[freenet-support] New sudo on Gnetoo breaks freenet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seee bug 71835 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71835 . The fix is to uncomment this line: Defaults:%wheel !env_reset and Freenet will run. This may not be the best answer though. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBotuBhctESbvQ8ZwRAsYyAKCPzxO+DeVtKLYvXKzk7Q2QXumGRgCdECVI I4WYAgJrxcmloZBxEHZUiew= =Rnjf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] I need to limit the amount of memory java uses.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve wrote:
I've read that there should be a parameter that limits java's mem
usage in /usr/bin/start-freenet.sh. Mine seems to lack that parameter.
here is a copy of my start-freenet.sh:
#!/bin/bash
# This script is a companion script to the Gentoo freenet init script.
# Logs freenet's stdout and stderr for debugging needs.
#
# Author: Brandon Low [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
${JAVA} ${JAVA_ARGS} freenet.node.Main -p /etc/freenet.conf \
/var/freenet/freenet.stdout.log 2
/var/freenet/freenet.stderr.log
echo $!
You must be a Gentoo user like me. Look in /etc/conf.d/freenet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBJMu/hctESbvQ8ZwRAu96AJ9yZ1FvTcgezNdF2N9UgxAqUxi5vgCeMdn0
U7Ep+ybfTDiWjuvwFiKiL0E=
=NwIu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: anonymity(NOT)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Derbyshire wrote: On 4 Aug 2004 at 15:38, Mika Hirvonen wrote: Yes, it's trivial for Them to know whether someone runs a Freenet node or not, but knowing what the user was doing with that node is an another matter (assuming that the node is physically secure, has encrypted drives and the user is invulnerable to rubber-hose cryptography). Erm ... rubber-hose cryptography? WTH is that? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually it should be rubber-hose cryptanalysis from http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/R/rubber-hose-cryptanalysis.html: The technique of breaking a code or cipher by finding someone who has the key and applying a rubber hose vigorously and repeatedly to the soles of that luckless person's feet until the key is discovered. Shorthand for any method of coercion: the originator of the term drily noted that it ?can take a surprisingly short time and is quite computationally inexpensive? relative to other cryptanalysis methods. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBETu3hctESbvQ8ZwRAlYhAJ93BIfEAV6zHnYySqF3N82hv5tHrgCdGRCJ rPYUP2kmQ+dlazHN84Ma9SU= =SdpP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] start-freenet.sh patch to disable NPTL on SuSE Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nomen Nescio wrote: On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Toad wrote: Will be committed to unstable soon. That might not be such a good idea, it'll blow up Gentoo: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45004 I run into the problem. However NPTL doesn't seem to be causing me any problems, I don;t know how to to check to see if the same thing is happening here. Freenet merrily chugs along -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBA0aahctESbvQ8ZwRAuXDAKCIVECRiAnYs00FVYb9Dawr7bc95gCeJxlC 8Uq6B+Zxi+O+TsuucA6TVq0= =7c2Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] RNFs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated. Toad wrote: No, it's 200. It used to be 512. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Back up you old configuration file, (optionally, but recommended also delete the original) and use java -jar freenet.jar --config to regenerate it. It'll generate a new config file with all the defaults (be sure to chose the the same listenPort and datastore size as before). (If you have customer settings in you old freenet.conf file that aren't the default, you'll need to re-add them) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFA27znhctESbvQ8ZwRAoYbAJ43mxON7NCbH3WapM91k4QVrbuCnQCfSkiS u7PDlyB4kut58Ty2/H69bV4= =XCHq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] SYNs and SMURFs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Hayter wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the offending IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses was fixed being that it was defined in the .conf file. Excuse my display of ignorance, but could someone please explain why the far ends port would need to change? Example Time: 05/31/2004, 04:21:52 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 1905 Time: 05/31/2004, 04:25:38 Message: Smurf Source: 133.205.255.225, 2600 Etc. Most likely this is an attempt by a Freenet node on 133.205.255.225 to connect to your Freenet external port, which is fixed, but is being prevented by your firewall. It tries again and chooses the next available source port. It has to use a new source port so it can tell the difference between the present connection and previous ones, should a packet return. The return packet will be from your Freenet fixed port, and to the arbitrary source port on the remote machine, 133.205.255.225. This is normal. Can you tell your firewall to ignore connections to your Freenet port? I think it may well be identifying Freenet packets as smurf attacks - what does anyone else think? If this is from a SOHO broadband router - especially a D-Link router, they should likely be disregarded, as the DoS detection in there doesn't usually work and it KNOWN to be broken in D-Link's firmware. There was a version of Freenet, 5023 IIRC, that accidently DID launch a sort of syn flood as it would try to reconnect relentlessly. In general, most SOHO router simply cannot handle the kind of traffic Freenet generates, and it confuses it with a DoS attack. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAu7YxhctESbvQ8ZwRAlhbAJ9Xn5orQIPwNhtdaONP5Ha7vHuNnACfSODp 2eiFYi1hJm8YNcVQSuVA+5o= =okvI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 vinyl1 wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied: For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately (and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the browser or a FCP app) is no good idea IMHO. Maybe so. But maybe the problem is more fundamental. I suspect this is the case. The RNF is coming back much too quickly for the network to have been searched to the limit, unless everyone running FN has miraculously converted to a T3. As an experiment, I cut and pasted some not-found keys into FUQID. Its log file says that it is trying 25 HTL, 30 HTL, and 35 HTL, and not finding anything, but it seems to be working much too quickly. I'm a Win2K transient node on dialup. -vinyl1 The HTL in Freenet is currently capped at 10, so if you inserts anything higher, it'll automatically be cut down to 10. The failure table on your node will then see this request failed at HTL=10 and so will immediately return a DNF. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAn/L2hctESbvQ8ZwRAiC0AKCRB0zFQL1dhlbWC8KNxe6eGs2KlwCfdolN if3KdmO+fYbgKNDS4dbSiLM= =/Qr4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Newbie help WinXP cannot access http://127.0.0.1:8888/
g_12345 wrote: I guess you would need a Beagle to sniff martians :) I've got plenty of b(e)agles One is enclosed in the following password-protected ZIP file Password is 81005 ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet
Nicholas Sturm wrote: Please provide reference to a good glossary. I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an untrusted anonymous source) and it seems to work pretty nicely. Is sandbox just Linux term or does it have broader application? A sandbox is a area of limited functionality where one can control a programs behavior. Think of it more like a jail. Java applets (web applets, not Freenet) run a in sandbox. This way, if the program is malicious (or badly written), it can't do any damage outside the sandbox (in theory, anyway). If a Java applet tries to do something not allowed by the security policy (write a file, open a network connection, change the security policy, etc), Java will raise an exception. Note the ActiveX controls do NOT run in a sandbox. For Linux, there was a project, Subterfugue, which could create a sandbox for a program, but its not currently maintained. There is also User-mode Linux (UML), which lets you run Linux in Linux - everything run the the UML environment is trapped and can't do any damage outside its environment. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Beginner... all I getisWaitingfor127.0.0.1... ... second follow-up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Art Charbonneau wrote: | I've made the 'localhost' change, but see no difference when trying to | use Freenet. Over the past couple days I can link to YoYo, the Help | Index, and Content of Evil, but I cannot get past the 'front page' of | the Freedom Engine. I consistently get a 'data not found' error message. | It seems strange to me that as my request propagates out through the | default node refs, that none of nodes would know where the Freedom | Engine list page would be. | Its not just you, I've been running Freenet for months on a permanent node, and I'm getting the same thing lately. Either is not being inserted, inserts are broken, or routing is broken (or most likely, all 3 ! ). (Using unstable 6338 here, BTW) Its being tweaked, so well see what happened next version :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/uSRQhctESbvQ8ZwRAoHWAJ4jRUG+Tli8fbu4vA3XwUuv6Hz2VwCgg8Qz Eo3YGLYu24v02vYiW2SM3YM= =xXDI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] [Dharmadoer7@aol.com: (no subject)]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Roger Hayter wrote: | Something along the lines of: for win9x use close program dialog | reached by CTRL-ALT-DELETE; for win2k, XP use task manager (reached | unexpectedly or by right clicking on the grey bit at the bottom of the | screen). Kill/close/stop anything with java or freenet in the name. | I am assuming nothing important is likely to be using Java. Then try | again with uninstalling. Manual un-installation will have to await | someone who knows something about the Windows installation, but I don't | think it used to put anything in the registry, which makes it fairly easy. | | Oh, and reboot often, but make sure there is nothing in the StartUp | folder that is going to restart Freenet when you reboot. | | Or you can always uninstall Freenet in Safe Mode if all else fails. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/sXHshctESbvQ8ZwRAjxKAJ0Z+7+gn+GBzmoe8k8An5kVDnayRwCfb2Gb hLWb/vuaD5LhB+8sPDIOrJ4= =NiIh -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
