On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the i
Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
with open-net.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freene
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Ian Clarke wrote:
>On 24 Aug 2006, at 12:01, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote:
>> Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
>> to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
>> network. There might be now, but the idea of the way
Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
with open-net.
