Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-22 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | No, if you can do that, then you can portscan for Freenet nodes. That's | a REALLY bad idea. You need to use some sort of seednodes mechanism. Why is that a bad idea? If a government is paranoid enough, they can just put devices all

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zenon Panoussis wrote: | | | David Masover wrote: | | Of course, if you don't own | your own computer, how can you trust it? One-way trust. Suppose my bro | trusts me, but I don't trust him, I have root, and he wants Freenet. | | | You don't need

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | java -cp freenet.jar freenet.Version on a command line? Freenet: Fred 0.5 (protocol STABLE-1.50) build 5084 (last good build: 5083) | Show me it. Same as what you've been seeing in the logs, pretty much. Since it dies now same as ever.

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 TLD wrote: | what's your mainport.allowedHosts= setting, and what's the IP of the | computer you're trying to access from? It's sane. Or you tell me: http://slaphack.com/freenet.conf http://slaphack.com/freenet.log -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [freenet-support] In need of opinions and ideas

2004-07-21 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) makes some valid points. I didn't feel like quoting the whole thing, but... They are all moot if there's a big banner inserted onto every page which points to an explanation of freenet (as well as a disclaimer somewhere), and

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zenon Panoussis wrote: | | Toad wrote: | | The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces | the useability of freenet | | | Of course. There are ways to implement search, however. Sooner or later | somebody will implement a good spider based

Re: [freenet-support] Anyone got Blackdown on

2004-07-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | I need the output of: | java -version 21 | head -n 1 | sed s/java version \\(.*\)\/\1/ | on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL where the | JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta). 1.4.1 I'm on Blackdown, and

Re: [freenet-support] Load

2004-07-20 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote: | |Unfortunately, I can't work on this at all right now. My freenet node |looks fine, only I get a connection close from FProxy the instant I try |connecting -- that is, 0

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Stunnel Freenet

2004-07-16 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mika Hirvonen wrote: [...] | case, you'll be better off running an another node locally. Speaking of which: I am leaving Freenet running on my router, in the hopes that FProxy will eventually start responding, and that when it does, it will

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Stunnel Freenet

2004-07-16 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weiliang Zhang wrote: | David Masover wrote: | Mika Hirvonen wrote: | [...] | | case, you'll be better off running an another node locally. | | Speaking of which: | | Would it be worthwhile to also run a transient node on my local machine, | instead

Re: [freenet-support] How much download?

2004-07-12 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | Changing bandwidth limits on the fly may be quite difficult, but we'll get | around to it eventually.. :) Really? Would it be feasable to do an Apache-style graceful restart? ~ (Since files that are really too big should have a

Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems

2004-07-12 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report... Unless it's causing my slowness, blackdown works fine for me. I'd rather be using Kaffe, but I've had issues making that work on Gentoo. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-11 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Oliveri wrote: [...] | days. Did you leave it running while properly opening up the port it uses | for incoming connections in your firewall (if needed)? Yes. It's on the firewall machine, which really only does NAT anyway. | I have an 2.5G

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-11 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs? I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable. Don't know RNF or DNF from Dionsaur. 5-10 connections, 2 or 3 loaded before the browser timed out (guess). |

[freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now? I'm getting lots of pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even though the browser is on another

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael R. Stork wrote: | U, no offense, but are you just being intentionally argumentative ? No, just trying to clear up a possible misconception. Some people have this idea that there's some huge difference between a personal computer and a

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread David Masover
so. If they're curious, then they'll ask about it. But if someone is asking for an answer to a very specific question, then turning it into If someone asks Does anyone know how to make crispy bagels in the microwave and I suggest using a toaster instead for that particular task, then I'm not

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread David Masover
If it's a very old computer it may not be able to run Freenet adequately. It should. I know it isn't. Freenet uses 100% CPU wherever I run it. Heh. Well, not everyone who runs Freenet is as paranoid as some of our users are. :) They are patient enough with its slowness to be that

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael R. Stork wrote: | making beef stew. And you telling them that electric is no good, that | before they do anything else they need to rip out their stove and | install a gas one. Oh and beef isn't good for them anyway so here's this | really

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-15 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael R. Stork wrote: | David Masover wrote: | | an excuse to tell them how ignorant they are for not doing it your way | | I was suggesting my way. I wasn't implying that anyone was stupid. | | Perhaps it wasn't you that made the first comment

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-14 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Madeline Brubaker wrote: | Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security | Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to Do yourself a favor, and don't run that software. Yes, I'm a Linux nut. My attitude towards Windows

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-14 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael R. Stork wrote: [...] | a hardware firewall and NAT. I wouldn't connect any PC direct to a | cable/DSL line. I would. A linux one. Or better, a BSD one. With daily updates. The firewall really wouldn't help all that much for me, although I

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-14 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a |software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want |to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...] | | | What, a

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-14 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Oliveri wrote: | On Monday 14 June 2004 08:45 am, David Masover wrote: | |Madeline Brubaker wrote: || Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security || Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to | |Do yourself a favor

Re: [freenet-support] norton firewall

2004-06-14 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicholas Sturm wrote: | Dear | |Madeline Brubaker: | | | Please excuse the nuts around here that seem to be as much of a | problem as Apple lovers once were. Ooh! Ooh! I smell a rant! Please excuse my response to being called a nut. | I don't

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet crashes DSL modem

2004-05-01 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | I know of two nat routers that work well under the load of freenet: What about a cheap Linux box? 200 mHz + linux 2.6 + iptables works well for me -- although I usually just run the freenet node on that box so that it can be permanent... -BEGIN

Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064

2004-01-30 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and will probably continue to use it