Re: Migration path, please! (Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0, 5 and 0, 7

2006-08-25 Thread fwolff33
Juiceman wrote: With 10 connections, the data that could intercepted by one attacker is roughly 10%. The problem is the attacker doesn't know how many connections you have, so you could just be passing on data from any number of connections you have. It's currently trivialy easy to

[freenet-support] Snapshots

2004-05-17 Thread Fwolff33
It seems so, as if the snapshots do not get updated anymore. At least the unstable-latest.jar (or similiar, the file which gets downloaded from the update script) is still version 60103, although 60105 was already announced. ___ Support mailing list

Re: [freenet-support] various problems

2004-04-28 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 17:40 MEZ schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 16:26 MEZ schreibt Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As soon as a new build with your logging improvements gets out I will report what is loged then, thanks for your help so far. :)

Re: [freenet-support] various problems

2004-04-28 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Mi, 28. Apr. 2004 14:28 MEZ schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The Error Action cannot be taken after termination does not happen anymore after the update to 60079, strange. (and nice ;) ) Have to correct me, they reappeared. For some reason not one of them occured at first, so I

Re: [freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

2004-04-28 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 15:44 MEZ schreibt Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote: Current upstream bandwidth usage  164677 bytes/second (164.7%) [...] average out to no more than the target. HOWEVER, there is a hard limit of 140% of

Re: [freenet-support] various problems

2004-04-27 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 15:25 MEZ schreibt Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:16:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 13:03 MEZ schreibt Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There seems to be a whole bunch of different temp files

[freenet-support] various problems

2004-04-26 Thread Fwolff33
I wanted to report, that I get currently a lot of the following error messages: Action cannot be taken after termination java.lang.Exception: debug Please close() me manually in finalizer: Key: *removed* Buffer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : *removed*:temp:*removed* New: true ( 0 of 262460 read)

Re: [freenet-support] The Freenet Experience

2004-04-23 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Fr, 23. Apr. 2004 5:45 MEZ schreibt Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Freenet People, I'd like to hear about your experience with and uses for freenet. I'm interested in those that use freenet. How usable is it? What is your setup? What kind of performance do you get? What kinds

Re: [freenet-support] OutOfMemoryError

2004-03-18 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 16. März 2004 17:28 MEZ schreibt Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fwolff said: And to the philosophy of some devs: RAM is cheap New SDRAM will be detected only with half of it's normal size or even not detected at all in old computers When I was having problems with

Re: [freenet-support] OutOfMemoryError

2004-03-14 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Sa, 13. März 2004 3:52 MEZ schreibt Chris Gentile [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am also struggling with 5074. Here is my freenet.conf: ipAddress=www.gentilehome.com listenPort=27882 seedNodes=seednodes.ref outputBandwidthLimit=48000 storeSize=3G overloadHigh=0.6 overloadLow=0.4 I've

Re: [freenet-support] Webinterface with 6495

2004-03-05 Thread Fwolff33
I will try another update now, but I wanted to report this, since I have not read of a similar problem with that build until now in the support group. It failed, too. Just now I run that build without the webinterface, but I will switch back to the old build, soon. It works again in 6 :)

[freenet-support] Webinterface with 6495

2004-03-04 Thread Fwolff33
I yesterday executed the update.sh script and got that way the 6495 build. But I had to reinstall the old build a hour later, because with 6495 build the webinterface stopped working. At least I could not access it with any network computer I tried, and that worked all builds before. I cannot

Re: [freenet-support] Webinterface with 6495

2004-03-04 Thread Fwolff33
I will try another update now, but I wanted to report this, since I have not read of a similar problem with that build until now in the support group. It failed, too. Just now I run that build without the webinterface, but I will switch back to the old build, soon.

Re: [freenet-support] Re: E-Mail nicht zustellbar

2004-02-15 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom So, 15. Feb. 2004 21:43 MEZ schreibt Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 15 Feb 2004 at 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Die E-Mail, die Sie am Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:14:02 -0500 an [EMAIL PROTECTED] gesendet haben, konnte nicht zugestellt werden, da die E-Mail Adresse

RE: RE: [freenet-support] Crashes with 6469

2004-02-13 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 10. Feb. 2004 15:57 MEZ schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In einer eMail vom Di, 10. Feb. 2004 12:44 MEZ schreibt Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is prbably not causing you trouble.. I have committed some logging changes that will better say what the cause is now (will

[freenet-support] Crashes with 6469

2004-02-10 Thread Fwolff33
After updating to 6469 I always get this log entry right after starting the node, before the first request is made. 12:13:07 Size was wrong reading in SimpleDataObjectStore Until now I was also not able to run the node for longer then one or two hours, while it before would run for more then

RE: RE: [freenet-support] Crashes with 6469

2004-02-10 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 10. Feb. 2004 12:44 MEZ schreibt Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is prbably not causing you trouble.. I have committed some logging changes that will better say what the cause is now (will incluse a callstack and what the atual sizes are). Let me know what it says.

[freenet-support] problems with rate limiting

2004-02-02 Thread Fwolff33
After upgrading to 6459 I got this situation: Current routingTime 18ms Current messageSendTimeRequest 0ms Pooled threads running jobs 22 (20%) Current upstream bandwidth usage 211 bytes/second (2,1%) Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load):

[freenet-support] Update

2004-01-31 Thread Fwolff33
Just made a update to 6457, and now my node is some kind of doomed... :/ For some reason the node removed all entrys from the routing table and also does not get any new entrys. At least it did not stop working, since it gets enough inbound connections, but...I really loved that routing table

Re: [freenet-support] Update

2004-01-31 Thread Fwolff33
thx ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Update

2004-01-31 Thread Fwolff33
thx ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

2004-01-09 Thread Fwolff33
I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken: Current upstream bandwidth usage 14576 bytes/second (145,8%) And the node is not QueryRejecting or something like that and the load