[freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Level 13
> Oh what version was it running? I'm fairly sure this has > been fixed > recently. Yep, it was still Build #1185. Like I (probably) said, it'd been a few weeks... (there was some exquisite classical music on 0.5, and my resources can't run both versions at the same time for too long...).

[freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Level 13
Here's the relevant part of the wrapper.log (at least I think it's the right part, as it's the one that's different from old entries when the node was running fine): INFO | jvm 1| 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: Error in WrapperListener.start callback.

[freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Level 13
I'm having problems with starting my Freenet 0.7 node. This is the output of the start-up console window: ### Starting Freenet The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service is starting . The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service could not be started. A system

[freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Level 13
I'm having problems with starting my Freenet 0.7 node. This is the output of the start-up console window: ### Starting Freenet The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service is starting . The Freenet 0.7 darknet- service could not be started. A system

Re: [freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Level 13
Here's the relevant part of the wrapper.log (at least I think it's the right part, as it's the one that's different from old entries when the node was running fine): INFO | jvm 1| 2008/12/11 12:31:13 | WrapperManager Error: Error in WrapperListener.start callback.

Re: [freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Level 13
Oh what version was it running? I'm fairly sure this has been fixed recently. Yep, it was still Build #1185. Like I (probably) said, it'd been a few weeks... (there was some exquisite classical music on 0.5, and my resources can't run both versions at the same time for too long...). :)

[freenet-support] Newbie to 0.7

2008-11-29 Thread Level 13
I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of 0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the restrictive default settings about the memory and such). Now, to my questions... After one

[freenet-support] Newbie to 0.7

2008-11-29 Thread Level 13
I've installed 0.7 yesterday (finally :) but I'm not getting rid of 0.5 just yet). I like the fact that it's not eating that much of the computer resources as 0.5 (but then again, I've pretty much kept the restrictive default settings about the memory and such). Now, to my questions... After one

[freenet-support] Ports to forward, hostname (dyndns)

2008-11-01 Thread Level 13
Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly (so two ports here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? How about the dyndns hostname, where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the same as it was on 0.5,

[freenet-support] Ports to forward, hostname (dyndns)

2008-11-01 Thread Level 13
Is it enough to portforward listen-port and opennet-listen-port on your NAT router in order for a 0.7 node to work properly (so two ports here as opposed to one port in 0.5)? How about the dyndns hostname, where do you have to put it (that is, if this function is still the same as it was on 0.5,

[freenet-support] Changing ports etc.

2008-09-09 Thread Level 13
Is there a short how-to for Freenet 0.7 installation for those who are switching from 0.5? Especially I'm looking for info about: -how to change the default ports (which are already taken by other services on my server, and are not to be used at all), for local access as well as the one visible on

[freenet-support] Changing ports etc.

2008-09-08 Thread Level 13
Is there a short how-to for Freenet 0.7 installation for those who are switching from 0.5? Especially I'm looking for info about: -how to change the default ports (which are already taken by other services on my server, and are not to be used at all), for local access as well as the one visible on

[freenet-support] Running both versions at the same time?

2008-05-29 Thread Level 13
Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)?

[freenet-support] Running both versions at the same time?

2008-05-29 Thread Level 13
Would it be possible/feasible to run both 0.5 and 0.7 versions on the same computer (for a while)? Or could there be some conflicts between the two (and probably significant strain on system resources)? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] A maximum of 40 connections on XP SP3?

2008-05-22 Thread Level 13
My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel, e.g. Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90) The only thing that was

[freenet-support] A maximum of 40 connections on XP SP3?

2008-05-22 Thread Level 13
My node (version 0.5) is supposed to allow 90 concurrent open connections. However, in the last week or so I've only seen 40 listed connections in the Open Connections segment of node's control panel, e.g. Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 40 (0/40/90) The only thing that was

[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-05-03 Thread Level 13
Forgive my ignorance, but where do I change the allotted memory for Freenet? Couldn't find it under Configure in the menu, and neither in freenet.ini. > > As for the memory - I haven't changed any settings about memory. The > > "Memory Allocation" (in Environment section of web interface) says:

[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-28 Thread Level 13
> You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately! I know, I was merely joking. :) > What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued > requests and/or > inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using > now? > > If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying,

Re: [freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-28 Thread Level 13
You tell me. We wouldn't do it deliberately! I know, I was merely joking. :) What is the node doing at the time? Do you have any queued requests and/or inserts? Have you tried giving the node more memory? How much is it using now? If it IS a memory problem then it's worrying, vinyl1 also

[freenet-support] CPU at 100 %, frequent restarts needed

2008-04-25 Thread Level 13
Some time ago, I had to restart my node once every two weeks or so, because its CPU consumption would grow over time -- and after reaching 90 % or more rendering the computer useless. However, lately these things occur very often. The node starts consuming more and more CPU resources, pushing it

[freenet-support] My node won't start anymore after the computer crashed

2007-11-22 Thread Level 13
Well, I've deleted my Freenet store completely. Didn't help. Tried to run UpdateSnapshot.exe. It downloaded something and maybe updated it (no errors). Didn't help. Downloaded freenet-webinstall.exe, tried to run it (for a reinstall, I suppose), but I only received: "I could not find a compatible

[freenet-support] Why does it take longer to start

2007-11-03 Thread Level 13
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to 90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up (that is, until the animated tray icon becomes blue after you start the node). Why is

[freenet-support] Why does it take longer to start

2007-11-03 Thread Level 13
A while ago I increased the resources for my freenet node (from 40 to 90 connections, and datastore from 1 GB to 5 GB). It used to take a few seconds to start my node, now it's like 1-2 minutes before it's up (that is, until the animated tray icon becomes blue after you start the node). Why is

[freenet-support] Load over 100 percent?

2007-06-01 Thread Level 13
Today I've noticed that on my node's status page it says: Build 5107 ... Load: ... 137% It never went over 100 % before, so what does it mean? I did keep Frost running overnight...

[freenet-support] Load over 100 percent?

2007-06-01 Thread Level 13
Today I've noticed that on my node's status page it says: Build 5107 ... Load: ... 137% It never went over 100 % before, so what does it mean? I did keep Frost running overnight... ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] How to make use of Java 1.5.0 instead of 1.4.2

2007-01-20 Thread Level 13
Never mind - I completely overlooked the fact that there's another .ini file (FLaunch.ini) where you can change this. :) All fine now.

[freenet-support] How to make use of Java 1.5.0 instead of 1.4.2

2007-01-19 Thread Level 13
I've recently updated from JRE1.4.2 to JRE1.5.0. However, if I check the Environment section of Freenet web interface, the line "JVM Version" still claims my node is using 1.4.2_10-b03. How come it didn't acquire 1.5.0 - did I miss to change something?

[freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM

2007-01-04 Thread Level 13
About JVM update - I saw that there are some security issues with my current version, so I thought it might be wise to update. > Yes, 5107 was the final release in the .5 version of Freenet. > I don't see any reason to update the Java release if your .5 server is > working OK. A later release

Re: [freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM

2007-01-04 Thread Level 13
About JVM update - I saw that there are some security issues with my current version, so I thought it might be wise to update. Yes, 5107 was the final release in the .5 version of Freenet. I don't see any reason to update the Java release if your .5 server is working OK. A later release

[freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM

2007-01-03 Thread Level 13
How can I tell if I have the latest version of 0.5 branch installed? The information I get in the web interface is as follows: Node Version0.5 Protocol VersionSTABLE-1.51 Build Number5107 CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.134 How about the version of JVM? I'm currently using

[freenet-support] Which is the latest 0.5 version; Which Java VM

2007-01-03 Thread Level 13
How can I tell if I have the latest version of 0.5 branch installed? The information I get in the web interface is as follows: Node Version0.5 Protocol VersionSTABLE-1.51 Build Number5107 CVS Revision1.90.2.50.2.134 How about the version of JVM? I'm currently using

[freenet-support] Freenet (0.5, Build 5106) has trouble with time transitions

2006-10-29 Thread Level 13
It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by alarms indicating 100 % CPU usage, and found out it was being caused by Freenet, so I restarted it. Obviously it has problems when summer/winter time transitions occur. It's only twice a year, but thought I should mention it.

[freenet-support] Freenet (0.5, Build 5106) has trouble with time transitions

2006-10-29 Thread Level 13
It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by alarms indicating 100 % CPU usage, and found out it was being caused by Freenet, so I restarted it. Obviously it has problems when summer/winter time transitions occur. It's only twice a year, but thought I should mention it.

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

2006-07-29 Thread Level 13
What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7? Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from "open connections" on my node's control panel? Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different?

[freenet-support] From 0.5 to 0.7

2006-07-28 Thread Level 13
What's the best plan for upgrading from 0.5 to 0.7? Is it still so that in order to use 0.7 you have to know a node that's already in the network? If so, can I simply pick any node from open connections on my node's control panel? Is the content under 0.7 the same or completely different?

[freenet-support] Switching it off for a while

2006-07-27 Thread Level 13
That's not very encouraging. Perhaps there should be some flag available to let other nodes know that one of them is just "temporarily unavailable". Or maybe an option for a "3rd party" server where the traffic requests would be rerouted - and the "temporarily unavailable" answer given out (the

Re: [freenet-support] Switching it off for a while

2006-07-27 Thread Level 13
That's not very encouraging. Perhaps there should be some flag available to let other nodes know that one of them is just temporarily unavailable. Or maybe an option for a 3rd party server where the traffic requests would be rerouted - and the temporarily unavailable answer given out (the 3rd

[freenet-support] Switching it off for a while

2006-07-26 Thread Level 13
I was wondering, what are the possible consequences if one switches their Freenet node off for a while (say when going on vacation etc.)? I mean, is there a minimum limit as to when a node is considered "dead"? So if it comes back online in e.g. 1 month, will it be a whole new "discovery" for it,

[freenet-support] Switching it off for a while

2006-07-26 Thread Level 13
I was wondering, what are the possible consequences if one switches their Freenet node off for a while (say when going on vacation etc.)? I mean, is there a minimum limit as to when a node is considered dead? So if it comes back online in e.g. 1 month, will it be a whole new discovery for it, or

[freenet-support] 923 current connections

2006-06-05 Thread Level 13
Upon issuing netstat -s on my server this morning I found out there were 923 current connections established. After shutting down Fuqid (1.5) and Freenet (build 5106), the number dropped to 47. How could have this happened? The maximum connection limit on my Freenet node is 40, while Fuqid has 30

[freenet-support] 923 current connections

2006-06-05 Thread Level 13
Upon issuing netstat -s on my server this morning I found out there were 923 current connections established. After shutting down Fuqid (1.5) and Freenet (build 5106), the number dropped to 47. How could have this happened? The maximum connection limit on my Freenet node is 40, while Fuqid has 30

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Level 13
> > One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more > > "humanly readable"? Currently my setting is "logLevel=Normal". The log > > seems pretty "raw", though. > > For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse... For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp

RE: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Level 13
One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more humanly readable? Currently my setting is logLevel=Normal. The log seems pretty raw, though. For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse... For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers' etc.

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Level 13
In this section of FAQ http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at "node.ipAddressOverride" and "node.listenPort". However, I don't have these entries in configuration file; I only have "ipAddress=..." (where I used

[freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Level 13
In this section of FAQ http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at node.ipAddressOverride and node.listenPort. However, I don't have these entries in configuration file; I only have ipAddress=... (where I used to

[freenet-support] Re: What to do after switching ISP

2006-04-23 Thread Level 13
> > Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in > > "ipAddres=" instead of putting my external IP there? > > Yes. Done. BTW, I still have access to my old line until the end of the month. Is there anything I can do overthere to somehow "transfer" the already known

RE: [freenet-support] Re: What to do after switching ISP

2006-04-23 Thread Level 13
Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in ipAddres= instead of putting my external IP there? Yes. Done. BTW, I still have access to my old line until the end of the month. Is there anything I can do overthere to somehow transfer the already known connections to the

[freenet-support] Re: What to do after switching ISP

2006-04-21 Thread Level 13
Well, I've had my DynDNS address before... but didn't use it with Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in "ipAddres=" instead of putting my external IP there? If so - if I do this now, will the whole node have to start from scratch again? Yes, I'm behind a NAT

[freenet-support] Re: What to do after switching ISP

2006-04-21 Thread Level 13
Well, I've had my DynDNS address before... but didn't use it with Freenet. So all I would have to do was put this DynDNS address in ipAddres= instead of putting my external IP there? If so - if I do this now, will the whole node have to start from scratch again? Yes, I'm behind a NAT

[freenet-support] What to do after switching ISP

2006-04-14 Thread Level 13
I just switched my ISP, hence I have a new IP now. Is there any way to speed up the process of my node getting to know the others? That is, it seems like the freenet considers my node a new one (since it's on a new IP), and I'd like to inherit the credentials I had before (for the lack of a better

[freenet-support] Re: Overloaded or Node Down

2005-11-24 Thread Level 13
> Sure, but I strongly recommend you not uninstall ZoneAlarm on a windows > box. Unless you just install linux instead. :) No, I am definitely going to leave ZoneAlarm where it is. I guess I'll just have to restart it every now and then. Another question about memory allocation. Node information

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Overloaded or Node Down

2005-11-24 Thread Level 13
Sure, but I strongly recommend you not uninstall ZoneAlarm on a windows box. Unless you just install linux instead. :) No, I am definitely going to leave ZoneAlarm where it is. I guess I'll just have to restart it every now and then. Another question about memory allocation. Node information

[freenet-support] Overloaded or Node Down

2005-11-21 Thread Level 13
Every now and then I notice that FUQID displays the message Overloaded Or Node Down (in place where it's usually written ACTIVE). If I deactivate it, restart Freenet node, and activate Fuqid again, it works again. Also, issuing netstat -s before and after the restart: before there were like 240

[freenet-support] Re: Overloaded or Node Down

2005-11-21 Thread Level 13
Normally it happens when you are using too many threads. Try to use little less. I don't think I'm using too many threads. As for Freenet, I've limited the connections to 40: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 37 (11/26/40) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 39 (22/17)

[freenet-support] Re: Overloaded or Node Down

2005-11-21 Thread Level 13
Then I guess it was either eMule's fault or Zone Alarm's. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or

[freenet-support] Which java VM, how to make it secure...

2005-10-11 Thread Level 13
I've recently upgraded to the latest version of Freenet (5105). The Java VM I'm using is 1.4.2_07-b05. Should there be any improvement if I upgraded it to a newer version? Furthermore... If I want to be more restrictive about allowing java*.exe to access the internet, do I just copy java.exe and

[freenet-support] Which java VM, how to make it secure...

2005-10-11 Thread Level 13
I've recently upgraded to the latest version of Freenet (5105). The Java VM I'm using is 1.4.2_07-b05. Should there be any improvement if I upgraded it to a newer version? Furthermore... If I want to be more restrictive about allowing java*.exe to access the internet, do I just copy java.exe and

[freenet-support] Re: Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe eating RAM

2005-10-10 Thread Level 13
I'm using the last version of 5.5 series (freeware version). I'm somehow reluctant about installing 6 since I've heard so much bad things about this version.

[freenet-support] Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe eating RAM

2005-10-10 Thread Level 13
I've noticed that ever since I started running my Freenet node, the Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe process is literally eating memory. It goes up to 700 MB. Whenever the system decides to allocate more memory to vsmon.exe, the whole system is stuck until the process is finished (I suppose re-writing the

[freenet-support] Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe eating RAM

2005-10-10 Thread Level 13
I've noticed that ever since I started running my Freenet node, the Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe process is literally eating memory. It goes up to 700 MB. Whenever the system decides to allocate more memory to vsmon.exe, the whole system is stuck until the process is finished (I suppose re-writing the

[freenet-support] Re: Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe eating RAM

2005-10-10 Thread Level 13
I'm using the last version of 5.5 series (freeware version). I'm somehow reluctant about installing 6 since I've heard so much bad things about this version. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Upgrading freenet on Windows 2000

2005-10-09 Thread Level 13
On the website, it says, After installing Freenet, Windows users can upgrade to the latest daily Freenet "snapshot" release by clicking on "Update Snapshot" in the Freenet section of their Start menu. However, if I choose "Update Snapshot" on my server, I will get the following dialog box just

[freenet-support] Upgrading freenet on Windows 2000

2005-10-09 Thread Level 13
On the website, it says, After installing Freenet, Windows users can upgrade to the latest daily Freenet snapshot release by clicking on Update Snapshot in the Freenet section of their Start menu. However, if I choose Update Snapshot on my server, I will get the following dialog box just prior

[freenet-support] The new version and UDP

2005-09-18 Thread Level 13
I know it probably sounds silly, but for some time I've been using a router that doesn't support UDP port forwarding, and I probably won't change it any time soon... I see the 0.7 is switching from TCP to UDP. What happens to those unlucky users who can't use UDP? Should we just stop using Freenet

[freenet-support] The new version and UDP

2005-09-18 Thread Level 13
I know it probably sounds silly, but for some time I've been using a router that doesn't support UDP port forwarding, and I probably won't change it any time soon... I see the 0.7 is switching from TCP to UDP. What happens to those unlucky users who can't use UDP? Should we just stop using Freenet

[freenet-support] Re: Virtual Memory Minimum Too Low

2005-03-11 Thread Level 13
Well, the machine is running: -Freenet -TorrentStorm -eMule -Kiwi SyslogD -Filezilla FTP server -VNC server -and a few other user applications (command prompt, Firefox, Zone Alarm etc.) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

[freenet-support] Virtual Memory Minimum Too Low

2005-03-10 Thread Level 13
I started my freenet node again yesterday, and today I got the pop-up message (also in event log): *** Event Type: Information Event Source: Application Popup Event Category: None Event ID: 26 Date: 2005-03-10 Time: 09:28:15 Description: Application popup:

RE: [freenet-support] Shut down until I clear some things up

2005-03-09 Thread Level 13
Thanks for all the info, I suppose the maximum number of connections should do the trick. I'll try the settings you recommend, and let you know. As per Freenet messing with P2P apps -- is there any way that it might somehow want to use ports such as 4662, 6881, etc., in a few days, thus preventing

[freenet-support] How to access freesites within LAN

2005-03-09 Thread Level 13
Let's say there are two computers in the local area network: Computer_A and Computer_B. Computer_B is a freenet node. What precisely do I have to change if I want to access freesites on Computer_A as well? Is it only adding A's IP/hostname to config file: fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,localhost,Computer_A

RE: [freenet-support] How to access freesites within LAN

2005-03-09 Thread Level 13
Thanks! Works great now. :) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Shut down until I clear some things up

2005-03-08 Thread Level 13
I shut down my freenet node today after a little less than a week of its running. The main reasons are low speed and resource hog-geness. I read the other day that after at least two days, the speed of freenet gets to normal. However, after almost one week the speed was still pretty low on my end