about others. The publicly available seed nodes have been very
busy lately. If possible try to get a friend to give you a reference to their node
instead.
This is new data to me. What's backed off?
Thanks.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Toad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:14:39AM -0700, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/GPL.txt
Hops To Live: 15
Error: Route Not Found
Attempts were made to contact 0 nodes.
0 were totally unreachable.
0 restarted.
0 cleanly
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:22:36PM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
It's 547 MB gzipped.
Errr... you could try bzip2'ing it.
Seems like an exercise in futility, but if you insist. It was more than
2GB to start with.
Anyway, hop over to #freenet
-rw-rw-r--1 freenet freenet 547933288 Jan 17 11:38 freenet.log.gz
547 MB. How do you want it?
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:16:49AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Exactly what I'm seeing. When I stop
It's 547 MB gzipped.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
1529 East Palmdale Blvd Suite 200
Palmdale, CA 93550
(661) 538-2028
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:04:13PM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
-rw-rw-r--1 freenet freenet 547933288 Jan
Exactly what I'm seeing. When I stop/restart it'll run for give-or-take
a few hours, 48 hours then usage will go to 0, 0ms CurrentRoutingTime.
Glad I'm not alone.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
1529 East Palmdale Blvd Suite 200
Palmdale, CA 93550
(661) 538-2028
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:16:49AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Exactly what I'm seeing. When I stop/restart it'll run for give-or-take
a few hours, 48 hours then usage will go to 0, 0ms CurrentRoutingTime.
What exact build number is this?
543
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:03:07AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Finally looks like my announcement problem fixed itself. Now I'm
seeing the same problem I was having a couple months ago on build 529.
The node chugs along merrily until
/24.186.167.217:11991 0.58824056 2 8 3 (37%) 9 secs. longer 5 secs. ago 527
false 2
tcp/check.ath.cx:41552 0.4702611 2 39 31 (79%) 5 secs. longer 9 secs. ago 523
false 17
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, it's REALLY difficult to read your responses without
whitespace between your text and the text you're replying to.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:36:09AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
I'm about ready to hang it up
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:40:53AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
That's the seednodes.ref I was using before. Nothing but connections
When? Hawk was down for a while recently, which would have led to the
seednodes.ref not working.
Just last week
100% sure. Can you not telnet to 209.221.197.10:13570?
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
1529 East Palmdale Blvd Suite 200
Palmdale, CA 93550
(661) 538-2028
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:59:13PM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
This node's
This node's still not announcing.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:38:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Permanent Node
.
Jan 1, 2003 7:32:22 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, QThread-107): Found
3 announcement targets for this node.
I was up and rocking on 529 (I think) until the machine took a
crap. Finally got it reinstalled but it's not announcing itself.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
14 matches
Mail list logo
