[freenet-support] upgrading node

2008-11-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
robert fallis a ?crit :
> I've been away for a few weeks. and I now get a message to upgrade my node.
> my node is set to automatic update  but it has not worked, How do I  
> upgrade my node?
> help please
> bob

Depends on your operating system :
On Windows, your should have a shortcut to update.cmd.
On Linux, go in freenet's directory and run './update.sh' as a normal
user (not root).

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] upgrading node

2008-11-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
robert fallis a écrit :
 I've been away for a few weeks. and I now get a message to upgrade my node.
 my node is set to automatic update  but it has not worked, How do I  
 upgrade my node?
 help please
 bob

Depends on your operating system :
On Windows, your should have a shortcut to update.cmd.
On Linux, go in freenet's directory and run './update.sh' as a normal
user (not root).



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Do you need to have any firewall ports open when running freenet

2008-10-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
bqz69 a ?crit :
> I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also 
> running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet 
> opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
> 
> I am using "Firestarter" as my "firewall" as I find it easy to use, only.
> 
> Now my question, is it necessary to have any ports open in order for freenet 
> to work best?

Yes, you should open FNP ports used by you node.
You can find them at the bottom of your 'Friends' page.

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] Do you need to have any firewall ports open when running freenet

2008-10-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
bqz69 a écrit :
 I am running freenet (ubuntu 8.04) on one box with no open ports, and also 
 running freenet on another box with most of the ports mentioned in freenet 
 opened - both boxes appears to run fine.
 
 I am using Firestarter as my firewall as I find it easy to use, only.
 
 Now my question, is it necessary to have any ports open in order for freenet 
 to work best?

Yes, you should open FNP ports used by you node.
You can find them at the bottom of your 'Friends' page.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-07 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Monday 04 August 2008 15:46, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> Ian Clarke a ?crit :
>>> Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
>>> anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
>>>
>>> Ian.
>> http://ungoth.com/blog/
>>
>> His website has been viewed 85 times. I don't think we have to be afraid
>> of loosing users because of him ;)
>>
>> Anyway, he says one valuable thing in his "review", the installer should
>> detect buggy JVMs and tell the user. Is it possible ?
> 
> I thought that that was exactly what he was complaining about: he thought he 
> had installed sun java, the installer disagreed, therefore it must be the 
> installer's fault.

Oh ? I didn't know the installer already did this test. Then, I don't
see what we can do more...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFImyLHmY5qNqKdYw0RAlEnAKDWpR8ljAuSOFRjsYg4SNgLoqZc3gCfTcYQ
CcZE6hR7UDPpzBGxV+OqTuY=
=TMUb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-07 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Matthew Toseland a écrit :
 On Monday 04 August 2008 15:46, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
 Ian Clarke a écrit :
 Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
 anyone understand what problem he is running into here?

 Ian.
 http://ungoth.com/blog/

 His website has been viewed 85 times. I don't think we have to be afraid
 of loosing users because of him ;)

 Anyway, he says one valuable thing in his review, the installer should
 detect buggy JVMs and tell the user. Is it possible ?
 
 I thought that that was exactly what he was complaining about: he thought he 
 had installed sun java, the installer disagreed, therefore it must be the 
 installer's fault.

Oh ? I didn't know the installer already did this test. Then, I don't
see what we can do more...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFImyLHmY5qNqKdYw0RAlEnAKDWpR8ljAuSOFRjsYg4SNgLoqZc3gCfTcYQ
CcZE6hR7UDPpzBGxV+OqTuY=
=TMUb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-04 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clarke a ?crit :
> Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
> anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
> 
> Ian.

http://ungoth.com/blog/

His website has been viewed 85 times. I don't think we have to be afraid
of loosing users because of him ;)

Anyway, he says one valuable thing in his "review", the installer should
detect buggy JVMs and tell the user. Is it possible ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlxY0mY5qNqKdYw0RAiFbAJ0RgV/mfbXb6lnWXXk2QeIwAk+4xwCg0xT8
PqD3u12dkF0BGsyNPgkn7Vg=
=fAun
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-08-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a ?crit :
> this is the error message I get while trying to install
> 
> The full error message is :
> #
> An SSL exception has occured:java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error:  
> java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors  
> parameter must be non-empty
> 
> what does it mean?
> and what do I do
> 
> bob

Could you paste here the result of 'java -version' please ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlXOQmY5qNqKdYw0RAggWAKC8a+6IDVSqUlwLfDaGXcUXHd/ytACgo6oh
Oa/Fy6rbFZ4YQJq3hxkcYFY=
=EHDN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-08-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a ?crit :
> On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 18:55 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> robert fallis a ?crit :
>>
>>>>>  Julien.
>>>>> have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
>>>>> partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
>>>>> will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
>>>>> computor. so that I can make a frash start,
>>>>> regards
>>>>> bob
>>>> What operating system are you using ?
>>>  Julien,
>>> linux Kubuntu 8.04 lts
>> OK. You can uninstall Freenet simply by deleting the directory where it
>> is installed. Once it is done, check the version of Java that you are
>> using with a 'java -version'. You need Sun Java 1.5, at least.
>>
> Have tried that but it does not work, mozzila won't open a window it say
> another example is running, and I need to shut it down, the kill command
> wont work on the name firefox, and I've tried ps aux to find the pid,
> but its not labeled as firefox so I can't kill the process

That Firefox problem often happens when there is a .parentlock file in
the profile directory. It should disappear if you remove that file.

Anyway, maybe there is a problem with firefox but how is freenet going ?
If you open a browser to http://127.0.0.1:/ what does it say ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlXNYmY5qNqKdYw0RAkmRAKCQ3XDaUhTPORIl1uJlk67JZyn6+wCfbDnj
XLzAKiIwjFUMXV5Tph0J0lQ=
=5VMS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[freenet-support] Darknet Question .... and some other fundamental Qs

2008-08-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Benjamin Hecht a ?crit :
> When using Darknet, are requests forwarded by friends that are not
> friends of your node?
> 
> For example, if you are friends (via Darknet) with (person A) and
> (person B). And (person B) is friends with (person C) via Darknet,
> will a request from (person A) to (B) be forwarded to (C) if that
> piece is unavailable at (B).

Yes it is. This is the only way to have a global darknet.

> If it is, is it possible to disable this feature -- I guess in other
> words, would changing maximum hops to 1 (if possible) prevent
> searching "Friends of Friends" searching/downloading/pushing, etc.?

Why would you want to do that ? You would only be able to see what your
direct friends have in their store. Are yu trying to create an old
fashion darknet where only a few people have access to it ?


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlXGamY5qNqKdYw0RAgilAJ4xicXtE4y/lhbHZ4Ks0ksjSknePwCeI4W0
lxZSDSN8yzlA/xVxTCS+gHs=
=SNKc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-08-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a écrit :
 On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 18:55 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 robert fallis a écrit :

  Julien.
 have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
 partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
 will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
 computor. so that I can make a frash start,
 regards
 bob
 What operating system are you using ?
  Julien,
 linux Kubuntu 8.04 lts
 OK. You can uninstall Freenet simply by deleting the directory where it
 is installed. Once it is done, check the version of Java that you are
 using with a 'java -version'. You need Sun Java 1.5, at least.

 Have tried that but it does not work, mozzila won't open a window it say
 another example is running, and I need to shut it down, the kill command
 wont work on the name firefox, and I've tried ps aux to find the pid,
 but its not labeled as firefox so I can't kill the process

That Firefox problem often happens when there is a .parentlock file in
the profile directory. It should disappear if you remove that file.

Anyway, maybe there is a problem with firefox but how is freenet going ?
If you open a browser to http://127.0.0.1:/ what does it say ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlXNYmY5qNqKdYw0RAkmRAKCQ3XDaUhTPORIl1uJlk67JZyn6+wCfbDnj
XLzAKiIwjFUMXV5Tph0J0lQ=
=5VMS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-08-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a écrit :
 this is the error message I get while trying to install
 
 The full error message is :
 #
 An SSL exception has occured:java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error:  
 java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors  
 parameter must be non-empty
 
 what does it mean?
 and what do I do
 
 bob

Could you paste here the result of 'java -version' please ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlXOQmY5qNqKdYw0RAggWAKC8a+6IDVSqUlwLfDaGXcUXHd/ytACgo6oh
Oa/Fy6rbFZ4YQJq3hxkcYFY=
=EHDN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Darknet Question .... and some other fundamental Qs

2008-08-03 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Benjamin Hecht a écrit :
 When using Darknet, are requests forwarded by friends that are not
 friends of your node?
 
 For example, if you are friends (via Darknet) with (person A) and
 (person B). And (person B) is friends with (person C) via Darknet,
 will a request from (person A) to (B) be forwarded to (C) if that
 piece is unavailable at (B).

Yes it is. This is the only way to have a global darknet.

 If it is, is it possible to disable this feature -- I guess in other
 words, would changing maximum hops to 1 (if possible) prevent
 searching Friends of Friends searching/downloading/pushing, etc.?

Why would you want to do that ? You would only be able to see what your
direct friends have in their store. Are yu trying to create an old
fashion darknet where only a few people have access to it ?


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIlXGamY5qNqKdYw0RAgilAJ4xicXtE4y/lhbHZ4Ks0ksjSknePwCeI4W0
lxZSDSN8yzlA/xVxTCS+gHs=
=SNKc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-01 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clarke a ?crit :
> Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
> anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
> 
> Ian.

I'd say that he installed sun's JVM but didn't choose to use it with
java-update-alternatives. He never answered my question on that point.

He just kept saying "my JVM is good".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIk1uBmY5qNqKdYw0RAmbNAJ9Ubr0Jq3XW+up5WxRdGicY1UyWwQCfTIw3
VBZWFD93hGuwHGh7iRsA2cA=
=W0PI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 35, Issue 1

2008-08-01 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clarke a écrit :
 Setting aside the fact that this guy is clearly an asshole, does
 anyone understand what problem he is running into here?
 
 Ian.

I'd say that he installed sun's JVM but didn't choose to use it with
java-update-alternatives. He never answered my question on that point.

He just kept saying my JVM is good.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIk1uBmY5qNqKdYw0RAmbNAJ9Ubr0Jq3XW+up5WxRdGicY1UyWwQCfTIw3
VBZWFD93hGuwHGh7iRsA2cA=
=W0PI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-07-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a ?crit :

>>>  Julien.
>>> have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
>>> partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
>>> will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
>>> computor. so that I can make a frash start,
>>> regards
>>> bob
>> What operating system are you using ?
>  Julien,
> linux Kubuntu 8.04 lts

OK. You can uninstall Freenet simply by deleting the directory where it
is installed. Once it is done, check the version of Java that you are
using with a 'java -version'. You need Sun Java 1.5, at least.

When everything is OK, restart a fresh install by clicking on this link
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/mac/freenet.jnlp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIke5rmY5qNqKdYw0RAjarAKDOaP0ja0TtF9XWQ1RHN05Fb2NdkgCfaWBE
7ucV6fIc7+Y+wrHuNyEpGNE=
=roMB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-07-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a ?crit :

>  Julien.
> have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
> partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
> will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
> computor. so that I can make a frash start,
> regards
> bob

What operating system are you using ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIkbdgmY5qNqKdYw0RAvvgAJ9gQ9h9/pkKTlm6lLthj0xa/33qWQCfc6jd
YUfV1ZXKhfnJ3hLCVJ7/GJU=
=9pVS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-07-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a écrit :

  Julien.
 have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
 partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
 will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
 computor. so that I can make a frash start,
 regards
 bob

What operating system are you using ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIkbdgmY5qNqKdYw0RAvvgAJ9gQ9h9/pkKTlm6lLthj0xa/33qWQCfc6jd
YUfV1ZXKhfnJ3hLCVJ7/GJU=
=9pVS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-07-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a écrit :

  Julien.
 have changed permission, but still no joy I have what seams to be a
 partly installed system, I have tried to run the uninstaller but that
 will not work, is there any way to uninstall. the stuff thats on the
 computor. so that I can make a frash start,
 regards
 bob
 What operating system are you using ?
  Julien,
 linux Kubuntu 8.04 lts

OK. You can uninstall Freenet simply by deleting the directory where it
is installed. Once it is done, check the version of Java that you are
using with a 'java -version'. You need Sun Java 1.5, at least.

When everything is OK, restart a fresh install by clicking on this link
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/mac/freenet.jnlp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIke5rmY5qNqKdYw0RAjarAKDOaP0ja0TtF9XWQ1RHN05Fb2NdkgCfaWBE
7ucV6fIc7+Y+wrHuNyEpGNE=
=roMB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-07-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a ?crit :
| Java.IO. IO. exception  cannot run program " home/robert/freenet/bin/
| install_updater.sh Io exception error13, permission denied

It looks like a permission problem. Where are you trying to install the
program ? You should check that your user as write and execute rights on
the folder you specified.


Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiO3LQACgkQmY5qNqKdYw3JGQCdFirGWXutao+zogdouwqlvsRB
W4MAni2MikYybS/kEOojk1sVjI8JYI42
=LJb8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] [Fwd: cannaot install]

2008-07-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

robert fallis a écrit :
| Java.IO. IO. exception  cannot run program  home/robert/freenet/bin/
| install_updater.sh Io exception error13, permission denied

It looks like a permission problem. Where are you trying to install the
program ? You should check that your user as write and execute rights on
the folder you specified.


Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiO3LQACgkQmY5qNqKdYw3JGQCdFirGWXutao+zogdouwqlvsRB
W4MAni2MikYybS/kEOojk1sVjI8JYI42
=LJb8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Unable to install Freenet 0.7 on Ubuntu 8.04 and Java 1.5

2008-07-28 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

You weren't forced to remove gij. You just had to tell your system to
use sun's java by default with the java-update-alternatives command.

Anyway, your problem looks solved, have fun !


Avi Kak a ?crit :
| Thanks Julien!
|
| My system already had the Sun packages.
| However, I needed to delete the packages
|
| gij
| gij-4.2
|
| After that I was able to install Freenet.
|
| Avi
|
|
| On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 08:59 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
| Avi Kak a ?crit :
|
| | gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
|
| You have to use Sun's JVM :
|
| $ sudo aptitude install sun-java6-jre
| $ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun
|
| Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiNhrMACgkQmY5qNqKdYw2MVgCfRCmhs0FUb9lfhPgrP+7D0SCQ
+1sAnAgMt1SXfCpqjk3b10hku9/rPQc6
=H7vL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] Unable to install Freenet 0.7 on Ubuntu 8.04 and Java 1.5

2008-07-28 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

You weren't forced to remove gij. You just had to tell your system to
use sun's java by default with the java-update-alternatives command.

Anyway, your problem looks solved, have fun !


Avi Kak a écrit :
| Thanks Julien!
|
| My system already had the Sun packages.
| However, I needed to delete the packages
|
| gij
| gij-4.2
|
| After that I was able to install Freenet.
|
| Avi
|
|
| On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 08:59 +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
| Avi Kak a écrit :
|
| | gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)
|
| You have to use Sun's JVM :
|
| $ sudo aptitude install sun-java6-jre
| $ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun
|
| Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiNhrMACgkQmY5qNqKdYw2MVgCfRCmhs0FUb9lfhPgrP+7D0SCQ
+1sAnAgMt1SXfCpqjk3b10hku9/rPQc6
=H7vL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] please help me.

2008-07-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

abdussalam Mansoor a ?crit :
| Hello:
|
| I successfully installed Freenet 0.7 , but after opning the browser
| alwys receved  "
| Status alerts summary

This is the list of all you node's problems. You can solve them,
one-by-one :

| Click on an item for more information or to get rid of it.
|
| * No peers found 

Your node isn't connected to any other node. You should exchange your
references with some friends of you (people you actuall know and trust,
and are running a freenet node).

If you don't know/trust anyone using Freenet, you should consider
activating "Insecure mode", majing your node connect to strangers.
Note that if you do that, your ISP/government can easily know that you
are using Freenet.

| * Your node name isn't defined.


Just give your node a name. It will only be visible by you and your Friends.

| * Connection problems: Please forward UDP port 27572 (you may have
|   already done this).
|   "

This is not mandatory but will help connections to the network. If you
can't open that port in your firewall, just ignore it.

| other thing i couldnot open my google email account.

I can't see a reason for that one...


Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiMJccACgkQmY5qNqKdYw1eawCgut5phLpXsEXXnqW9PTxeLD48
BC0AnRFF6DOYsvZt1Nu4wVTWyQA4wBhF
=pn+R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[freenet-support] Unable to install Freenet 0.7 on Ubuntu 8.04 and Java 1.5

2008-07-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Avi Kak a ?crit :

| gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)

You have to use Sun's JVM :

$ sudo aptitude install sun-java6-jre
$ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun

Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiMHNgACgkQmY5qNqKdYw2R1QCfUhRae6TUTj1Ovk58G23uRbWt
/QgAoMkVjidFiwlrTeJ3ZeQhImHSK9oL
=g354
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] Unable to install Freenet 0.7 on Ubuntu 8.04 and Java 1.5

2008-07-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Avi Kak a écrit :

| gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu6)

You have to use Sun's JVM :

$ sudo aptitude install sun-java6-jre
$ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun

Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiMHNgACgkQmY5qNqKdYw2R1QCfUhRae6TUTj1Ovk58G23uRbWt
/QgAoMkVjidFiwlrTeJ3ZeQhImHSK9oL
=g354
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] please help me.

2008-07-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

abdussalam Mansoor a écrit :
| Hello:
|
| I successfully installed Freenet 0.7 , but after opning the browser
| alwys receved  
| Status alerts summary

This is the list of all you node's problems. You can solve them,
one-by-one :

| Click on an item for more information or to get rid of it.
|
| * No peers found http://127.0.0.1:/alerts/#6783657

Your node isn't connected to any other node. You should exchange your
references with some friends of you (people you actuall know and trust,
and are running a freenet node).

If you don't know/trust anyone using Freenet, you should consider
activating Insecure mode, majing your node connect to strangers.
Note that if you do that, your ISP/government can easily know that you
are using Freenet.

| * Your node name isn't defined.
http://127.0.0.1:/alerts/#14111765

Just give your node a name. It will only be visible by you and your Friends.

| * Connection problems: Please forward UDP port 27572 (you may have
|   already done this).
|   http://127.0.0.1:/alerts/#port-forward:9977237

This is not mandatory but will help connections to the network. If you
can't open that port in your firewall, just ignore it.

| other thing i couldnot open my google email account.

I can't see a reason for that one...


Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiMJccACgkQmY5qNqKdYw1eawCgut5phLpXsEXXnqW9PTxeLD48
BC0AnRFF6DOYsvZt1Nu4wVTWyQA4wBhF
=pn+R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 - not able to connect to the first time Wizard

2008-06-28 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Salvatore Del Popolo a ?crit :
> Hello,
> I installed Freenet 0.7 on a Linux machine, Ubuntu distribution 7.10. I 
> downloaded and unpacked the .tar.gz file and I ran the command:
> ./run.sh start
> 
> It seems all ok, but when pointed my browser, lynx, to 
> 127.0.0.1:/wizard/, I received the message saying that the page is 
> not available.
> I attach you the wrapper.log file. It contains error messages I am not 
> able to understand.
> Thank you for your help and your work.

It looks like you are using GCJ. You should install Sun's JRE 1.5 at least.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIZf1CmY5qNqKdYw0RAq06AJ4/l+VQBGHEAsgh/Co1bvuRjMcuZgCePTrD
wOon2ULFTHxode0bDaJ8jJ4=
=r313
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 - not able to connect to the first time Wizard

2008-06-28 Thread Julien Cornuwel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Salvatore Del Popolo a écrit :
 Hello,
 I installed Freenet 0.7 on a Linux machine, Ubuntu distribution 7.10. I 
 downloaded and unpacked the .tar.gz file and I ran the command:
 ./run.sh start
 
 It seems all ok, but when pointed my browser, lynx, to 
 127.0.0.1:/wizard/, I received the message saying that the page is 
 not available.
 I attach you the wrapper.log file. It contains error messages I am not 
 able to understand.
 Thank you for your help and your work.

It looks like you are using GCJ. You should install Sun's JRE 1.5 at least.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIZf1CmY5qNqKdYw0RAq06AJ4/l+VQBGHEAsgh/Co1bvuRjMcuZgCePTrD
wOon2ULFTHxode0bDaJ8jJ4=
=r313
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Running both versions at the same time?

2008-05-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Level 13 a ?crit :
> Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the
> same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between
> the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?

It's perfectly feasible, if you have sufficient ressources...

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



[freenet-support] Usability testing on Windows XP

2008-05-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,


Just had the occasion to follow a beginner through the installation
process via Java Webstart, on Windows XP. Here is what I noticed :

- The installer is now signed with a Thawte certificate, which is
accepted by default. That's good !
- The two phase install confused the user. He thought the install was
finished after the first one and didn't understood the programm was
actually downloading freenet in the second one.
- He was again confused when the browser spawned up saying "Installation
successfull" and the installer was still donwloading stuff.
Additionnaly, that page was in English despite the fact he chose French
in the installer. I had to tell him he had to finish the installer and
then, click on the link to the first-time wizard.
- The wizard was quite straightforward and he choose default values,
which happened to be good for him, IMHO.
- Just a detail : every shortcuts (except Browse Freenet) in the menu
came with the same default icon. He was disapointed and I had to tell
him it was irrelevant and everything was fine.

Maybe we should only spawn the browser at the very end of the
installation process, when the installer closes and Freenet is up and
running. And maybe we should open directly to the wizard page, which is
i18n-ed.


Hope this is usefull...

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



[freenet-support] Usability testing on Windows XP

2008-05-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,


Just had the occasion to follow a beginner through the installation
process via Java Webstart, on Windows XP. Here is what I noticed :

- The installer is now signed with a Thawte certificate, which is
accepted by default. That's good !
- The two phase install confused the user. He thought the install was
finished after the first one and didn't understood the programm was
actually downloading freenet in the second one.
- He was again confused when the browser spawned up saying Installation
successfull and the installer was still donwloading stuff.
Additionnaly, that page was in English despite the fact he chose French
in the installer. I had to tell him he had to finish the installer and
then, click on the link to the first-time wizard.
- The wizard was quite straightforward and he choose default values,
which happened to be good for him, IMHO.
- Just a detail : every shortcuts (except Browse Freenet) in the menu
came with the same default icon. He was disapointed and I had to tell
him it was irrelevant and everything was fine.

Maybe we should only spawn the browser at the very end of the
installation process, when the installer closes and Freenet is up and
running. And maybe we should open directly to the wizard page, which is
i18n-ed.


Hope this is usefull...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Running both versions at the same time?

2008-05-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Level 13 a écrit :
 Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the
 same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between
 the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?

It's perfectly feasible, if you have sufficient ressources...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] A maximum of 40 connections on XP SP3?

2008-05-23 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Level 13 a ?crit :
> My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open
> connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed
> connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel,
> e.g.
> 
> Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90)

I read that a few month ago, people were only able to connect to 120-150
nodes on the 0.5 network.

Is it possible that this is the actual size of the 0.5 network ?

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] A maximum of 40 connections on XP SP3?

2008-05-23 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Level 13 a écrit :
 My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open
 connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed
 connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel,
 e.g.
 
 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90)

I read that a few month ago, people were only able to connect to 120-150
nodes on the 0.5 network.

Is it possible that this is the actual size of the 0.5 network ?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Fproxy SSL certificate invalid for FF3

2008-05-02 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,

Just upgraded to the latest Ubuntu, which uses Firefix 3. I've got the
usual warnings about the certificate being self-signed, blah blah blah...

But, after I created a "Security exception" to accept this certificate,
I've got another error (sec_error_bad_signature) and the browser stops here.

Anything I can do except generating my own valid certificate ?

Regards,

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

2008-04-30 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :

>>> 1 megabit upload?
>> Yep. 14 down, 1 up.
> 
> What's the fastest download speed you've seen? That's a seriously asymmetric 
> connection...

It's quite common in France. At least in big cities.

On Freenet, I never saw more than 65-70 KB/s.
On the web, the best I saw was downloading and ISO from my ISP mirror,
it was 1.5MB/s.


-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

2008-04-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008 11:56, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s
>> upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer
>> so resources consumption is not an issue. For normal operations, I've
>> got no problems. But when it comes to online gaming, weird things happen :
> 
> 1 megabit upload?

Yep. 14 down, 1 up.

>> Other players see my ping as normal (a bit high but nothing I should
>> worry about) but I've got lags and sometimes, I completely loose the
>> connection. The game freezes, other players yell at me, I stop Freenet
>> and everything's back to normal.
> 
> :|
> 
> This would be easier if we had a rabbit icon.

Not for me (the node is on another box), but maybe for others.

>> For now, the only solution is to stop the node each time I want to play.
>> Not a good thing for the network. I can try to reduce Freenet's bandwith
>> even more, but I don't think it will help much.
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
> 
> The current bandwidth limiting code is not completely accurate. It only 
> throttles data packets: not resends, not normal messages.

And you think it could create such long spikes ? Last time I forgot to
stop it, my account had been silent for almost a minute until I stop the
node...

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20080429/f5e6348b/attachment.pgp>


[freenet-support] Freenet's impact on online gaming

2008-04-29 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,

I'm sure a lot of users are interested about that. I've got 128KB/s
upload and Freenet limited to 40. Freenet runs on a dedicated computer
so resources consumption is not an issue. For normal operations, I've
got no problems. But when it comes to online gaming, weird things happen :

Other players see my ping as normal (a bit high but nothing I should
worry about) but I've got lags and sometimes, I completely loose the
connection. The game freezes, other players yell at me, I stop Freenet
and everything's back to normal.

For now, the only solution is to stop the node each time I want to play.
Not a good thing for the network. I can try to reduce Freenet's bandwith
even more, but I don't think it will help much.

Any thoughts ?

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



[freenet-support] The site ignores an important FAQ

2008-04-28 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Simply Paranoid a ?crit :
> Hello fellow paranoids!

Hi,

> I've spent ~a good hour on the site trying to find answers for 2 simple
> yet important questions regarding insecure mode:
> 1. Can my ISP know what am I downloading/uploading to FreeNet?

No, he can't. This is clearly mentionned in the French documentation.
Maybe the official site should clear that point too.

> 2. Can the nodes I download/upload from (Read: NSA in disguise) see what
> I'm doing?
> Of course, we assume they don't use correlation attacks or any other
> ridiculous & unlikely methods.

IF we assume they don't use sophisticated attacks, they can't either.

But I'm not sure it's a good idea to assume they don't try... The
Darknet connection mode is here to avoid that particular risk.

> I believe the answer to the second question is "yes until 0.8", though
> I'm not sure. The first question, however, is essentially unmentioned at
> all, at least directly*. If both the ISP and connecting nodes can read
> the content, then I find very little difference between FN and say,
> Limewire!

And that wouldn't have been worth the years of work ;)

> Anyway it would be nice to see this info on the site in order to compare
> between FreeNet and similar projects like I2P.

I second that.


Regards,

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: 



[freenet-support] Node still restarting after 1073 update

2007-11-20 Thread Julien Cornuwel aka batosai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

My node auto-updated to 1073 yesterday evening and it is not yet up :

Your freenet node is starting up, please hold on.
Current status
INFO | jvm 4 | 2007/11/20 11:08:53 | Moving blocks: 0% ( 12287/1573376)
...

I think it is because I decided to reduce my datastore size from 200GB
to 100GB a few days ago. Is there a way to speed up things ? Or maybe
I can stop it and put it back to the previous value ?

Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHQsJXo6N05NzaOvURArpMAKC6SdEyqnnUbkw//Cl2QZ4yvv67EwCgjVOe
G592vTQ+gT//CNC9zDLhRCQ=
=efy7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[freenet-support] Node still restarting after 1073 update

2007-11-20 Thread Julien Cornuwel aka batosai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

My node auto-updated to 1073 yesterday evening and it is not yet up :

Your freenet node is starting up, please hold on.
Current status
INFO | jvm 4 | 2007/11/20 11:08:53 | Moving blocks: 0% ( 12287/1573376)
...

I think it is because I decided to reduce my datastore size from 200GB
to 100GB a few days ago. Is there a way to speed up things ? Or maybe
I can stop it and put it back to the previous value ?

Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHQsJXo6N05NzaOvURArpMAKC6SdEyqnnUbkw//Cl2QZ4yvv67EwCgjVOe
G592vTQ+gT//CNC9zDLhRCQ=
=efy7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] hang on install

2007-10-10 Thread Julien Cornuwel aka batosai
Michael R. Hines a ?crit :
> Oh great.
>
> (I didn't change any default options. I just used the new_installer.jar)
>
> Can I get it from the website, or do I need check checkout a subversion copy?
>   

You can download the latest trunk version here :
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ (pick the one with the
biggest number : freenet-rX-snapshot.jar)
and overwrite your freenet.jar with it.

Or you can just wait for next release and update manually




[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread Julien Cornuwel
an ominous cow herd a ?crit :

>I can empathize.  Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take 
>a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an 
>alpha version.  The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as 
>the stable version instead of the "unsupported" version, and 0.7 as the alpha 
>version still under development.  New users would opt for the stable version.  
>Having new users directed to an alpha version while the stable version is 
>fully functioning is quite strange.
>  
>

My point of view is that Freenet has always been a work-in-progress. The 
0.5 version you call "stable" was under developpement just before 
becoming unsupported. It has never been stable : google a bit and you'll 
find scripts for restarting it every night because of its "unstability".

Did you try both versions ? If yes, you should have noticed that they 
are quite as stable and that 0.7 offers far better performances and 
AFAIK the same security level.

So, why should the developpers of the project push newcomers to an 
old/buggy/unsupported/user-hostile network while they are working on 
another one that is *already* better ?

My 2 cents
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3505 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread Julien Cornuwel

an ominous cow herd a écrit :

I can empathize.  Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take 
a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an 
alpha version.  The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as 
the stable version instead of the unsupported version, and 0.7 as the alpha 
version still under development.  New users would opt for the stable version.  
Having new users directed to an alpha version while the stable version is 
fully functioning is quite strange.
 



My point of view is that Freenet has always been a work-in-progress. The 
0.5 version you call stable was under developpement just before 
becoming unsupported. It has never been stable : google a bit and you'll 
find scripts for restarting it every night because of its unstability.


Did you try both versions ? If yes, you should have noticed that they 
are quite as stable and that 0.7 offers far better performances and 
AFAIK the same security level.


So, why should the developpers of the project push newcomers to an 
old/buggy/unsupported/user-hostile network while they are working on 
another one that is *already* better ?


My 2 cents


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread Julien Cornuwel

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :


.7 has very few users, very little content, and no opennet.
It's useless for new users.



I'm not sure stopping linking it on the website would help it have more 
users. About content, I see new freesites apearing quite the same rythm 
as on 0.5 so it's just a matter of time for 0.7 to have as much content 
as 0.5.



And the security that you say is better has yet to be tested. I



Where did I say that ? In the same security level. ?
AFAIK, the same is not equal to better. Maybe I'm wrong.


wouldn't bet on something that's only been around for a few months vs.
something that's been slowly improving for...well, longer than I've
known freenet.



Anyway, I won't argue on that because the decision is not in my hands.
The fact is that 0.7 is the only supported version and that it is the 
future. Not linking to the current version and gripping to the old one 
would be an interesting kind of suicide for a project that's a constant 
work-in-progress...


Regards


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,

I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to 
update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !

Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive 
them safely ?

Regards



[freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Julien Cornuwel

Hi,

I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to 
update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty !


Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive 
them safely ?


Regards
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Huge logfile (3GB in 1 hour)

2005-11-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Bob a ?crit :

>Julien Cornuwel  writes:
>
>  
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem. 
>>Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know 
>>what it means and how to solve the problem ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>QUOTE***
>  
>
>>25 nov. 2005 22:17:28 (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network 
>>reading thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: 
>>java.lang.NullPointerException
>>java.lang.NullPointerException
>>
>>at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.implDereg(Unknown Source)
>>
>>
>--snip--
>
>This is probably due to a bug in Java. There are problems with the NIO selector
>loop easily getting overwhelmed in 1.4.x. There's a workaround in Azureus for
>this, I think I posted about it a while ago but I don't remember if changes 
>were
>made.
>Possibly it was this commit in 2.3.0.2 :
>"Core | Fix compatibility with JRE 1.4 series under Win32 due to NIO bug"
>(http://azureus.sourceforge.net/changelog_v2.php)
>
>Anyway, try telling them to upgrade to 1.5 (aka Java 5) from www.java.com and
>that should hopefully fix it.
>  
>

OK, I'll transmit. Thanks !




Re: [freenet-support] Re: Huge logfile (3GB in 1 hour)

2005-11-27 Thread Julien Cornuwel

Bob a écrit :


Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 


Hi all,

Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem. 
Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know 
what it means and how to solve the problem ?



   


QUOTE***
 

25 nov. 2005 22:17:28 (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network 
reading thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: 
java.lang.NullPointerException

java.lang.NullPointerException

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.implDereg(Unknown Source)
   


--snip--

This is probably due to a bug in Java. There are problems with the NIO selector
loop easily getting overwhelmed in 1.4.x. There's a workaround in Azureus for
this, I think I posted about it a while ago but I don't remember if changes were
made.
Possibly it was this commit in 2.3.0.2 :
Core | Fix compatibility with JRE 1.4 series under Win32 due to NIO bug
(http://azureus.sourceforge.net/changelog_v2.php)

Anyway, try telling them to upgrade to 1.5 (aka Java 5) from www.java.com and
that should hopefully fix it.
 



OK, I'll transmit. Thanks !

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Huge logfile (3GB in 1 hour)

2005-11-26 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi all,

Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem. 
Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know 
what it means and how to solve the problem ?

QUOTE**
25 nov. 2005 22:17:28 (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network 
reading thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.implDereg(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.processDeregisterQueue(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.doSelect(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.selectNow(Unknown Source)

at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.mySelect(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:584)

at 
freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.beforeSelect(ReadSelectorLoop.java:144)

at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:763)

at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.run(ReadSelectorLoop.java:545)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

25 nov. 2005 22:17:28 (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network 
reading thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.implDereg(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.processDeregisterQueue(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.doSelect(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.selectNow(Unknown Source)

at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.mySelect(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:584)

at 
freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.beforeSelect(ReadSelectorLoop.java:144)

at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:763)

at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.run(ReadSelectorLoop.java:545)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)




[freenet-support] Huge logfile (3GB in 1 hour)

2005-11-26 Thread Julien Cornuwel

Hi all,

Someone asked me to help him but I don't know what causes that problem. 
Is logfile is filled with that message (several per second). Do you know 
what it means and how to solve the problem ?


QUOTE**
25 nov. 2005 22:17:28 (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network 
reading thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: 
java.lang.NullPointerException

java.lang.NullPointerException

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.implDereg(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.processDeregisterQueue(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.doSelect(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.selectNow(Unknown Source)

at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.mySelect(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:584)


at 
freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.beforeSelect(ReadSelectorLoop.java:144)


at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:763)


at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.run(ReadSelectorLoop.java:545)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

25 nov. 2005 22:17:28 (freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop, Network 
reading thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: 
java.lang.NullPointerException

java.lang.NullPointerException

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.implDereg(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.processDeregisterQueue(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.WindowsSelectorImpl.doSelect(Unknown Source)

at sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.selectNow(Unknown Source)

at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.mySelect(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:584)


at 
freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.beforeSelect(ReadSelectorLoop.java:144)


at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:763)


at freenet.transport.ReadSelectorLoop.run(ReadSelectorLoop.java:545)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-19 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :

>My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
>some time ago.
>  
>

That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.

>Make your own darknet. :)
>Then come to Bristol, take me out for a pizza, and I'll connect to your
>node ;). Seriously, there needs to be some sort of relationship for the
>small world properties to hold, but beyond that it's not such a big
>deal.
>  
>

Some of us think about it but I see 2 problems to that :
- We don't know each others and can't trust one not to be part of DST
(our MI-5) or SNEP (our RIAA). So we can't reasonably reveal our real
identities.
- If we do that, newcommers will be completely alone and we won't be
able to guide them or invite them into the darknet.

OK for the pizza as long as it has cheese on it ;-)

>>I'm affraid that if this fonctionnality isn't enabled in Freenet, people
>>will do it by other ways (internet forums, mailing-lists, weak encrypted
>>emails, etc.) which are way less secure than Freenet. Or worse, some
>>will decide to publish their keys and allow anyone to connect to the
>>darknet through them...
>>
>>
>
>In which case there will be weak segments of the darknet. That does not
>undermine the whole structure. The mainstreamers can still use the
>opennet. I expect there to be some cross-recruiting. But the intention
>is for the darknet to be separate from the opennet. People who happen to
>be on both can migrate content manually. They can also get to know
>people on the opennet, and perhaps add them later. I first met Ian after
>having worked for him for around a year; I have a friend in Australia who
>I've never met but I would be perfectly happy to connect my node to. But
>at this stage, I would happily connect to Newsbyte. Or CofE if I knew
>him, but I obviously wouldn't want him to breach his carefully guarded
>anonymity just for that. :)
>

Mmm, well. Let's wait and see how that will work. Middle 2006, it'll be
clearer...

Thanks for your answers.

-- 
http://www.freenet-fr.org




Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-19 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a écrit :

My understanding is that the french crypto regulations were abandoned
some time ago.
  


That law is just a project (no decree yet). For the moment, we're still
limited to 128b.

Make your own darknet. :)
Then come to Bristol, take me out for a pizza, and I'll connect to your
node ;). Seriously, there needs to be some sort of relationship for the
small world properties to hold, but beyond that it's not such a big
deal.
  


Some of us think about it but I see 2 problems to that :
- We don't know each others and can't trust one not to be part of DST
(our MI-5) or SNEP (our RIAA). So we can't reasonably reveal our real
identities.
- If we do that, newcommers will be completely alone and we won't be
able to guide them or invite them into the darknet.

OK for the pizza as long as it has cheese on it ;-)

I'm affraid that if this fonctionnality isn't enabled in Freenet, people
will do it by other ways (internet forums, mailing-lists, weak encrypted
emails, etc.) which are way less secure than Freenet. Or worse, some
will decide to publish their keys and allow anyone to connect to the
darknet through them...



In which case there will be weak segments of the darknet. That does not
undermine the whole structure. The mainstreamers can still use the
opennet. I expect there to be some cross-recruiting. But the intention
is for the darknet to be separate from the opennet. People who happen to
be on both can migrate content manually. They can also get to know
people on the opennet, and perhaps add them later. I first met Ian after
having worked for him for around a year; I have a friend in Australia who
I've never met but I would be perfectly happy to connect my node to. But
at this stage, I would happily connect to Newsbyte. Or CofE if I knew
him, but I obviously wouldn't want him to breach his carefully guarded
anonymity just for that. :)


Mmm, well. Let's wait and see how that will work. Middle 2006, it'll be
clearer...

Thanks for your answers.

-- 
http://www.freenet-fr.org

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Following the post named "Hypothetical question", I'd like to expose you
a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong.

We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't
enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on
the opennet which is less secure.

If, by a kind of miracle, I meet someone IRL that I trust and is
interrested in Freenet. We make a darknet together and... we're
completely alone ! We won't even see the opennet, so we'll have no
chance to make new connections except IRL.

If the French Community decides to make a Darknet, we'll maybe be able
to make connections to non-french users we know (but only in Freenet,
which is a very BAD trust relationship) and to join the big darknet. But
newcommers, how will they find us ? We won't be able to see their posts
or sites.

Suppose Freenet 0.7 becomes illegal in France (what it already is,
because of the AES 256 encryption). The opennet won't be secure for us,
but we won't be able to join the darknet. What could we do ? Keep on
using 0.5 ?

As I understand the theory, Freenet 0.7 will be great for pre-existing
resistant-like networks, which already know each others and don't need
to speak to other people. It will also be great for Freenet devs, who
already know the large community of alpha-testers.
But it is fully useless if you want to create from zero such a network
with other good-will people, what is exactly what we'll have to do in
the west during the next years.


I hope that I misunderstood something and that 0.7 will be usable by
other people than the devs and very organised networks. Please, reassure
me. Or explain me that I should stop waiting for 0.7 and accept the idea
that the only working Freenet will no more evolve.



[freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you
a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong.

We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't
enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on
the opennet which is less secure.

If, by a kind of miracle, I meet someone IRL that I trust and is
interrested in Freenet. We make a darknet together and... we're
completely alone ! We won't even see the opennet, so we'll have no
chance to make new connections except IRL.

If the French Community decides to make a Darknet, we'll maybe be able
to make connections to non-french users we know (but only in Freenet,
which is a very BAD trust relationship) and to join the big darknet. But
newcommers, how will they find us ? We won't be able to see their posts
or sites.

Suppose Freenet 0.7 becomes illegal in France (what it already is,
because of the AES 256 encryption). The opennet won't be secure for us,
but we won't be able to join the darknet. What could we do ? Keep on
using 0.5 ?

As I understand the theory, Freenet 0.7 will be great for pre-existing
resistant-like networks, which already know each others and don't need
to speak to other people. It will also be great for Freenet devs, who
already know the large community of alpha-testers.
But it is fully useless if you want to create from zero such a network
with other good-will people, what is exactly what we'll have to do in
the west during the next years.


I hope that I misunderstood something and that 0.7 will be usable by
other people than the devs and very organised networks. Please, reassure
me. Or explain me that I should stop waiting for 0.7 and accept the idea
that the only working Freenet will no more evolve.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Integration in 0.7

2005-09-17 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a écrit :

On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
  

Following the post named Hypothetical question, I'd like to expose you
a practical case : the French community. Stop me when I'm wrong.

We all know each others only by Freenet and it is said that it isn't
enough to form a darknet together, correct ? So we'll have to stay on
the opennet which is less secure.

If, by a kind of miracle, I meet someone IRL that I trust and is
interrested in Freenet. We make a darknet together and... we're
completely alone ! We won't even see the opennet, so we'll have no
chance to make new connections except IRL.

If the French Community decides to make a Darknet, we'll maybe be able
to make connections to non-french users we know (but only in Freenet,
which is a very BAD trust relationship) and to join the big darknet. But
newcommers, how will they find us ? We won't be able to see their posts
or sites.



As far as the above goes, please read the responses to the other post.
  



I did. So you confirm my understanding ? 99% of current Freenet users
won't be able to join the darknet and will have to use opennet.


Suppose Freenet 0.7 becomes illegal in France (what it already is,
because of the AES 256 encryption). The opennet won't be secure for us,
but we won't be able to join the darknet. What could we do ? Keep on
using 0.5 ?



The opennet will probably be more secure than 0.5. But both are very
easy to shut down, because they can be very easily harvested - all nodes
can be found easily, meaning they can be blocked, attacked, etc.
  


That is why I'm searching a way for someone who is neither a member of
alpha-testers/Freenet-devs, nor a very organised terrorist/paedophile to
join the darknet.

Do you think it would be possible for nodes in the darknet to see what
happens in the opennet ?
Maybe a special kind of nodes that acts as a gateway between the 2
networks : it wouldn't endanger the anonymity of thoses who are in the
darknet but it would give them the ability to see the newcommers and
eventually decide to invite them.

My opinion is that a resistance-network has to be closed tight when war
is on. But it needs to create itself before that. So if some people
could choose the become some fuses between open and dark, the darknet
would remain safe and be able to recruit.

I'm affraid that if this fonctionnality isn't enabled in Freenet, people
will do it by other ways (internet forums, mailing-lists, weak encrypted
emails, etc.) which are way less secure than Freenet. Or worse, some
will decide to publish their keys and allow anyone to connect to the
darknet through them...

-- 
http://www.freenet-fr.org

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Adding a new index to the gateway interface ?

2005-08-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,

The devs could consider adding the DBR site called "L'annuaire" to the
default bookmarks. It's a french-CPfree-index that seems to be reliable.
I think it could help french newbies to discover Freenet and make some
of them stay with us.

SSK at 5EeRgwKAe9mqZFwqYKNu6uE4l2APAgM/annuaire//

-- 
http://www.freenet-fr.org



[freenet-support] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2005-08-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a ?crit :

>Does this happen after you start Freenet up, or had the node already
>been running for a while? It's quite possible we have a slow FD leak
>somewhere...
>
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>
>>
>>I'm currently clearing the datastore :-/ Maybe it will help.
>>
>>

The machine began to get very slow (huge memory usage, etc.) and the
error message appear after the first restart.

The problem is now solved (by flushing the datastore), thank you for
your answer.



[freenet-support] Adding a new index to the gateway interface ?

2005-08-31 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi,

The devs could consider adding the DBR site called L'annuaire to the
default bookmarks. It's a french-CPfree-index that seems to be reliable.
I think it could help french newbies to discover Freenet and make some
of them stay with us.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]/annuaire//

-- 
http://www.freenet-fr.org
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2005-08-30 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi all,

After a few month of perfect working, my Freenet box (Sun Java 1.4.2 and
then 1.5 on Debian) began to be very slow.
To the point that it took up to 5 minutes just to show the "Web
Interface"...

The complete error message is :

Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files,
LSL.processConnections failing

***

java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.processConnections(ListenSelectorLoop.java:108)
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:864)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(UCaught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files, 
LSL.processConnections failing
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.processConnections(ListenSelectorLoop.java:108)
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:864)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
java.lang.Exception
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:865)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
nknown Source)
java.lang.Exception
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:865)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)



After a little googling, I found out this :
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/7769

But on Debian, ulimit says "Unlimitted" so it can't be that.

I'm currently clearing the datastore :-/ Maybe it will help.


Has someone an idea ?



[freenet-support] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2005-08-30 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Hi all,

After a few month of perfect working, my Freenet box (Sun Java 1.4.2 and
then 1.5 on Debian) began to be very slow.
To the point that it took up to 5 minutes just to show the Web
Interface...

The complete error message is :

Caught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files,
LSL.processConnections failing

***

java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.processConnections(ListenSelectorLoop.java:108)
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:864)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(UCaught a java.io.IOException: Too many open files, 
LSL.processConnections failing
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(Unknown Source)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.processConnections(ListenSelectorLoop.java:108)
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:864)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
java.lang.Exception
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:865)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
nknown Source)
java.lang.Exception
at 
freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:865)
at 
freenet.transport.ListenSelectorLoop.run(ListenSelectorLoop.java:150)at 
java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)



After a little googling, I found out this :
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/7769

But on Debian, ulimit says Unlimitted so it can't be that.

I'm currently clearing the datastore :-/ Maybe it will help.


Has someone an idea ?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2005-08-30 Thread Julien Cornuwel
Matthew Toseland a écrit :

Does this happen after you start Freenet up, or had the node already
been running for a while? It's quite possible we have a slow FD leak
somewhere...

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote:


I'm currently clearing the datastore :-/ Maybe it will help.



The machine began to get very slow (huge memory usage, etc.) and the
error message appear after the first restart.

The problem is now solved (by flushing the datastore), thank you for
your answer.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]