[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +, you wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:11:34AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store > > > > on > > > > startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow > > > > like > > > > it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself. > > > > logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I > > > > tried > > > > everything, the only thing that fixed was to delete entire store. only > > > > then > > > > would it start up. > > > > > > If you had included your wrapper.log (maybe via a pastebin, e.g. > > > code.bulix.org), I might have been able to help. > > > > What's a "wrapper"? > > > > File not found: wrapper.log > > File not found: wrapper.* > > File not found: wrapper* > > How did you install the node then? Like this: > Message-ID: > > 0) be sure you have Java version 1.5 or 1.6 (1.4 will/should work too) > - type "java -version" in a console and watch the output > > 1) download these two files into a separate directory you've created forehand: > - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar > - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-ext.jar > > 2) change to the directory they're in > > 3) rename "freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar" to "freenet.jar" > > 4) run "java -cp freenet.jar;freenet-ext.jar;%CLASSPATH%;. freenet.node.Node > > 5) report problems :) 6) update freenet.jar as needed > Do you have any other log of the node's output? not that i can find. > > > > in any freenet 0.7 directory or sub-directory > > > > > > also, why cant 0.7 have more than a few peers connected? > > > > > > It can. I have currently: > > > * Connected: 11 > > > * Backed off: 2 > > > * Disconnected: 44 > > > * Never Connected: 1 > > > > > > Often that's closer to 16. > > > > > > * Connected: 4 > > * Backed off: 1 > > * Disconnected: 37 > > * Never Connected: 31 > > > > and yes, they all have my ref. > > Maybe some of them dropped you? yeah, I hear 0.7 has a plague of that.
[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:08 +, you wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:49:39AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: > > > > > > You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > > > > > > > Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk > > > > SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- > > > > jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// > > > > Wrong answer genius, you didn't look closely enough at it. > > > > It's most definitely not the private insert key, it's the key fiw generated > > when it inserted the page. > > Then why doesn't the SSK end with PAgM? It does. Unwrap it: SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// .^ ^ .end of ssk end of 'entropy' blame fiw for handling of oneshot if something's wrong > > > > =* Inserting project (FIW 0.08) *= > > Name: temp1 > > HTL: 20 > > Edition: 0 > > Public URI: SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- > > jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// > > Start of insert: 2006-11-03 23:45:57 > > FCP host/port: 127.0.0.1:8481 > > =*==*=
Re: [freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:21:08 +, you wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:49:39AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// Wrong answer genius, you didn't look closely enough at it. It's most definitely not the private insert key, it's the key fiw generated when it inserted the page. Then why doesn't the SSK end with PAgM? It does. Unwrap it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// .^ ^ .end of ssk end of 'entropy' blame fiw for handling of oneshot if something's wrong =* Inserting project (FIW 0.08) *= Name: temp1 HTL: 20 Edition: 0 Public URI: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// Start of insert: 2006-11-03 23:45:57 FCP host/port: 127.0.0.1:8481 =*==*= ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +, you wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 03:11:34AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself. logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I tried everything, the only thing that fixed was to delete entire store. only then would it start up. If you had included your wrapper.log (maybe via a pastebin, e.g. code.bulix.org), I might have been able to help. What's a wrapper? File not found: wrapper.log File not found: wrapper.* File not found: wrapper* How did you install the node then? Like this: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0) be sure you have Java version 1.5 or 1.6 (1.4 will/should work too) - type java -version in a console and watch the output 1) download these two files into a separate directory you've created forehand: - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-ext.jar 2) change to the directory they're in 3) rename freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar to freenet.jar 4) run java -cp freenet.jar;freenet-ext.jar;%CLASSPATH%;. freenet.node.Node 5) report problems :) 6) update freenet.jar as needed Do you have any other log of the node's output? not that i can find. in any freenet 0.7 directory or sub-directory also, why cant 0.7 have more than a few peers connected? It can. I have currently: * Connected: 11 * Backed off: 2 * Disconnected: 44 * Never Connected: 1 Often that's closer to 16. * Connected: 4 * Backed off: 1 * Disconnected: 37 * Never Connected: 31 and yes, they all have my ref. Maybe some of them dropped you? yeah, I hear 0.7 has a plague of that. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: > > > > first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on > > startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like > > it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself. > > logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I tried > > everything, the only thing that fixed was to delete entire store. only then > > would it start up. > > If you had included your wrapper.log (maybe via a pastebin, e.g. > code.bulix.org), I might have been able to help. What's a "wrapper"? File not found: wrapper.log File not found: wrapper.* File not found: wrapper* in any freenet 0.7 directory or sub-directory > > > > also, why cant 0.7 have more than a few peers connected? > > It can. I have currently: > * Connected: 11 > * Backed off: 2 > * Disconnected: 44 > * Never Connected: 1 > > Often that's closer to 16. * Connected: 4 * Backed off: 1 * Disconnected: 37 * Never Connected: 31 and yes, they all have my ref.
[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: > > You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -0000, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > > > Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk > > SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- > > jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// Wrong answer genius, you didn't look closely enough at it. It's most definitely not the private insert key, it's the key fiw generated when it inserted the page. =* Inserting project (FIW 0.08) *= Name: temp1 HTL: 20 Edition: 0 Public URI: SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// Start of insert: 2006-11-03 23:45:57 FCP host/port: 127.0.0.1:8481 =*==*=
Re: [freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:33 +, you wrote: You just posted your private insert URI. Well done. On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:37:31AM -, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// Wrong answer genius, you didn't look closely enough at it. It's most definitely not the private insert key, it's the key fiw generated when it inserted the page. =* Inserting project (FIW 0.08) *= Name: temp1 HTL: 20 Edition: 0 Public URI: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// Start of insert: 2006-11-03 23:45:57 FCP host/port: 127.0.0.1:8481 =*==*= ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] latest 0.7 build blows
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:46:06 +, you wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the store on startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow like it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself. logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I tried everything, the only thing that fixed was to delete entire store. only then would it start up. If you had included your wrapper.log (maybe via a pastebin, e.g. code.bulix.org), I might have been able to help. What's a wrapper? File not found: wrapper.log File not found: wrapper.* File not found: wrapper* in any freenet 0.7 directory or sub-directory also, why cant 0.7 have more than a few peers connected? It can. I have currently: * Connected: 11 * Backed off: 2 * Disconnected: 44 * Never Connected: 1 Often that's closer to 16. * Connected: 4 * Backed off: 1 * Disconnected: 37 * Never Connected: 31 and yes, they all have my ref. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk
Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk SSK at vso2nfolaRSjmAtuCaqGy1- jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk//
[freenet-support] Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk
Open Letter to Detective Paul Krawczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] jjt8PAgM,8JcSwW9tZQtaYyD~OMUSVA/dickdetectivepaulkrawczyk// ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Freenet 0.7 build 953
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken > > I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet > to > download new stable versions and then quit. > I have the java command that starts freenet in a loop and this suffices to > update > freenet with much of the wrapper's complexity. > It worked fine. > > I would not object to an 'are you sure' message but to block the operation is > not > reasonable. Without the wrapper its reasonable > for someone to want freenet to download new jars and prep them for execution > when the > user restarts. > > Why do we _need_ this reduced flexibility? A lack of response to your question I note with disdain -- "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." - Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany. - George Bush, Talking about the Homeland Security Act and the Patriot Act. "The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." - James Madison, fourth president of the United States I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire "There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt
[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote: > > nobody at geonosis.homelinux.net wrote: > > > Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware > > will not > > support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME > > people, I > > don't have a hell > > > I suggest linux. There are many versions of it, some of them designed to > run on very poor hardware with insufficient ram. > Money is not an excuse for using a bad OS. > > Just look for a minimalist linux. There are many good window managers > like IceWM (IIRC) which won't demand much memory. > Perhaps I was not sufficiently clear. Linux is not an acceptable answer. Machine limitations are a major part of that, but other considerations that I am not at liberty to discuss are also a factor. Changing OS is not an option no matter what. I have made poor choices due to financial limitations and now am locked into those choices for at least another 9.85 years. (and yeah, it sucks to be me.) On the other hand, I have seen reports of people successfully running 0.7 on a Windows 98 computer with little difficulty. Because of this, I do not comprehend the apparent reluctance to divulge the requested help. I would consider Entropy except for the fact that it has always been slower than shit and has not released a new version in over a year
Campaigning for Open-Net [WAS Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,
5 and 0, 7] On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote: > > If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps > unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their > files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic. Tell you what, you make a good point and the last thing I want to do is slow down the work that would give so many what they want most. With this in mind, I'll shut up about open-net and not even mention it here until 12/1/06. At that time I will ask again how close it is to being deployed. (unless of course it is deployed by then !!) I will also post in frost asking others who were on this 'pestering' campaign to hold off and let you folks do your thing. > > > > > "We should all start pestering the hell outta both Ian and Toad to get > open-net deployed." > > > >
RE: Campaigning for Open-Net [WAS Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,
5 and 0, 7] On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:54:12 -0400, you wrote: If you pester anyone too much it can be self defeating. Perhaps unintentionally as they consume much time deleting your messages from their files. Or intentionally if they choose to block the excesses traffic. Tell you what, you make a good point and the last thing I want to do is slow down the work that would give so many what they want most. With this in mind, I'll shut up about open-net and not even mention it here until 12/1/06. At that time I will ask again how close it is to being deployed. (unless of course it is deployed by then !!) I will also post in frost asking others who were on this 'pestering' campaign to hold off and let you folks do your thing. We should all start pestering the hell outta both Ian and Toad to get open-net deployed. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:39:59 +0200, you wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, Do NOT suggest switching to Linux, I've tried it and my hardware will not support it's demands. Again, this is a matter of money that unlike SOME people, I don't have a hell I suggest linux. There are many versions of it, some of them designed to run on very poor hardware with insufficient ram. Money is not an excuse for using a bad OS. Just look for a minimalist linux. There are many good window managers like IceWM (IIRC) which won't demand much memory. Perhaps I was not sufficiently clear. Linux is not an acceptable answer. Machine limitations are a major part of that, but other considerations that I am not at liberty to discuss are also a factor. Changing OS is not an option no matter what. I have made poor choices due to financial limitations and now am locked into those choices for at least another 9.85 years. whine(and yeah, it sucks to be me.)/whine On the other hand, I have seen reports of people successfully running 0.7 on a Windows 98 computer with little difficulty. Because of this, I do not comprehend the apparent reluctance to divulge the requested help. I would consider Entropy except for the fact that it has always been slower than shit and has not released a new version in over a year ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Freenet 0.7 build 953
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:25:16 -0400, you wrote: On Wednesday 23 August 2006 15:19, Matthew Toseland wrote: - Don't start the updater if the wrapper is broken I have problems with this one. I do not run the wrapper - I do want freenet to download new stable versions and then quit. I have the java command that starts freenet in a loop and this suffices to update freenet with much of the wrapper's complexity. It worked fine. I would not object to an 'are you sure' message but to block the operation is not reasonable. Without the wrapper its reasonable for someone to want freenet to download new jars and prep them for execution when the user restarts. Why do we _need_ this reduced flexibility? A lack of response to your question I note with disdain -- An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland. - Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany. - George Bush, Talking about the Homeland Security Act and the Patriot Act. The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home. - James Madison, fourth president of the United States I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire There are four boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Would someone please re-insert these files?
I've had a helluva time trying to d/l these and i'd be gratefull for a re-insert by anyone who has them. File: xpcorp.ISO Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED],t0N0QCiz0-a~LL08UL4XtA Bytes: 512360448 File: WinXPPlus.ISO Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED],gNGGF1n0TvCRjdzgtA-NRA Bytes: Thank you. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
