On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>
>
>--Apple-Mail-18-665665722
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset=US-ASCII;
> delsp=yes;
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-18-665665722
--Apple-Mail-18-665665722
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
gt;--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> &
bably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase.
Ok, I should rephrase
"until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated"
>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
>>=20
>> I agree. I am will
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple wrote:
>
> Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
>download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
>as the preferred download.
>
> http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
>
> Until Freenet 0.7 has
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
>Content-Disposition: inline
personal note: I hate pgpmime, inline may be
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Disposition: inline
personal note: I hate pgpmime,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the
download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured
as the preferred download.
http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html
Until Freenet 0.7
or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is
activated
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
=20
I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable
enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is
activated, I
: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:32:35AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!!
Content
10 matches
Mail list logo
