Thus spake Rob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09/05/05 21:05]:
: This doesn't happen when running a Freenet node logged on my machine as
: root. Another clue.
Likely permissions problem. Give the user you're trying to run Freenet as
write permissions on the directory it's complaining about.
Thus spake Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [03/05/05 11:02]:
: Why can't you just reduce the bandwidth limit? (Of course, that can't be
: done on the fly either..)
Not via Freenet, but via system firewalls it can.
___
Support mailing list
Thus spake Brian T. Schellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01:58:46 11/12/03:
: Why not just install JDK 1.4.1? It seems to work fine under FreeBSD 4.9;
: surely it would work under 5.1 as well?
I'm using JDK1.4 under 5-CURRENT, but can vouch that it works under
5.1-RELEASE just as well.
Side note,
Thus spake Brian T. Schellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01:57:43 11/12/03:
: Yeah, but the browser is irrelalvent; 'tis fproxy that handles the freenet
: stuff for the browswer, and *it* knows about freenet.
:
: Not that it's likely to do better the fuqid . . . but it might be interesting
: to
Thus spake The Babbler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06:24:30 11/11/03:
: I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel.
:
: Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads 100%; in fact, the load
: numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not
:
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16:34:02 11/11/03:
: Anyone running under 5-CURRENT? It's good to see that it's working for
: someone, just wondering if perhaps all the threading changes have made
: a difference.
:
: Or maybe my node is just overloaded...
:
: if you've got only
I've been noticing some accessibility problems with my freenet install
over the past couple of weeks. Figuring that it was just a fresh node,
and I'd done a number of restarts, I didn't bother looking into it. But
sometime yesterday, since I'd been up for almost five days, I poked a bit
further
