Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1345

2011-02-07 Thread Ian Clarke
), but it's still important to fix it. Are you sure its wise to give people so little time to upgrade for what appears to be a minor fix? Ian. -- Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: i...@freenetproject.org ___ Support mailing list Support

Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?

2010-10-18 Thread Ian Clarke
a little time to understand what is being debated before they start ranting. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, SenseArray Email: i...@sensearray.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org

Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?

2010-10-18 Thread Ian Clarke
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Ray Jones crawlz...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:11 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: It would be really helpful if people could spend a little time to understand what is being debated before they start ranting. Try again. I subscribed to this list

Re: [freenet-support] Straw poll: Should Freenet require Javascript?

2010-10-18 Thread Ian Clarke
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Ray Jones crawlz...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:57 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: And this is the problem. If you admit that you don't understand the issues then why express any opinion at all until you do? Because as I began learning about

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-05 Thread Ian Clarke
running on its current port for those that prefer it. So anti-Javascript luddites like you will be free to remain in the dark ages if you want to ;-P Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, SenseArray Email: i...@sensearray.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 ___ Support mailing

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Non-english windows users: does it pick up your language or do you need to set it?

2009-06-13 Thread Ian Clarke
language? And does it pick up the system locale in the first place? IIRC the language selection isn't very obvious? ___ Devl mailing list d...@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Ian Clarke CEO

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Request for proofreading: Announcing donation from Google

2009-05-12 Thread Ian Clarke
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: 7th May, 2009 - Another big donation! How about: Google makes a second donation to Freenet! Everything else looks good. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: i...@uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
ward this message on to any other relevant forums (such as > > on-Freenet message boards). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ian. > > > > -- > > Ian Clarke > > CEO, Uprizer Labs > > Email: ian at uprizer.com > > Ph: +1 512

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
, but if you can spare anything I'd ask that you visit our donation page at http://freenetproject.org/donate.html, and contribute whatever you can. Please also forward this message on to any other relevant forums (such as on-Freenet message boards). Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
, but if you can spare anything I'd ask that you visit our donation page at http://freenetproject.org/donate.html, and contribute whatever you can. Please also forward this message on to any other relevant forums (such as on-Freenet message boards). Thanks, Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: i...@uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1195 (and warning)

2009-01-10 Thread Ian Clarke
stage. You should look into GWT for this. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1195 (and warning)

2009-01-10 Thread Ian Clarke
for the next stage. You should look into GWT for this. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: i...@uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

[freenet-support] We need a new French translator

2009-01-01 Thread Ian Clarke
s someone in Belgium, Canada, or some other French-speaking country that doesn't suffer from France's legal stupidity around P2P. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 Fax: +1 512 276 6674

[freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-01 Thread Ian Clarke
Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does anyone understand what problem he is running into here? Ian. On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Don Lee wrote: > The installer should not attempt an install if there's a serious problem. > > I don't see a fix for this and I've

Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-01 Thread Ian Clarke
Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does anyone understand what problem he is running into here? Ian. On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Don Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The installer should not attempt an install if there's a serious problem. I don't see a fix for this

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Ian Clarke
allow small groups to connect without connecting to > everyone else. That is not true. Freenet 0.7 is designed to form one global network, not multiple independent networks consisting of small groups. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | p

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread Ian Clarke
without connecting toeveryone else. That is not true.  Freenet 0.7 is designed to form one global network, not multiple independent networks consisting of small groups.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really doesn't belong here. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: &l

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Clarke
first world war. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/2006

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Clarke
. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really doesn't belong here.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___ Support mailing list Support

[freenet-support] 0.7 FProxy oddities

2006-04-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4 Apr 2006, at 21:12, Joel Salomon wrote: > On 4/5/06, Joel Salomon wrote: >>> What build did you see this in? >> >> How do I tell? > > Never mind, I found it -- #616. Yeah, I think it was fixed in 620. Ian.

Re: [freenet-support] 0.7 FProxy oddities

2006-04-04 Thread Ian Clarke
Bug reports belong in the bug tracking system :-) http://bugs.freenetproject.org/ What build did you see this in? I think this one was supposed to have been fixed about 12 hours ago. Ian. On 4 Apr 2006, at 20:04, Joel Salomon wrote: Bug report: On occasion,

Re: [freenet-support] 0.7 FProxy oddities

2006-04-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4 Apr 2006, at 21:12, Joel Salomon wrote: On 4/5/06, Joel Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What build did you see this in? How do I tell? Never mind, I found it -- #616. Yeah, I think it was fixed in 620. Ian. ___ Support mailing list

[freenet-support] Plan for 0.7a release - your help needed

2006-04-03 Thread Ian Clarke
Ok, the announcement text is looking good, but still needs more feedback, so please check it out: http://wiki.freenetproject.org/ZeroPointSevenAnnouncementDraft The plan is to send this to the announcement mailing list, and add it to the news section of the website, probably mid-afternoon

[freenet-support] Disk cache

2006-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4/1/06, van2 at vipmail.hu wrote: > I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant > disk access. I don't think disk drives wear out that quickly, and lots of software writes to the disk constantly. That being said, the default log level in testnet Freenet is

Re: [freenet-support] Disk cache

2006-04-01 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant disk access. I don't think disk drives wear out that quickly, and lots of software writes to the disk constantly. That being said, the default log level in testnet

[freenet-support] Thanks Matt

2006-03-31 Thread Ian Clarke
On 31 Mar 2006, at 20:08, John Meeks wrote: > This isn't about *technical* support, I just wanted to tell Matthew > thanks > for working on this project. The US government is really scaring > me and > I'm glad someone's working on this. You're doing a great job man. > > One question I have

Re: [freenet-support] Thanks Matt

2006-03-31 Thread Ian Clarke
On 31 Mar 2006, at 20:08, John Meeks wrote: This isn't about *technical* support, I just wanted to tell Matthew thanks for working on this project. The US government is really scaring me and I'm glad someone's working on this. You're doing a great job man. One question I have is that the

[freenet-support] Error in Stable version

2006-03-27 Thread Ian Clarke
There are instructions for unsubscribing at the bottom of every email. Ian. On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:41, Tony Stevens wrote: > > For God's Sake Man - FREENET is all about Privacy! There must be > some way in hell that you can take me off of the mailing list? > > Please I am tired of

Re: [freenet-support] Error in Stable version

2006-03-27 Thread Ian Clarke
There are instructions for unsubscribing at the bottom of every email. Ian. On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:41, Tony Stevens wrote: For God's Sake Man - FREENET is all about Privacy! There must be some way in hell that you can take me off of the mailing list? Please I am tired of being

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Project

2006-02-25 Thread Ian Clarke
Sorry Dick, but I don't have time to solve your problems either - certainly not when you inform me about them in such a rude way. In future, you might find when reporting bugs to people that you get a better response if you don't insult them in the process. Ian. On 25 Feb 2006, at 09:14,

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Project

2006-02-25 Thread Ian Clarke
Sorry Dick, but I don't have time to solve your problems either - certainly not when you inform me about them in such a rude way. In future, you might find when reporting bugs to people that you get a better response if you don't insult them in the process. Ian. On 25 Feb 2006, at 09:14,

[freenet-support] traffic shaping

2006-02-17 Thread Ian Clarke
On 17 Feb 2006, at 22:51, Greg Steffenson wrote: > In what way is Tor centralized? I was under the > impression that your traffic was routed through a > largely random sequence of Tor servers... is there > some communication with a central server in addition > to that? Who gives you the list of

[freenet-support] seednodes.ref

2005-10-25 Thread Ian Clarke
I just filed bug #8: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=8 We should distribute files from emu now that sourceforge is deliberately limiting the speed of download from their web servers. To avoid any bandwidth crunch, we should link through Coral Cache (see http://coralcdn.com/).

[freenet-support] V e r y s l o o o o o w download from freenetproject.org/snapshots

2005-10-25 Thread Ian Clarke
On 23 Oct 2005, at 18:38, m0rtal frei wrote: > Hello Ian, > > Sunday, October 23, 2005, 4:47:19 PM, you wrote: > > >> Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the >> download of large files from their web servers. We need to address >> this but haven't got around to it yet.

Re: [freenet-support] seednodes.ref

2005-10-25 Thread Ian Clarke
I just filed bug #8: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=8 We should distribute files from emu now that sourceforge is deliberately limiting the speed of download from their web servers. To avoid any bandwidth crunch, we should link through Coral Cache (see

[freenet-support] V e r y s l o o o o o w download from freenetproject.org/snapshots

2005-10-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the download of large files from their web servers. We need to address this but haven't got around to it yet. Apologies for the inconvenience, Ian. On 22 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Kevin Bennett wrote: > Trying to update to the latest

Re: [freenet-support] V e r y s l o o o o o w download from freenetproject.org/snapshots

2005-10-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Yes, this is because sourceforge now deliberately slow down the download of large files from their web servers. We need to address this but haven't got around to it yet. Apologies for the inconvenience, Ian. On 22 Oct 2005, at 17:23, Kevin Bennett wrote: Trying to update to the latest

[freenet-support] HELP HELP HELP IM BEGGING

2005-10-07 Thread Ian Clarke
You should be able to remove Freenet through the Add/Remove Programs part of the Control Panel, Freenet will be one of the items listed there. A more crude way to remove it would be to delete the C:\Program Files \Freenet folder from your hard disk, although the first option is better.

Re: [freenet-support] HELP HELP HELP IM BEGGING

2005-10-07 Thread Ian Clarke
You should be able to remove Freenet through the Add/Remove Programs part of the Control Panel, Freenet will be one of the items listed there. A more crude way to remove it would be to delete the C:\Program Files \Freenet folder from your hard disk, although the first option is better.

[freenet-support] Re: Revver.com activation email

2005-10-06 Thread Ian Clarke
Hi Steve, Sorry you are having problems, we still have a number of usability issues to work out. One of these is that if you are using Safari, due to a page rendering bug, the link to the upload client is obscured, but you can find it here: http://revver.com/downloadClient/ This issue

[freenet-support] Re: Revver.com activation email

2005-10-06 Thread Ian Clarke
Hi Steve,Sorry you are having problems, we still have a number of usability issues to work out.  One of these is that if you are using Safari, due to a page rendering bug, the link to the upload client is obscured, but you can find it here:  http://revver.com/downloadClient/This issue is in our

[freenet-support] Does Freenet use pre-mix/onion routing yet?

2005-10-03 Thread Ian Clarke
Pre-mix routing will be introduced after 0.7, but will not be supported in 0.7.0 (the first release in the 0.7 series). It will likely be implemented once the initial 0.7 releases are stable. Ian. On 3 Oct 2005, at 14:01, Duana Saskia STANLEY wrote: > > I am 90% sure it doesn't and that

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: >> On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: >>>> Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is >>>> "clusters o

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> >>> Which reduces "globally scalable darknet" to "clusters of dark

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a >>> pure >>

[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: > It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure > darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need to have > something for people to download from freenetproject.org. I see no reason for there to be a separate

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 10:56, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 19 Sep 2005, at 16:54, Matthew Toseland wrote: It is IMHO strategically vital that we can test the network as a pure darknet. We will need an opennet as well, because we need

Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-20 Thread Ian Clarke
On 20 Sep 2005, at 14:08, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 20 Sep 2005, at 11:33, Matthew Toseland wrote: Well, if that would truly be the topology then the alternative is clusters of isolated dark nodes, which is worse? There would

Re: [freenet-support] Opera 8 and Anonyminity warning

2005-06-14 Thread Ian Clarke
Here is the response I sent separately: I didn't discover the Opera problem, but the general issue is that Freenet can't send data to a web browser unless it knows what the web browser will do with it, otherwise the web browser could do something that would compromise your anonymity (such

Re: [freenet-support] docs for x86_64 ?

2005-01-07 Thread Ian Clarke
On 29 Dec 2004, at 22:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the way, I tried going to dodo.freenetproject.org and was greeted by Placeholder for lawtracker.org website What's lawtracker.org ? Its a project I started which, unfortunately, hasn't yet got off the ground. As was pointed out by someone

Re: [Tech] [freenet-support] Is it always this slow?/kicked out of the project

2004-12-01 Thread Ian Clarke
On 1 Dec 2004, at 10:05, Newsbyte wrote: Now, may I ask you if you feel I have helped/supported you with my posts? I ask that, because I just got emailed by Ian saying he kicked me out of the project (well, at least he disabled my freenetproject account) I wasn't aware that you were ever in the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Support Digest, Vol 16, Issue 19

2004-11-26 Thread Ian Clarke
I am glad that you are happy, but what relevance does this have to the Freenet support mailing list? Ian. On 26 Nov 2004, at 13:47, Michael wrote: I jumped the Freenet ship over a month ago and swam to the easy safety of Entropy. Maybe not all the content but hey, it works and works and

Re: [freenet-support] need HELP

2004-11-10 Thread Ian Clarke
On 10 Nov 2004, at 07:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: also i have a website with losta files and stuff and it is in BT but i am worried about getting tracked and caught so i am trying to make this switch... so i need to know how to seed to... if someone has a step by step

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet with fedora core 2 ?

2004-11-08 Thread Ian Clarke
On 8 Nov 2004, at 10:59, Mika Hirvonen wrote: After that, it's relatively smooth sailing. Add the following lines to /etc/yum.conf: [freenet] name=Freenet baseurl=http://nightwatch.mine.nu/freenet/stable/ gpgcheck=0 I had no idea someone had done this - we should link to this from the main

Re: [freenet-support] Announce Digest: Virus?

2004-11-04 Thread Ian Clarke
If you want to ask me a question then send me an email, what relevance does this have to the support mailing list? But for your future reference, forging the from headers in emails is trivially easy and that is what this virus has obviously done, most viruses do. Ian. On 4 Nov 2004, at

Re: [freenet-support] Virus found in Freenet Update

2004-08-31 Thread Ian Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27 Aug 2004, at 23:37, Toad wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:38:01AM +0200, Daniel Dreschers wrote: I tried updateing Freenet to 5092 this morning. After downloading the webinstaller with the update function, my anti-virus program (McAfee

[freenet-support] Moved to chat: Showdown at the Freenode Coral

2004-08-06 Thread Ian Clarke
This discussion is now continuing on the chat mailing list as it is not really appropriate for support. Please post any further follow-ups there. Ian. On 6 Aug 2004, at 15:29, vinyl1 wrote: I suggest we not give Mr. Findley a hard time. He is an honorable guy, and is telling us what the law

Re: [freenet-support] RE: anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-05 Thread Ian Clarke
On 5 Aug 2004, at 04:42, Matthew Findley wrote: Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting illegal material, correct? So you know your computer will be doing something illegal and yet choose to

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4 Aug 2004, at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote As for the uploader Willful blindness can not protect you if it can be shown that you had a reasonable suspicion to believe they you are committing a crime. In fact in some cases a deliberate attempt to not obtain knowledge is proof of that

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:11, Toad wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:22:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for the uploader Willful blindness can not protect you if it can be shown that you had a reasonable suspicion to believe they you are committing a crime. In fact in some cases a

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet. Shaky logic. Nothing is forcing postmen to work for the USPS, yet if it were to be found that a postman had unknowingly transported drugs it is unlikely that they could successfully

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my reading of the Induce Act, Freenet would *probably* be safe as none of its features are expressly intended to allow people

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:00, Ian Clarke wrote: On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet. Shaky logic. Nothing is forcing postmen to work for the USPS, yet if it were to be found that a postman had unknowingly transported drugs

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:38, Toad wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:02:33AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote: On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my reading of the Induce Act, Freenet

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:39, Toad wrote: The problem is that ignorance is indeed a goal in itself on Freenet. It's part of its very basic design features. Same is true of the postal system (otherwise they would mandate that everything is written on postcards). Ian.

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:43, Toad wrote: Which feature of Freenet is *intended* to toward the efforts of copyright holders to enforce copyright law? All of Freenet is intended to thwart those who want to eliminate content on Freenet, and eliminate the contributors and requestors of that content. Not

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Ian Clarke
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:48, Toad wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:44:37AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:39, Toad wrote: The problem is that ignorance is indeed a goal in itself on Freenet. It's part of its very basic design features. Same is true of the postal system (otherwise

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5087

2004-07-28 Thread Ian Clarke
Toad wrote: To obtain best performance from this build, you will need to update your freenet-ext.jar. Shut down the node, download the new freenet-ext.jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-ext.jar , copy it over your existing freenet-ext.jar, and then restart the node. Note that

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] new stable

2004-07-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Newsbyte wrote: Tried it out, and thusfar...it's crap. Can you read? If so, please apply your reading skills to Matthew's announcement of the new build, particularly this part: There may be a readjustment period on the network for a while as people upgrade and the network sorts itself out. Your

[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-27 Thread Ian Clarke
Marc Lehmann wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:38:25AM +0100, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks and array overflows had we implemented in C++). As for focus, our rant You are living in a dream world, really. No, you

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-26 Thread Ian Clarke
Toad wrote: JIT Java (which we're all running) is also very speedy, there's only a few rare instances where it's worth the trouble to replace code with something natively instead. Debatable. But most of the problems with Java come from the fact that it is non-free IMHO. If and when freenet

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-24 Thread Ian Clarke
That is a shame. Clearly I don't agree with your reasoning, there is no evidence that any other language would not have similar or worse issues (consider the amount of time we would spend dealing with memory leaks and array overflows had we implemented in C++). As for focus, our experimental

Re: [freenet-support] Re: freenet on slashdot

2004-05-21 Thread Ian Clarke
Roger Oksanen wrote: Tunneling packets in UDP when both hosts are behind NAT has the following problems: * Generic NAT tunneling implementations don't work; They require that one host is on a routable address. Not true in 85% of cases, most NATs will forward UDP packets that come from a host

Re: Freenet project paypal account frozen was Re: [freenet-support] Payment failure

2004-05-17 Thread Ian Clarke
Yep, I phoned them up and they wouldn't give me any reason beyond use of anonymizing proxy, but did point out that according to their Terms of Service, they don't need one. This is extremely annoying because we lose the numerous monthly subscriptions that people had signed up for, hopefully

Re: [freenet-support] Mac

2004-04-08 Thread Ian Clarke
Getting Freenet working on OSX is pretty straight-forward provided you are comfortable using a command line. Basically you just need to follow the instructions for Linux. We could certainly use someone willing to package Freenet up nicely such that it can be installed and used on OSX without

Re: [freenet-support] Could you cancel my membership ?

2004-04-06 Thread Ian Clarke
I'm afraid I can't, you need to cancel your subscription through PayPal. Kind regards, Ian. On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 16:13, Anjan Bacchu(J) wrote: Subscription Name: Freenet Project Membership Subscription Number: S-6G704031JR625064Y Thank you, I will at a later opportunity try to become

Re: [freenet-support] More Freenet Problems

2004-03-31 Thread Ian Clarke
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 04:03, Steven wrote: After recently being It appears to be running my node properly, but I am still unable to get Fred working. Whenever I go to http://127.0.0.1:/ I get a 500 error. Any idea what the problem might be? Ensure that Freenet is stopped, and delete your

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-11 Thread Ian Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of | DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread, | and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd | want a real FCP

Re: [freenet-support] Compiling freenet with gcj

2004-02-05 Thread Ian Clarke
Does this mean that Freenet now compiles and runs with GCJ? Ian. Niklas Bergh wrote: Committed to unstable CVS. I found the problem. this patch should be applied to stable in order to be able to compile it with gcj. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] I meant it like a one time donation

2004-02-03 Thread Ian Clarke
You need to remove yourself by logging into your paypal account and canceling the subscription. Contact Paypal support if you need help with this. Once you have done this I am happy to refund whatever you did not intend to donate. Ian. Stefano Santoro wrote: Hi, please take me off

Re: [freenet-support] Request for help

2004-01-30 Thread Ian Clarke
Toad wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: Toad wrote: 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with tech mailing list?

2004-01-21 Thread Ian Clarke
Did you send the email from the same email address you used to subscribe? Ian. Victor Denisov wrote: Hello, I've subcribed to the tech mailing list, received a confirmation and then (a couple of hours later) sent an e-mail to it. Contrary to my expectations, I've received a reply telling me

Re: [freenet-support] 5058: Crack open some bubbly!

2004-01-14 Thread Ian Clarke
Brandon Low wrote: I have e-mailed a thread dump to 2 good devs, Awww, why not let the evil devs have a go at it too? ;-) Ian. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet is fading away...

2003-12-11 Thread Ian Clarke
Um, thanks for the pessimism I guess. Some of us are working very hard to figure out how to address the problems we are seeing, but I guess others just want to benefit from this research project without accepting the risks. Fortunately, most seem to accept that sometimes, when you are on the

Re: [freenet-support] Terminate donations, immidiately

2003-11-24 Thread Ian Clarke
I have received no-such request that I can recall. You can cancel payment at any time through the Paypal web interface. I suggest you contact Paypal customer support if you do not know how to do this. Ian. Matt wrote: I am very upset because the donation that I submitted to your

[freenet-support] Progress report, and request for help

2003-11-22 Thread Ian Clarke
Hi All. Time for one of my regular progress reports: Next Generation Routing is in, and we are working feverishly to weed out the bugs, and coax it into working nicely. The process is challenging as often the effects of changes cannot be seen for several days, but we are making progress. We

Re: [freenet-support] High load, Japanese website

2003-11-12 Thread Ian Clarke
S wrote: Question 1: When I point my Macintosh (using Safari) at freenetproject.org, I am redirected to http://de-co.info/freenet/ which is the Japanese Freenet page. My Windows and FreeBSD machines, at the same IP address, wind up at the normal English Freenet page. I have seen this issue

Re: [freenet-support] High load, Japanese website

2003-11-12 Thread Ian Clarke
The Babbler wrote: I would suggest instead changing the test to a check for supporting 'ja' and *not* supporting 'en'. That way if some other browser says that it can support a variety of languages, it would work right by default as well. Eg, Done. Try it now. Ian.

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-10-31 Thread Ian Clarke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed, a redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are more prominently displayed. We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and there are serious problems with it - not least

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-10-31 Thread Ian Clarke
Troed Sångberg wrote: You asked what is needed for general acceptance of Freenet, I replied. And I disagreed. I've advocated Freenet for a long time along my peers (I'm a professional Software Engineer, specialising in crypto/security issues) - and trying to get people to visit links to

[freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5029 - Next Generation Routing now in stable build

2003-10-28 Thread Ian Clarke
this code is still rather new, we do not want the publicity that normally accompanies such a release. Please respect our wishes by not submitting this news to high-traffic websites - we need to save that publicity for the 0.6 release which we are now working toward. Kind regards, Ian Clarke Freenet

Re: [freenet-support] ugly bug

2003-01-22 Thread Ian Clarke
exception actually not appear in freenet.log (as shown by View Logfile) ? d ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us

Re: [freenet-support] Too many builds!

2003-01-03 Thread Ian Clarke
about how up-to-date you want to be. Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us

[freenet-support] Non-support related discussions on this list

2002-11-22 Thread Ian Clarke
/listinfo/chat/ Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us

Re: [freenet-support] Route Not Found Error behind a LAN.

2002-11-09 Thread Ian Clarke
___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal

[freenet-support] We need your help

2002-10-31 Thread Ian Clarke
mail through? You will need to allow relay from hawk.freenetproject.org (4.46.23.40). Contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.5rc2

2002-10-26 Thread Ian Clarke
Final release has been delayed to Wednesday, Unless you hear otherwise from me, final release has not been delayed. Ian. -- Ian Clarkeian[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage

  1   2   >