Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Not detecting JVM Properly
I've just had this problem with Win 7RC. Go to your control panel and uninstall /all/ java VM's then install java SE 'Early Experience' V7 for Windows even if you have windows 64 bit. After a few reinstalls, it works fine. --John Jeff Isaac wrote: > Hello! > > I recently updated to build 1228 per the recommendation of this thread > and the automatic process of my node. I also updated my Java to J6R15, > which according to the Java control panel is the latest version of J6. > My node, however, insists that I have to have J5R15 or J6R20 (which > appears to not exist yet), and is warning me about the security flaw > that I had believed these updates were supposed to protect against. Any > thoughts? Is it possible the node is misidentifying the requirements? > > Thanks! > > ~ Jeff > ___ > Support mailing list > Support@freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet service not starting on Gentoo Linux
Narcis Gratianu wrote: Hello ! I installed and configured freenet, but when I am trying to start it I get this error in the freenet.stderr.log file: /usr/bin/start-freenet.sh: line 7: freenet.node.Main: command not found Can anybody help ? Thank you ! I'm sorry that I cannot offer a script-kiddy answer. However--... The problem is that the "su" command is now stripping the environment. If you search this mailing list you will find a nice answer. My nasty answer is to edit the bit that runs after "su" to put the correct CLASSPATH back in. Regards john ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Null pointer exception
in 5095 This is the stderror.log This is what happens if you misspell the freenet log configuration line. Opening log file failed! INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/libjcpuid-x86-linux.so' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/libjbigi-linux-athlon.so' loaded from resource Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.support.LoggerHookChain.setThreshold(LoggerHookChain.java:96) at freenet.support.LoggerHook.setThreshold(LoggerHook.java:111) at freenet.Core.setupLogger(Core.java:820) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:448) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Can't limit bandwidth usage adequately
Input bandwidth limiting simply doesn't work. Toad is aware of this however other issues have higher priority at this time. Regards John On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, I'm relatively new to freenet. > > I have trouble limiting my incoming bandwidth (with the last 3 builds I've used > since I started using freenet - currently on 5086). > > I'm running on a business internet line that has 1 Mbit/sec local traffic but > only 6.4 kbyte/sec international traffic. Most freenet traffic I gets seems to > be international. As soon as my freenet node starts using an average 7 kbyte/sec > the browsing of the web within the business becomes almost unusable if you are > trying to access an international site. > > So, I want to limit my inbound bandwidth to around 4 kbyte/sec average. > > I tried the following in freenet.ini: > > inputBandwidthLimit=3000 > outputBandwidthLimit=2000 > maxNodeConnections=100 > doOutLimitCutoff=true > outLImitCutoff=0.5 > doReserveOutputBandwidthForSuccess=true > > (plus variations of above and trying other values in configuration file that > comments indicate may affect bandwidth usage) > > All with no good result. Is it actually possible to limit bandwidth? > > With above settings inbound traffic (monitored via firewall software) averages > around 7 kbyte/sec (peaking to 14 kbytes/sec) and outbound traffic averages 7 > kbyte/sec (peaking at around 10 kbyte/sec). > > This totally disrupts internet browsing for other users in business. > > Can anyone recommend settings that can truly limit my bandwidth usage please. > > Thanks, > Bryce. > > > > PS. is there anyway to search this list - maybe the above has been asked before > but I couldn't find where to go to do a search? > > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 5087 works well
Hi toad, This is working really well for me. CPU usage is negligable and I'm able to download stuff I couldn't get before. It did fail after a day or so with OOM (>500M) but thats survivable. Regards John ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] 5086 Funny stats
Thanks for explaining it Trevor. I thought a backoff happened after attempting to contact them. I must be confusing it with a reject. Regards John On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 02:50, Trevor Smith wrote: > John; > > 39 backed off means 39 other nodes *would* have been contacted; but due to > max queries or recent rejects; we did not contact them; but rather skipped > them and continued looking for a node that we are still permitted to route > to. (call this load balancing / overload avoidance or whatever you like) so > 47 nodes were considered; but we only attempted to contact 8 > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 5086 Funny stats
Hi toad, here I've the real thing Attempts were made to contact 8 nodes. * 0 were totally unreachable. * 8 restarted. * 0 cleanly rejected. * 39 backed off. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 5086- Sucess
I'm having great success with this, toad. My home node was previously moribund. Now its as full of life as a spring lamb. A minor quibble is on the stats reported on a failure. I don't have an example on the screen, but it goes like.. Attempts were made to contact 3 nodes 1 cleanly rejected 2 --- 47 backed off So it sure wasn't trying to talk to just 3 nodes! --Regards John (proudly financing freenet each month) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Anyone got Blackdown on
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 07:05, Toad wrote: > I need the output of: > java -version 2>&1 | head -n 1 | sed "s/java version \"\(.*\)\"/\1/" > on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL where the > JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta). I'm running gentoo with blackdown 1.4.2 as my default jvm. Yours script returns 1.4.2-rc1 Regards ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] incoming bandwidth not limited
With 5084 (and previous) I'm seeing unlimited incoming traffic. The conf setting is to limit to 8k but I'm seeing 30k, which is the link limit. I'm doing some downloads and I know incoming bw is hard to control, but even so, i'd expect it to be sort of working. There is no evidence its working at all. Any thoughts? Regards dad ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet can't find Java
This sort of thing happens when you are using 'su' to runfree net as
another user.
like su - freenet -c "./start-freenet.sh"
That is how I start freenet. However su cleans out the environment
variables, before starting. In this case, it is setting PATH back to a
default.
The solution is to set PATH inside the script.
PATH=${PATH}:/path/to/your/java
Regards
Dad
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 05:32, Daniel Lewis wrote:
> I downloaded and installed Java in /usr/java, but when I run freenet it says
> "starting freenet now: Done" then "nice: java: no such file or directory". I'm
> running Fedora Core 1, and am somewhat new to Linux so I'm not sure how to fix
> this problem. Thanks
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5077, Fproxy problems
Toad wrote:
{many nice things}
Thank you toad, a job well done!
Could you please cast your eye to the http interface.
What happens -- Has happend for ages.-- is that after a minimal amount
of activity.
OR a modest amount of up time, http connection via fproxy are unresponsive.
This is very much like the max connection problems of the browsers which
have been documented.
Fixes for Mozilla are also documented, and applied.
However I can browse with galeon, experience artic level slowdowns
whilst talking to the local node (!!)
Then power up mozilla (user.prefs updated) and instantly have the same
problems, talking to the local node.
Netstat will show maybe 30 or 40 connections open to fproxy
It's Dire. Its been around for a year, more I'm sure.
Regards
John
Ps,
the reward for good work is the chance to do more good work.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Blackdown
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:43, Todd wrote: > > Hello, > > Hey. > > > I've tried running freenet stable with blackdown-1.4.1 under linux > > (gentoo) > > Unfortunately it fails after a little while. > > Fails with what? Are you sure it's the JVM and not Freenet? Yes, java seems to be running but fproxy is not contactable. It seems to run for a few hours ok. > > I've switched back to sun 1.4.2_03 > > Does it now not fail? Runs Fine. > I haven't used Freenet (or much of anything, actually) for two months > now. Blackdown/Freenet was working for me as of December 12, 2003. > Funny. Thats computers for you. > -todd > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Blackdown
Hello, I've tried running freenet stable with blackdown-1.4.1 under linux (gentoo) Unfortunately it fails after a little while. I've switched back to sun 1.4.2_03 Regards john ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
Hi I'm running 5065 and getting messageSendTimeRequests over 1000ms, up to 3200ms. My allocated outgoing bandwidth is mostly fully used. This is contributing to my network load, which is now permanently maxed. I've upped requestSendTimeCutoff to 2500, but don't know if its a good idea or not. Does anyone have any recommendations? Regards john -- You too can be a big hero, If you learn to count backwards to zero. In english and german I know how to count down, Und I'm learning chinese, says Werner Von Braun. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Blackdown
Hi Todd, Thats good news! Regards john On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 08:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I run Gentoo/Blackdown, and I have no problems. > > Sorry you didn't get a reply sooner. > > -todd > > > Quoting John Huttley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I am about to switch to gentoo/Blackdown 1.4.1 > > > > Do we have any issues? > > > > Regards > > > > John > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Re: [freenet-support] Expanding a datastore
Thanks, Toad I wasn't sure, from the comments in the conf, file what would happen. Regards john On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 13:13, Toad wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:12:04PM +1300, John Huttley wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any way of expanding a ds?, > > I'd like to go from 5Gb to maybe 10, _Without_ erasing it. > > No problem, just change the storeSize in the config. -- You too can be a big hero, If you learn to count backwards to zero. In english and german I know how to count down, Und I'm learning chinese, says Werner Von Braun. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Expanding a datastore
Hi, Is there any way of expanding a ds?, I'd like to go from 5Gb to maybe 10, _Without_ erasing it. Regards John -- You too can be a big hero, If you learn to count backwards to zero. In english and german I know how to count down, Und I'm learning chinese, says Werner Von Braun. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Blackdown
I am about to switch to gentoo/Blackdown 1.4.1 Do we have any issues? Regards John -- You too can be a big hero, If you learn to count backwards to zero. In english and german I know how to count down, Und I'm learning chinese, says Werner Von Braun. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Re: [freenet-support] An amusing statistic
Got you beat! Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load):3.1624491533886337E-121 On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 07:58, Kevin Bennett wrote: > I looked at the general page of the web interface and was a little amused to > see the following figure: > > Current recommended request interval sent to client nodes > 1.9478309723356009E9ms > > That's roughly 22.5 *days* :D > > Kevin. > > > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Progress report, and request for help
Paid. Regards Dad (It is after all "Freenet Support" right?) Ian Clarke wrote: Hi All. Time for one of my regular progress reports: Next Generation Routing is in, and we are working feverishly to weed out the bugs, and coax it into working nicely. The process is challenging as often the effects of changes cannot be seen for several days, but we are making progress. We have made rapid progress on the issue of load-balancing, and are now focusing on how to ensure that node's specialize appropriately. Just yesterday we implemented a change that might address this problem although it will be a few days before we know how effective it is. One of the negative effects of our decision to migrate over to next-gen routing has been that we haven't put out a new Freenet release in quite a while, and this has left the project's finances in a less than ideal state, since most of our donations come in in the days after a release. The current status is that the project only has enough funding to keep Matthew employed until the middle of next week. As anyone who follows development closely will know, Matthew is central to providing momentum to the development process. As a result, I am appealing to supporters of the project to dig deep and make a contribution to keep things going. You can donate online via Paypal or E-Gold, and if you would prefer to contribute by mail, please email me directly to arrange it. If you would like to make an ongoing contribution to the project, you can even set up a monthly subscription of $5, $10, or $20. Either way, we really need your support to get us to the 0.6 release on which we are now focused. You can donate by visiting our donations page at: http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=donate Many thanks, Ian. Freenet Project Coordinator ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Rounding
I've just got 5039 going and after 15 minutes has not gone berserk. Always a good sign. I laughed when i saw the "Estimated external PSearchFailed number" 1.2653853272907117E-24 Perhaps we could just round this abit? Regards Dad -- You too can be a big hero, If you learn to count backwards to zero. In english and german I know how to count down, Und I'm learning chinese, says Werner Von Braun. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5039
I restart my node daily and the data backlog reaches 100's of Mb within a few hours. I think things are Mighty Bad now and hope this isn't going to make it Mighty Badder. Regards dad On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 06:07, TLD wrote: > > This build turns off rejecting queries based on output bandwidth usage, > > a feature that is unnecessary (we have other ways of limiting bandwidth > > usage) and counterproductive to routing. > > Maybe so, but I doubt having a "Data waiting to be transmitted" value above > 30 minutes worth of transmission (with full bandwidth usage) is good for > the routing, either. > I noticed the value notably lower in the latest builds (in the order of > 5-10 minutes) with the bandwidth usage-based queryreject; I hope things > won't get Mighty Bad again :) > > > Might a "I have the key you need but my band is full and can't send it > right now, try searching with the other nodes meanwhile and come back later > if you really need it" message help such situation? > > -- > /~\ The ASCIITLD > \ / Ribbon Campaign "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain > X Against HTMLa little temporary safety deserve neither liberty > / \ Email! nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin > > > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Node Maxed out, data backlog increasing
Hi, I have a permanent node, version 5036. on Linux. It is set to restart daily at 4am. It is transferring massive amounts of data. I guess I must be a popular man. Current Uptime is 6:39 and it has 512 Connections Open 127 transferring 62Mb Waiting Total transferred 450Mb I'm limiting my out bandwidth to 13Kbps. If I look at it a little later, I'll likely have EVEN MORE data waiting. I'm not using it locally, beyond unsuccessful attempts to get TFE. Node load is 100% almost all the time and so rejecting query requests. Its set for 100 threads and there is lots of RAM I get the feeling that its so busy doing weird stuff for other people that its not processing my requests. Is this sort of thing normal? Any advice gratefully accepted. Regards Dad. === >From the node info page Current routingTime 329ms Curent messageSendTimeRequest 510ms Pooled threads running jobs 42 (35%) Pooled threads which are idle 25 Current upstream bandwidth usage12330 bytes/second (94.8%) Reason for QueryRejecting requests:Estimated load (100%) > overloadHigh (95%)Estimated load (100%) > overloadHigh (95%)It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load 100% [QueryRejecting all incoming requests!] Reason for load:Load due to thread limit = 35% Load due to routingTime = 58.2% = 75% + 25% * (329.927 - 1000.000) / 1000.000 <= overloadLow (75%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 70.9% = 75% + 25% * (510.256 - 1000.000) / 3000.000 <= overloadLow (75%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 112.6% because outputBytes(739820) > limit (624000.009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (13000) * 60 Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load):0.45977154 -- You too can be a big hero, If you learn to count backwards to zero. In english and german I know how to count down, Und I'm learning chinese, says Werner Von Braun. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
