean routedToChoiceRank went up from 2-3 to over 100, and it kept logging these error messages until I restarted. 04.09.2004 04:33:59

Re: [freenet-support] tempDir filling up with files

On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 04:20:05AM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote: Running build 6468 on Linux 2.6.2 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 VM, I get lots of temp-*-1-* files in store/temp which don't go away after being closed. Only a node restart will delete them. The files appear and stay even if there is no

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5064, and the transfer termination attack

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:58:35AM +, Toad wrote: Freenet stable build 5064 is now available. http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar is still at 5063 (Jan 27, 2004 at 18:04 UTC). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Mysterious crashes with recent builds

Builds 5032 to 6246 on Win XP, Sun JRE 1.4.2_01-b06, 512 MB RAM, DSL connection with 1536/192 kbit/sec and dynamic IP address. Node is slowing down after several hours, then locks up. Systray Systray app shows red exclamation mark Freenet is having problems, and fproxy interface stops working.

Re: [freenet-support] Mysterious crashes with recent builds

Fixed after Windows reinstall. Sorry for false alarm. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

[freenet-support] java.lang.IllegalStateException: response already committed

I get lots of these error messages in my freenet.log (Build 627 latest CVS, IBMJava2-SDK-1.3.1, Linux 2.4.20, transient node on modem dial-up): 06.12.2002 20:36:42 (freenet.client.http.FproxyServlet, QThread-191): Error sending data to browser: java.io.IOException: Transfer interrupted (broken

[freenet-support] Obsolete tempDir warning in log

Got this in my freenet.log upon startup: ... 24.11.2002 08:10:37 (freenet.node.Main, main): loading service: mainport 24.11.2002 08:10:37 (freenet.client.http.InsertServlet, main): WARNING: fproxy tempDir not set. 24.11.2002 08:10:37 (freenet.client.http.InsertServlet, main): Set

[freenet-support] Fproxy bug: can't save freesites with Mozilla

After upgrading to build 603, I'm no longer able to save freesites with Mozilla - not even the fproxy gateway page. Save Page As ... pops up a message window The link could not be saved. The web page might have been removed or had its name changed. Another possible fproxy bug: loading the

Re: [freenet-support] Fproxy bug: can't save freesites with Mozilla

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 03:17:07PM +0100, Anonymous wrote: [fproxy bugs in build 603] Same for release 0.5.0.1 (build 526). ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

[freenet-support] fproxy patch

I've uploaded a patch to fproxy at SSK@hNO8nRj~jh8X2zrebLAXuybO3g4PAgM/progs/fproxy-encoding.patch It adds support for content encodings to fproxy. If you insert a file and specify a Info.Encoding field in the metadata, fproxy will pass this on to your browser, allowing transparent description