[freenet-support] Some 0.7 questions
Hello. Can I ask a question on the new Freenet? I understand that version 0.7 is supposed to have two parts, an open network and a "darknet" and that at the moment only the "darknet" part is working and that to connect to it I have to get somebody else's node reference and add it to my node whilst the other person does the same with my reference. OK so far. 1. When I do this process and connect to a few nodes, are those the only nodes to which I will ever connect, or does the act of joining the network through those nodes then allow my node to learn about and connect to other nodes whose references I don't explicitly add myself? 2. If/when the open net appears, will it be completely separate from the darknet or will being in the darknet automatically join my node to the open network? Thank you in advance for any answers you can give. Kevin. -- All semiconductors work using smoke. Once you let the smoke out of them they stop working.
[freenet-support] Some 0.7 questions
Hello. Can I ask a question on the new Freenet? I understand that version 0.7 is supposed to have two parts, an open network and a darknet and that at the moment only the darknet part is working and that to connect to it I have to get somebody else's node reference and add it to my node whilst the other person does the same with my reference. OK so far. 1. When I do this process and connect to a few nodes, are those the only nodes to which I will ever connect, or does the act of joining the network through those nodes then allow my node to learn about and connect to other nodes whose references I don't explicitly add myself? 2. If/when the open net appears, will it be completely separate from the darknet or will being in the darknet automatically join my node to the open network? Thank you in advance for any answers you can give. Kevin. -- All semiconductors work using smoke. Once you let the smoke out of them they stop working. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 5107 - where?
Tried to download 5107 from freenetproject.org/snapshots but the download fails every time. I see from the release notes on the home page that this update changes the update scripts to get updates from a different location. Where is it please since /snapshots seems to be unusable. Thanks. Kevin. -- Faith is the virtue of sticking your fingers in your ears long enough to get a social validation of being ignorant.
[freenet-support] 5107 - where?
Tried to download 5107 from freenetproject.org/snapshots but the download fails every time. I see from the release notes on the home page that this update changes the update scripts to get updates from a different location. Where is it please since /snapshots seems to be unusable. Thanks. Kevin. -- Faith is the virtue of sticking your fingers in your ears long enough to get a social validation of being ignorant. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] V e r y s l o o o o o w download from freenetproject.org/snapshots
Trying to update to the latest node version by doing what I've done before, i.e. downloading freenet-latest.jar from freenetproject.org/snapshots but it's only arriving at 200B/s (Yes, B/s, not KB/s, I didn't miss out the K). This is slower than downloading a file from Freenet itself :-) Something wrong with the server?
[freenet-support] V e r y s l o o o o o w download from freenetproject.org/snapshots
Trying to update to the latest node version by doing what I've done before, i.e. downloading freenet-latest.jar from freenetproject.org/snapshots but it's only arriving at 200B/s (Yes, B/s, not KB/s, I didn't miss out the K). This is slower than downloading a file from Freenet itself :-) Something wrong with the server? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] Stable build 5075 - snapshots lagging behind?
FYI: The snapshots don't appear to have been updated. 08:15 GMT Sunday, and I'm still getting 5074 from freenet-latest.jar. Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad Sent: 13 March 2004 18:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Stable build 5075 Freenet stable build 5075 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. You can get the build via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users should upgrade. Major changes: * New algorithm for deciding which nodes to drop from the routing table. * New load measurement based on predicting future downlink bandwidth usage. Won't affect the node much at present, it could be combined with limits on local clients to prevent nodes from getting high messageSendTime's when they request lots of data. * Increase the default estimated file size (for rate limiting, load balancing, etc) to 350kB. * Tweaks to the rate limiting code. * Make logInputBytes and logOutputBytes work again. * Fix a rare NullPointerException when accepting a new FNP connection and the connection times out. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Millions(sic) of errors
Came home tonight to find that my node had crashed earlier on. Now after restarting I'm seeing millions (literally) of this message in the logfile: 18-Feb-2004 01:44:20 (freenet.ConnectionHandler, YThread-106, ERROR): Caught java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Should be mux protocol, was [EMAIL PROTECTED] in forceSendPacket java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Should be mux protocol, was [EMAIL PROTECTED] at freenet.RateLimitingViolationMessage.resolve(RateLimitingViolationMessage.ja va:50) at freenet.PeerHandler.getPacket(PeerHandler.java:1092) at freenet.ConnectionHandler.forceSendPacket(ConnectionHandler.java:2170) at freenet.PeerHandler.sendSinglePacket(PeerHandler.java:1025) at freenet.PeerHandler.innerSendMessageAsync(PeerHandler.java:900) at freenet.PeerHandler.receivedRequest(PeerHandler.java:1771) at freenet.node.states.FNP.NewRequest.genReceived(NewRequest.java:67) at freenet.node.states.FNP.NewDataRequest.received(NewDataRequest.java:35) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:183) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:67) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.run(StandardMessageHandler.java:2 36) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.received(StandardMessageHandler.j ava:171) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.access$100(StandardMessageHandler .java:122) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler.handle(StandardMessageHandler.java:70) at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:395) In 15 minutes the logfile has reached 1.52GB (yes, GB, that wasn't a typo) with logging at the default level of normal, and it all seems to be this 'should be mux protocol' message. In the few moments it's taken to write this mail, the log is now up to 1.85GB. Aaah. something new now: 18-Feb-2004 01:55:32 (freenet.RateLimitingViolationMessage, Network writing thread, NORMAL): AARGH: couldn't send [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thousands of these too, and then the logfile seems to have stopped growing except for a few: 18-Feb-2004 01:57:39 (freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimator, YThread-203, NORMAL): Caught freenet.node.rt.EstimatorFormatException: Estimate 1088779 over max 100 reading tcp/[snip], sessions=1, presentations=3,1, ID=DSA([snip]), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5069 from FieldSet :( freenet.node.rt.EstimatorFormatException: Estimate 1088779 over max 100 at freenet.node.rt.RoutingPointStore$RoutingPoint.init(RoutingPointStore.java :93) at freenet.node.rt.RoutingPointStore.init(RoutingPointStore.java:351) at freenet.node.rt.HistoryKeepingRoutingPointStore.init(HistoryKeepingRouting PointStore.java:31) at freenet.node.rt.DecayingKeyspaceEstimator$DecayingKeyspaceEstimatorFactory.c reate(DecayingKeyspaceEstimator.java:851) at freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimator.init(StandardNodeEstimator.java:531) at freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimatorFactory.create(StandardNodeEstimatorFac tory.java:110) at freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimatorFactory.create(StandardNodeEstimatorFac tory.java:170) at freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable.reference(NGRoutingTable.java:463) at freenet.node.rt.FilterRoutingTable.reference(FilterRoutingTable.java:52) at freenet.node.Node.reference(Node.java:4863) at freenet.node.states.request.AwaitingStoreData.relayStoreData(AwaitingStoreDa ta.java:139) at freenet.node.states.request.AwaitingStoreData.receivedMessage(AwaitingStoreD ata.java:88) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at freenet.node.State.received(State.java:131) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:183) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:67) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.run(StandardMessageHandler.java:2 36) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.received(StandardMessageHandler.j ava:171) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.access$100(StandardMessageHandler .java:122) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler.handle(StandardMessageHandler.java:70) at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:395) at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:249) Logfile is now 1.98GB and not growing rapidly. What can cause this? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Failed to send IdentifyPacketMessage Errors
Seeing hundreds of these today, roughly between 1 and 4 per second: 03-Feb-2004 21:39:35 (freenet.IdentifyPacketMessage, YThread-42, NORMAL): Failed to send IdentifyPacketMessage: freenet.SendFailedException: Against peer DSA(removed) @ removed - Sent 0 bytes (1551 of packet in notifyDone (nonterminal) freenet.SendFailedException: Against peer DSA(removed) @ removed - Sent 0 bytes (1551 of packet in notifyDone (nonterminal) at freenet.PeerPacket.jobDone(PeerPacket.java:180) at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.terminate(MuxConnectionHandler.java:294) at freenet.PeerHandler.registerConnectionHandler(PeerHandler.java:650) at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.setPeerHandler(MuxConnectionHandler.java:152) at freenet.OpenConnectionManager.put(OpenConnectionManager.java:235) at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.registerOCM(MuxConnectionHandler.java:501) at freenet.interfaces.FreenetConnectionRunner.handle(FreenetConnectionRunner.ja va:141) at freenet.interfaces.PublicNIOInterface$ConnectionShell.run(PublicNIOInterface .java:150) at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:247) Does this mean anything, or is it just a glitch? I reseeded earlier on (the node wasn't transferring any data at all). Could reseeding have made this start happening? Kevin. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
No, permanent. The numbers have moved slightly since yesterday but they're
still good:
Uptime 35 hours.
Probability of success of an incoming request
22-Jan-2004 07:31:04
0 | 0.33023256
1 | 0.20754717
2 | 0.2094763
3 | 0.14257425
4 | 0.1953125
5 | 0.2006689
6 | 0.15882353
7 | 0.23024055
8 | 0.0941337
9 | 0.06840391
a | 0.078538105
b | 0.16099072
c | 0.25862068
d | 0.19318181
e | 0.22033899
f | 0.24892704
Max: 0.33023256
Most successful: 0
inboundConnectionRatio still ~85%
routingTime 15ms
outputBytesTrailerChunks/outputBytes=0.54
RAM usage creeping up: 200-240MB now (It'll probably OOM soon, as it's got
a 256MB limit.)
CPU still ~20%
Total amount of data transmitted/received 1,961 MiB/2,506 MiB
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 22 January 2004 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Your numbers are amazing, and far higher than mine or those of another
node I've been able to check. Is this a transient node?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 05:00:41PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
Been running this for 20 hours now, and I have to say it rocks :)
Splitfiles in Frost and Fuqid are coming down at a rate of about 10k/s,
about 15-20x the rate they were coming down a week ago and DBR freesites
that were slow to arrive are now arriving usually within a few minutes.
If you want stats, here's a few that seem useful. If you want more, just
ask as I don't know which are the most useful.
According to the connection manager page, in 20 hours it's transferred
1.1GB
up and 1.5GB down, way more than for the last few weeks (excepting the
brief
surge when 5054 was still small). Memory usage varies between 150-170MB,
CPU usage ~20% of an AMD 2500+.
Success probabilities are huge in comparison with previous builds:
Probability of success of an incoming request
21-Jan-2004 16:39:26
0 | 0.31746033
1 | 0.22285715
2 | 0.19723183
3 | 0.14285715
4 | 0.24358974
5 | 0.2173913
6 | 0.13824885
7 | 0.23214285
8 | 0.13261649
9 | 0.08004926
a | 0.07307172
b | 0.12169312
c | 0.26865673
d | 0.16981132
e | 0.26573426
f | 0.25
Max: 0.31746033
Most successful: 0
Last week these were all, without exception, 0.01.
inboundConnectionRatio is ~85%.
routingTime is ~17ms.
outputBytesTrailerChunks/outputBytes=0.58
Once again: nice job guys :)
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 20 January 2004 19:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. {snip}
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
So is there any other data I could send you that would help pinpoint just
why my node is working so (ludicrously) well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 22 January 2004 14:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
They are still ludicrous. In that they don't happen anywhere else.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 07:49:05AM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
No, permanent. The numbers have moved slightly since yesterday but
they're
still good:
Uptime 35 hours.
Probability of success of an incoming request
22-Jan-2004 07:31:04
0 | 0.33023256
1 | 0.20754717
2 | 0.2094763
3 | 0.14257425
4 | 0.1953125
5 | 0.2006689
6 | 0.15882353
7 | 0.23024055
8 | 0.0941337
9 | 0.06840391
a | 0.078538105
b | 0.16099072
c | 0.25862068
d | 0.19318181
e | 0.22033899
f | 0.24892704
Max: 0.33023256
Most successful: 0
inboundConnectionRatio still ~85%
routingTime 15ms
outputBytesTrailerChunks/outputBytes=0.54
RAM usage creeping up: 200-240MB now (It'll probably OOM soon, as it's
got
a 256MB limit.)
CPU still ~20%
Total amount of data transmitted/received 1,961 MiB/2,506 MiB
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 22 January 2004 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Your numbers are amazing, and far higher than mine or those of another
node I've been able to check. Is this a transient node?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 05:00:41PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
Been running this for 20 hours now, and I have to say it rocks :)
Splitfiles in Frost and Fuqid are coming down at a rate of about 10k/s,
about 15-20x the rate they were coming down a week ago and DBR freesites
that were slow to arrive are now arriving usually within a few minutes.
If you want stats, here's a few that seem useful. If you want more,
just
ask as I don't know which are the most useful.
According to the connection manager page, in 20 hours it's transferred
1.1GB
up and 1.5GB down, way more than for the last few weeks (excepting the
brief
surge when 5054 was still small). Memory usage varies between
150-170MB,
CPU usage ~20% of an AMD 2500+.
Success probabilities are huge in comparison with previous builds:
Probability of success of an incoming request
21-Jan-2004 16:39:26
0 | 0.31746033
1 | 0.22285715
2 | 0.19723183
3 | 0.14285715
4 | 0.24358974
5 | 0.2173913
6 | 0.13824885
7 | 0.23214285
8 | 0.13261649
9 | 0.08004926
a | 0.07307172
b | 0.12169312
c | 0.26865673
d | 0.16981132
e | 0.26573426
f | 0.25
Max: 0.31746033
Most successful: 0
Last week these were all, without exception, 0.01.
inboundConnectionRatio is ~85%.
routingTime is ~17ms.
outputBytesTrailerChunks/outputBytes=0.58
Once again: nice job guys :)
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 20 January 2004 19:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. {snip}
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Been running this for 20 hours now, and I have to say it rocks :)
Splitfiles in Frost and Fuqid are coming down at a rate of about 10k/s,
about 15-20x the rate they were coming down a week ago and DBR freesites
that were slow to arrive are now arriving usually within a few minutes.
If you want stats, here's a few that seem useful. If you want more, just
ask as I don't know which are the most useful.
According to the connection manager page, in 20 hours it's transferred 1.1GB
up and 1.5GB down, way more than for the last few weeks (excepting the brief
surge when 5054 was still small). Memory usage varies between 150-170MB,
CPU usage ~20% of an AMD 2500+.
Success probabilities are huge in comparison with previous builds:
Probability of success of an incoming request
21-Jan-2004 16:39:26
0 | 0.31746033
1 | 0.22285715
2 | 0.19723183
3 | 0.14285715
4 | 0.24358974
5 | 0.2173913
6 | 0.13824885
7 | 0.23214285
8 | 0.13261649
9 | 0.08004926
a | 0.07307172
b | 0.12169312
c | 0.26865673
d | 0.16981132
e | 0.26573426
f | 0.25
Max: 0.31746033
Most successful: 0
Last week these were all, without exception, 0.01.
inboundConnectionRatio is ~85%.
routingTime is ~17ms.
outputBytesTrailerChunks/outputBytes=0.58
Once again: nice job guys :)
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 20 January 2004 19:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. {snip}
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
RE: [freenet-support] Number of stable nodes
Slightly different here, my node is almost up to its limit: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 507 (471/36/512) Number of distinct nodes connected 427 Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lefebvre Hervé Sent: 18 January 2004 11:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Number of stable nodes -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dimanche 18 Janvier 2004 09:22, S wrote: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 417 (379/38/512) Number of distinct nodes connected 333 Same here : Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 350 (329/21/512) - -- Hervé LEFEBVRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFACmnD/iEFFjpUUjMRAi1VAJ425dGu/JNcURFZVItqcJep3uoBzQCcCtkc EEzZA7g1krOFUVniJndhs6k= =FTpj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Build 5060?
I see on the web interface page: Build: 5058 (Latest: 5060) freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar still has the same timestamp as when 5058 came out (13-Jan-2004 18:20) I don't see any 5060 nodes in the OCM or node status pages. What can cause this? Kevin. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
RE: [freenet-support] Interpreting error messages
Thank you :) Kevin. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Log entry
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 7 in queue, 3156 millis since enqueued last item, 483698 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. JVM Version: Sun 1.4.2_01-b06 OS: Win2KPro SP4 with all MS updates. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] An amusing statistic
I looked at the general page of the web interface and was a little amused to see the following figure: Current recommended request interval sent to client nodes 1.9478309723356009E9ms That's roughly 22.5 *days* :D Kevin. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Suddenly unable to connect to network
Highest ARK here is 227, another ten in the range 50-150 and the rest between 1 and 4. Number of node references 49 Contacted node references 22 Node references requesting ARKs 21 Since my last mail to the list (70 minutes ago) I've had the grand total of 2 inbound requests hit my node. At least I'm not QueryRejecting ;) Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Troed Sångberg Sent: 30 November 2003 21:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Suddenly unable to connect to network On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:43:04 -, Pete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are my stats for ARK's I doubt you're the only one having issues Number of node references 87 Contacted node references 44 Node references requesting ARKs 46 This is not a good sign, my highest ARK is 153 I, on the other hand, do not have these problems. My transferrate in FUQID is low, but it was low since a few stable NGR-snapshots back as well. Frost actually seems to work better with classic routing as compared to NGR. I also reseeded when upgrading the snapshot [how many who do not read this list will not do that .. ] Number of node references 50 Contacted node references 33 Node references requesting ARKs 14 I have one ARK at 46, and at 17. The rest are at 4 and below. The absolute majority are at 1. The node version histogram also shows a few old nodes still referenced: Fred,0.5,1.47,5037 |= Fred,0.5,1.47,5039 |== Fred,0.5,1.47,5041 |= Fred,0.5,1.47,5042 | Fred,0.5,1.47,5043 | Fred,0.5,1.48,5046 | Fred,0.6,1.47,6364 |=== Fred,0.6,1.47,6367 |=== regards, Troed ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5030
Gah, replied to the wrong damn thread. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Bennett Sent: 25 November 2003 22:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5030 FYI: After running this version for 50 mins, all activity abruptly stopped. Input and output went from 56k/20k to 5k/0k over a period of 2 minutes. No response from localhost: either yet the node was apparently still running as there were dozens of these log entries: (freenet.node.states.request.ReceivingReply, YThread-1008, NORMAL): Receiving connection died in freenet.node.states.request.ReceivingReply: etc.. followed by quite literally hundreds like this: (freenet.message.DataRequest, YThread-2263, NORMAL): Long messageInitialStateTime 13625 etc... and then a section with the occasional Long messageInitialStateTime interspersed with (freenet.Ticker, Ticker immediate execution thread, NORMAL): On restarting the node, rates have gone back to normal. Lets see how long it stays up... Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad Sent: 01 November 2003 17:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5030 Freenet stable build 5030 is out. Major changes: * Makes 5029 mandatory. * Improvements to the Open Connections page especially in PeerHandler mode. * Improved plausible deniability for high HTL values. * Increased default size of failure table to 20,000. This should make it much more effective, and only use around 2.5MB more memory. * Don't try to use seednodes with no address to connect to. * Don't write deprecated options such as the old overall bandwidthLimit to the config file. * Don't show the key request form in simple mode, it confuses newbies. * Support relative ?date= in fproxy. Example: http://127.0.0.1:/SSK%40Sc6qV~D6iFhaYord6HtbjJ8MaEYPAgM/YoYo//?date=-1we ek * Finally remove the old datastore code, fix lots of eclipse warnings, other code tidying up Use the update.sh or freenet-webinstall.exe utility to upgrade, or get it from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar (replace your existing freenet.jar). By the time you read this mail, certainly within 20 minutes, the snapshots will have been updated. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5041
FYI: After running this version for 50 mins, all activity abruptly stopped. Input and output went from 56k/20k to 5k/0k over a period of 2 minutes. No response from localhost: either yet the node was apparently still running as there were dozens of these log entries: (freenet.node.states.request.ReceivingReply, YThread-1008, NORMAL): Receiving connection died in freenet.node.states.request.ReceivingReply: etc.. followed by quite literally hundreds like this: (freenet.message.DataRequest, YThread-2263, NORMAL): Long messageInitialStateTime 13625 etc... and then a section with the occasional Long messageInitialStateTime interspersed with (freenet.Ticker, Ticker immediate execution thread, NORMAL): On restarting the node, rates have gone back to normal. Lets see how long it stays up... Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad Sent: 25 November 2003 20:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5041 Freenet stable build 5041 is now available. Upgrade using update.sh or freenet-webinstall.exe, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet.jar . Changelog: * Major continuing work on routing: ** Contact the least accessed node every 30 seconds with a recently requested key. This is estimated to add 3kqph to load, but is very important given the next item. ** New nodes in the routing table get pessimistic estimators. So routing is not dominated by new nodes any more. They will get routed to once they have demonstrated their abilities through the above mechanism. ** Try to manage routing table churn: accept new nodes into the routing table from any wierd source if we have less than 40 available, not backed off, nodes. If we have more than that, do probabilistic referencing for StoreData's, and don't borrow refs from requests. ** Impose a network level maximum file size of 1MB. This should make multiplexing easier, simplify code, and prevent some bad behaviours that might be used for traffic analysis. ** Make the global estimate, the request failure time, used in routing, depend on the key AND the filesize. This prevents bad routing of files of non-typical sizes. ** Always reset the datasource when we serve data from the store. ** Other minor changes. * When we do a request with 'skip datastore' enabled, don't actually delete the file from the datastore, just ignore it. * Show the version of each node on the inbound requests page. Improve the open connections and node reference status pages. More diagnostics. Etc. * Lots more bugfixes, logging changes, and other minor improvements. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5039
Since upgrading to 5039, inserting has slowed to a crawl. It's taken 8 hours to insert a single 10MB splitfile, where this would have taken approximately 30 mins with 5038. Most of the insert threads were timing out. Some popular freesites (e.g. YoYo) arrive quite quickly but splitfile downloads all seem to fail with threads timing out. My outbound bandwidth has been pegged at 20k with an average of around 150 connections trying to transmit at the same time during this 8hr period whereas inbound bandwidth has been running at about 5k. There have also been quite a lot of the 'Implausible report' and 'waited more than 5 minutes in NIOIS.read()' errors, more than with 5038. There was also this error which I've not seen before: (freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement$KeyInputStreamImpl, Finalizer, ERROR): Please close() me manually in finalizer. Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad Sent: 19 November 2003 16:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5039 Freenet stable build 5039 is now available. Update your freenet node using update.sh, freenet-webinstall.exe, or the jar (save it over freenet.jar): http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . Don't forget to restart the node (you will need to shut it down before updating on Windows, but the rabbit icon may do this for you). This build turns off rejecting queries based on output bandwidth usage, a feature that is unnecessary (we have other ways of limiting bandwidth usage) and counterproductive to routing. We have been recently tweaking various settings to try to improve routing, reenabling it was an experiment, as there are several theories as to what exactly is going on on Freenet. It was useful, but we now think that disabling it will yield better routing. The corresponding unstable build is 6341. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall.
Hmmm. At a first glance this seems to be working. After 5 mins there were 8 incoming connections (though none were transferring) and about 60 outbound, some of which were transferring. No instances of the non-listening port error this time, but to confuse matters further there are now a lot of TCP non-syn/non-ack packet on invalid connection. Packet has been dropped entries, one every few seconds. If I cross-reference an entry like this, it corresponds with an outgoing connection that is already open and in some cases already transferring. Weird. I'll leave it running as-is while I go to work and check it again when I get home. The firewall is Norton Internet Security 2003, but I have no clue how it knows if a port is listening or not. Thanks, Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward J. Huff Sent: 17 November 2003 00:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall. On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 17:51, Kevin Bennett wrote: ... BUT. This is with the firewall switched off. If I switch the firewall on the number of connections to listenPort dwindles over time to 0 and then never increases, and the firewall log fills up with thousands of those TCP Syn Packet on non-listening port. Packet has been dropped errors. Try this: Switch the firewall on. Then restart fred. The firewall might need to be running when the listen begins. But I don't quite understand how that could be, because I don't think any packets are sent out when listen begins. How does the firewall know the port isn't listening, anyway? What firewall is it? -- Ed Huff ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall.
Yes, it's Win2K, and yes, netstat -a gives myhostname:0 instead of 0.0.0.0:0 with netstat -a -n. I've currently got 300+ entries connected to the listenPort and a fair number are transferring data so yes again, my node is currently working well. BUT. This is with the firewall switched off. If I switch the firewall on the number of connections to listenPort dwindles over time to 0 and then never increases, and the firewall log fills up with thousands of those TCP Syn Packet on non-listening port. Packet has been dropped errors. There are, so far as I can tell, three things which might have changed to cause this behaviour: 1. The OS. I can rule that out since I haven't run any updates during the period that this started to happen. 2. The firewall. Again, no changes to the firewall were made. 3. Fred. This is the only thing that's changed. When running 5028, the unstable builds until NGR was merged into stable, and then 5029/30, everything was working as expected. Then I changed to 5031 and bang, no incoming connections. (Or it might have been 5032. I'm not sure exactly when this happened as I only noticed it by accident when checking the connection manager page, something which I didn't do more than once or twice a day before this happened.) To me this suggests that the problem lies somewhere with the way that Fred is listening, but if not it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong about something :) Thanks for your help so far, Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward J. Huff Sent: 16 November 2003 21:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall. On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 03:37, Kevin Bennett wrote: I only used the -a switch. If I add -n as well it becomes: TCP 0.0.0.0:49247 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING. and many TCP myIP:49247foreignIP:port ESTABLISHED ... I suppose that 0.0.0.0:0 means the same thing as 0.0.0.0:*, i.e. that it will accept connections on any IP and any port. Is this windows? Try without -n. Does 0.0.0.0:0 change to myhostname:0? That would be kind of weird, but MS$ has done weirder things. On the other hand, it might be that the situation is different now and you get 0.0.0.0:0 with -a -n and with -a. If you have established connections on your listenPort, they must be incoming so your system seems to be working. Is the firewall on? -- Ed Huff ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according to firewall.
I noticed that once again I have no incoming connections. Looking at my software firewall logs I see a lot of the following entries (dozens per minute): TCP Syn Packet on non-listening port. Packet has been dropped Source IP address: removed Destination IP address: removed TCP Source Port: 4991 TCP Destination Port: 49247 TCP Message Flags: 0x0002 Adding an 'allow all TCP connections to use this port' rule makes no difference. If I switch off the software firewall (that's okay as I'm behind a hardware wall too) then I straight away get plenty of incoming connections. So for some reason the firewall seems to think that Freenet isn't listening on 49247 despite the fact that it obviously is. Does this mean that Freenet isn't advertising its port's 'openness' correctly? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Some advice on thread numbers etc please
Would someone be so kind as to recommend optimum settings (assuming such things exist) for maximum threads and maximum connections for a machine connected to a 512down/256 up ADSL connection? The box the node runs on and the connection it uses is used for little except being a node and some browsing, and has a 20GB store. Thanks. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall.
According to netstat -a, 49247 is listening: TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING TCPmyhostname:49247 myhostname:0 LISTENING with the firewall on, but those are the only entries for that port. If I disable the firewall I immediately see many like this: TCPmyhostname:49247 somebodyelse:portnumber ESTABLISHED The reason I ask is that this seemed to happen when updating from either 5030 to 5031 or from 5031 to 5032. Nothing was changed in the firewall conf, but all of a sudden I started to see many of the log entries I mentioned and ended up with no incoming connections so I wondered if maybe something had broken. Thanks, Kevin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niklas Bergh Sent: 15 November 2003 18:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according tofirewall. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Freenet Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 3:01 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet port not listening according to firewall. I noticed that once again I have no incoming connections. Looking at my software firewall logs I see a lot of the following entries (dozens per minute): TCP Syn Packet on non-listening port. Packet has been dropped Source IP address: removed Destination IP address: removed TCP Source Port: 4991 TCP Destination Port: 49247 TCP Message Flags: 0x0002 Adding an 'allow all TCP connections to use this port' rule makes no difference. If I switch off the software firewall (that's okay as I'm behind a hardware wall too) then I straight away get plenty of incoming connections. This definitely indicates to me that the firewall is the problem. So for some reason the firewall seems to think that Freenet isn't listening on 49247 despite the fact that it obviously is. Does this mean that Freenet isn't advertising its port's 'openness' correctly? Hardly, applications doesn't need to do any kind of 'advertising'. Applications just open a port and the OS does the rest. What does the appropriate OS tools (netstat for instance) tell you about which ports that is open?. Any differences in the output with the firewall on and off? /N ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] The logfile told me to report this
TransferInsert source connection died! Report if occurs often. and TransferInsert source sent bad data! Report if occurs often. Both have been appearing many times since updating to 5034. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] No incoming connections
A few days ago I used to have a pretty good balance of incoming and outgoing connections. Then all of a sudden I no longer had any incoming connections at all, and have had none since. I have tried a few simple things like stopping and restarting the node, reseeding etc, but this has not made any difference. I've also noticed when restarting the node that all attempts to announce to other nodes fail. The failures are usually down to No open connections and can't contact node (terminal) with the occasional QueryRejected. It's a permanent node, 5031, Win2K. Any suggestions as to what I can do to see if it's down to my node or just network conditions? Thanks, Kevin. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] No incoming connections
Now that's strange. All of a sudden I'm back to a normal spread of in and outbound. Ah well, weirder things have happened I expect. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] Viewing rotated logs - Windows Freenet launcher needs updating
I've switched to using rotating logs, and noticed that whilst the web pages show the correct log under the 'Recent Logs' link, the system tray icon is showing my old freenet.log instead of the time-rotated ones. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] How to tell if my node is working well?
I've been running a node for a couple of weeks now and am wondering how to tell if my node is a) well integrated into the network and b) filling requests that are sent to it. There is a bewildering array of graphs and stats, and I have no idea which ones will give an indication of those 2 things. Also, in the node reference status page there are some estimate figure that aren't clear to me. 'Lowest global time estimate', 'Highest global time estimate' and the first column after the peer address is 'Last estimate'. Estimates of what? Thanks. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
