about others. The publicly available seed nodes have been very
busy lately. If possible try to get a friend to give you a reference to their node
instead.
This is new data to me. What's backed off?
Thanks.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Toad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:14:39AM -0700, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/GPL.txt
Hops To Live: 15
Error: Route Not Found
Attempts were made to contact 0 nodes.
0 were totally unreachable.
0 restarted.
0 cleanly
-rw-rw-r--1 freenet freenet 547933288 Jan 17 11:38 freenet.log.gz
547 MB. How do you want it?
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:16:49AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Exactly what I'm seeing. When I stop
It's 547 MB gzipped.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
1529 East Palmdale Blvd Suite 200
Palmdale, CA 93550
(661) 538-2028
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:04:13PM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
-rw-rw-r--1 freenet freenet 547933288 Jan
Exactly what I'm seeing. When I stop/restart it'll run for give-or-take
a few hours, 48 hours then usage will go to 0, 0ms CurrentRoutingTime.
Glad I'm not alone.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
1529 East Palmdale Blvd Suite 200
Palmdale, CA 93550
(661) 538-2028
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:16:49AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Exactly what I'm seeing. When I stop/restart it'll run for give-or-take
a few hours, 48 hours then usage will go to 0, 0ms CurrentRoutingTime.
What exact build number is this?
543
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:03:07AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
Finally looks like my announcement problem fixed itself. Now I'm
seeing the same problem I was having a couple months ago on build 529.
The node chugs along merrily until
/24.186.167.217:11991 0.58824056 2 8 3 (37%) 9 secs. longer 5 secs. ago 527
false 2
tcp/check.ath.cx:41552 0.4702611 2 39 31 (79%) 5 secs. longer 9 secs. ago 523
false 17
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, it's REALLY difficult to read your responses without
whitespace between your text and the text you're replying to.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:36:09AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
I'm about ready to hang it up
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 10:40:53AM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
That's the seednodes.ref I was using before. Nothing but connections
When? Hawk was down for a while recently, which would have led to the
seednodes.ref not working.
Just last week
100% sure. Can you not telnet to 209.221.197.10:13570?
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
1529 East Palmdale Blvd Suite 200
Palmdale, CA 93550
(661) 538-2028
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:59:13PM -0800, Chris Linstruth wrote:
This node's
This node's still not announcing.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:38:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Permanent Node
.
Jan 1, 2003 7:32:22 PM (freenet.node.states.announcing.Announcing, QThread-107): Found
3 announcement targets for this node.
I was up and rocking on 529 (I think) until the machine took a
crap. Finally got it reinstalled but it's not announcing itself.
--
Chris Linstruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QNET
13 matches
Mail list logo
