Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5093

2004-09-02 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 12:24, Heine Laursen wrote: Open connections say's Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 92 (55/37/200) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 96 (30/66) Data waiting to be transmitted/received 83 KiB/None Amount of data transmitted/received over

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5093

2004-09-01 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 22:14, Heine Laursen wrote: I'm sure you are trying to do your best. But i'm growing tired of trying to connect to freenet. Do you leave your node running 24/7? How big is your datastore? (Huge datastore means your node gets a reputation for being able to satisfy

RE: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure where your 'village' is but here it works much the same way actually. But the problem is that there is no machine that can just tell us what your intent was. So what your intent was has to be inferred from your actions and

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:35, Toad wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:31:11PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote: On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure where your 'village' is but here it works much the same way actually. But the problem

Re: [freenet-support] Route Not Found

2004-08-01 Thread Edward J. Huff
I also see RNF problems on 5088. Over the past 12 hours: 1547 requests for CHK keys started. Most of these should exist. 440 Data Not Found. 31 successful. 1072 Route Not Found 4 were in progress at the time. On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 10:30, Heine Laursen wrote: Mika Hirvonen wrote: Heine

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5087

2004-07-28 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 06:06, Jano wrote: Solved it changing the -Xmx128m to -Xmx256m. I suppose this can be a general problem, I'm running stable without any tweaks since a month or so. In the good side, two minutes running and I can see all the activelinks, where the previous build

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5087

2004-07-28 Thread Edward J. Huff
transmitted/received over currently open connections 162 MiB/118 MiB Total amount of data transmitted/received 231 MiB/149 MiB Uptime 5 hours 43 minutes Current upstream bandwidth usage 13865 bytes/second (138.6%) On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:32:12AM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote: On Wed, 2004-07-28

Re: [freenet-support] Where is the best place to search freenet-support archives?

2004-06-01 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 14:28, tripolar wrote: Hello I have been using Gmane to search the freenet archives with no luck?? httpnews.gmane.orggmane.network.freenet.support I have put in java lang exception java.io.IOException: Too many open files java.io.IOException without any hits. Any

Re: Re[2]: [freenet-support] First freenet start, first freenet bugs

2004-05-26 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: version 0.5.2.8 on win2k server and I install it by just clicking on freenet- webinstall.exe . What build number? That sounds like a very old version. You need to upgrade it to build number 5082. See instructions for upgrading on the

Re: [freenet-support] mailing list subscriber email should bypass spam blockers

2004-05-18 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 11:17, Toad wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: Please, please, please FIX this and allow direct MTA connections from subscribed members only. Having to go thru the ISP mail server is a MAJOR privacy concern for me (I know

Re: [freenet-support] mailing list subscriber email should bypass spam blockers

2004-05-17 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:53, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: Please, please, please FIX this and allow direct MTA connections from subscribed members only. Testing to see if I can send mail in. My email is hosted on my own server. I have a send permitted from record in the DNS for my domain.

Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings

2004-03-08 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 19:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Joe I have a similar situation to you. I first started using Freenet a few months ago. I use Fuqid to retrieve content. When I first set it up Freenet actually worked. Today, however, I have a queue of partially retrieved items

Re: [freenet-support] Update

2004-01-31 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 01:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just made a update to 6457, and now my node is some kind of doomed... :/ For some reason the node removed all entrys from the routing table and also does not get any new entrys. At least it did not stop working, since it gets enough

Re: [freenet-support] Install on Linux Fedora

2004-01-20 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 09:18, Doug wrote: I have installed Sun's 1.4.1 version of Java, then ran the start script and get a Done response. Then nice - Java not found. Possibly due to my inexperience with Linux, but can anyone prompt me along? It doesn't appear that Java is running. Either

Re: [freenet-support] What things of Freenet eats the most memory

2004-01-19 Thread Edward J. Huff
5061 seems to have a memory leak. I gave it 512M and it still got up to 450M (I restarted it so it wouldn't run out). Routing remains an unsolved problem... Read freenet-dev on gmane for more info. -- Ed Huff On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 20:52, Someone wrote: Hi, after some switching of

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5052

2004-01-09 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 14:32, Niklas Bergh wrote: Freenet stable build 5052 is now available. Changelog: * tfAbsoluteMaxThreads config parameter added. tfAbsoluteMaxThreads will allow you to limit maximum number of threads the YThreadFactory will spawn. Default value is 500 threads.

Re: [freenet-support] Bug or Feature?

2004-01-02 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 12:14, Rudolf Krist wrote: Hello, after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only contained nodes with the Build Nr. = 6415. Is that a new feature? Or was it not intended? Yes, users of the unstable build are expected to upgrade daily. -- Ed

Re: [freenet-support] Suddenly unable to connect to network

2003-11-30 Thread Edward J. Huff
. Get the latest seednodes.ref file http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref and replace your copy of seednodes.ref. Right now there are 69 distinct nodes listed there. -- Edward J. Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Re[2]: [freenet-support] unable to start after disk filled

2003-11-24 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 10:34, Aureliano Rama wrote: I think as well that he should get a new copy of freenet.jar, that surely doesn't hurt nor cancel any previous setting as long as he doesn't overwrite the config file. However it's a bit strange that a disk full could lead to a damaged jar.

RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall.

2003-11-16 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 03:37, Kevin Bennett wrote: I only used the -a switch. If I add -n as well it becomes: TCP 0.0.0.0:49247 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING. and many TCP myIP:49247foreignIP:port ESTABLISHED ... I suppose that 0.0.0.0:0 means the same thing as 0.0.0.0:*,

RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall.

2003-11-15 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 14:06, Kevin Bennett wrote: According to netstat -a, 49247 is listening: TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0

Re: [freenet-support] Newbie: can't start Freenet (Could not initialize network I/O system)

2003-11-15 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 18:47, Shen Ming Xuan wrote: Hello, I have just downloaded installed Freenet 0.5.2.7, started it and got this error on freenet startup: - Could not initialize network I/O system! Exiting

Re: [freenet-support] ERROR : String index out of range: 24

2003-11-15 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 05:08, Tapio Valli wrote: Hi, I am upgraded to the latest stable build today and now when I try to connect to my node via local client browser to :, all I get is a blank page and following ERRORS in the freenet.log : Nov 9, 2003 12:00:03 PM

Re: [freenet-support] error determining this node's physical address(es)

2003-11-15 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is from my log ** Reducing rtMaxNodes to 15 - was too high for maxNodeConnections 60 because we keep an idle conn open to each node. Nov 8, 2003 10:38:01 AM (freenet.node.Node, main, ERROR): Reducing rtMaxNodes to 15 -

Re: [freenet-support] Installation redux

2003-11-07 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:27, Phil Rabne wrote: I tried inserting the suggested two lines as follows after the #!bin/sh comment: PATH=/philtr/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2./jre/bin/java:$PATH export PATH Of course I'm assuming that 'jre' stands for, java runtime environment (of