[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. And for those who have some slight knowledge and do want to run / keep
the
latest Java with a Windows install they can follow the instructions at:
http://wikiserver.freenethelp.org:14741/InstallingFreenet
That's entertaining. ...
Glad you were
1. Newsbyte: keep stirring things up. I find it helpful.
2. With respect I don't think you can both a) claim to be installing like a
novice user and b) insist on keeping your existing Java install to be used and
recognised. IMO the average novice user will choose the full install with Java
and
Oct 28, 2004 9:46:38 PM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading thread,
ERROR): Removing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
id=4348be1270612083, expiresAt=1098953188062 (-10219 ms),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @null @ 4348be1270612083,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@4348be1270612083,true@
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you have CPU overload (persistent 100% CPU usage) at the time?
That's the most likely explanation...
Yup, I discovered that after posting. Someone had started a game, and left it
running...
Sorry for bothering you.
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you show the full stack trace for the NPE in another mail?
Short answer no.
Long answer: I'm guessing a full stack trace shows up in the freenet.log
file, rather than the potted summary from the Recent log entries through the
web interface. I'm guessing that
20:18:47Got a TWCM that was not finished!:
freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:false for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ d4cf7f176cb38016:
d4cf7f176cb38016/4926c6d20ff8833c: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
id=12634, written=258612, closed=true, writingPacket=true, ready=false,
Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, it seems to have started getting better now.. I haven't seen any
of those messages for a while in the log.
No better for me. Last one in the log was less than 2 hours ago.
9:01:13 AM (freenet.MuxConnectionHandler, Network writing thread,
Running 5098 on Windows XP SP2 768 Mb RAM
More information available on request. The node is non-responsive. From Recent
Logs
19:47:04jobDone(160,true) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] but
sendingPacket == null! -
19:48:52resetting -
19:48:52jobDone(160,true) on [EMAIL
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Argh. As usual it doesn't happen for me, so I can't fix it :
OK I'm now half way through Java - an introduction (although I ahd to return it
to the library today), and I got Hello World to compile and run, so just tell me
what I can do to help.
I think my
07:11:19Delete failed on bucket t3fc3294c -
07:11:33Delete failed on bucket t79711c65 -
07:11:33Delete failed on bucket t61e9b552 -
07:12:53Delete failed on bucket t6e6751c8 -
07:13:01
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:freenet:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
07:39:51Got a TWCM that was not finished!:
freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:false for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 3e7b78f261d6d1b4:
3e7b78f261d6d1b4/1cf7832e75b60ba1: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
id=28005, written=353556, closed=true, writingPacket=true, ready=false,
15:34:21State does not receive: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DataInsert
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ da5f10cb49eaa14e:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply.receivedMessage(freenet.node.Node,
freenet.message.DataInsert)
___
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. We have recently been running a number of simulations of Freenet, to
try to:
a) Show that it can work.
b) Show that NGR can work.
c) Find out what HTLs will be required.
d) Find out if different options (e.g. probabilistic caching, estimator
smoothing)
Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Niklas schrieb:
Can you put them on a web server or so? I would like to see what kind of
error that caused the index file corruption.
/N
I disabled the index some months ago, because it got corrupt whenever I
killed the java process while it
On checking the environment I see my data store was wiped. Down from 11+ Gb when
I lasted check to less than 700 Mb.
I haven't looked at the logs because I don't know if anyone cares, and I
wouldn't know what to look for. But I'd be happy to do so if anyone has an
interest in this and wants to
Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On checking the environment I see my data store was wiped.
Down from 11+ Gb when
I lasted check to less than 700 Mb.
Sorry to follow up my own message.
The data would still seem to be in the folders:
13.9 GB (14,976,513,449 bytes) as the size
Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shut down the node, delete the 'index' file from the store-folder then
restart the node. Please let us know if this worked for you? (and please
make a copy of the logs so we can inspect them later on)
That worked, thank you. My 15 Gb (it had been some days
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any chance of doing some doIndex=true vs doIndex=false benchmarks on
different platforms? Can we just set it to false by default?
I'm happy to volunteer Windows XP SP2 if that is of any help. Always happy to
help.
jer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OS: Linux 2.6 (Slackware 10)
Java: SUN 1.4.2_04
freenet-ver: 5092
Network: NAT translated.
I've just set up a new freenet instance ( after a HD krash of my old, no
backup...) but now when it's running it fills up my log with the messages below
and no data is
Don Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's good to know. Thanks. In the event log, does the message say
TCP/IP has reached the security limit imposed on the number of
concurrent TCP connect attempts.? Cuz if so, that's the 10 half-open
connection thing I mentioned in an earlier post. So
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:11:40PM -0400, Don Gregory wrote:
Anybody else here have any trouble with Freenet running on XP SP2? I
know SP2 is still a bit new to most people, and it's a HUGE
service pack, weighing in at over 260M, and it screws with hundreds of
system files, so
vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Every time we download a new release,
we hope this will be the one and all the content will zip to our machines with
lightening speed.
Ok, forgive me if this has been discussed before (and please point me to this
discussion), but I've been wondering what are
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stable build 5086 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
I've still been getting 5085 for the last 3 hours using the update option on the
start menu under Windows.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:00:16AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
fproxy will timeout and then I have to start again. And then it won't even
grab the parts it previously downloaded successfully So over a period of
weeks my perception is that I eventually move
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work
at all
on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression
that you expect Freenet to require
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits
connection
(based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity).
You would want to adjust
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
control. It works very well for those of us
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple
days after that I increased the
Weiliang Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is that any place that shows the current data store size in the web
interface?
Internals*Environment Data Store section
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/internal/env
Data Store
Submitted in the hope it may be of some help/interest. Please advise if you
require more information:
11/06/2004 09:33:55 (freenet.transport.tcpConnection, Finalizer, NORMAL):
finalized without being closed!tcp/connection:
213.156.52.103:1892local,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/06/2004 09:34:01
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What build of Freenet? How much memory in the machine? Did you try to
reduce the memory limit? Are you running on Windows? If you are running
on *nix, please send your start-freenet.sh .. if you are running on
Windows, there's an equivalent issue with direct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds
successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount.
...
So is there anything I can do to reduce the load?
Forgive me if this is too obvious, but I had the same problem
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I enabled an average[input|output]bandwidthlimit of 500. In 5 hours
I've transferred 400MiB of data, which is still far too high,
considering that I should be transferring 288MiB each way per day
(which is also too high).
The average is
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node
needs to know how much bandwidth is available to estimate how much is
being used and therefore how many queries to allow
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What would be nice (in lieu of being able to prefer certain IP ranges - I
get local traffic far cheaper) would be a way to limit monthly transfer,
eg set it so the node can use 5GB/month, and it'll aim for a daily
transfer of about 170MB, but will
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files
not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
through. I'm more interested in the information, not movies, but I
can't think of a tidy way to implement
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Perhaps. That would also lead to high message send times though. Freenet
needs to know what the limit is even if you use external limiting.
Fair enough. But given shared bandwidth needs shouldn't
TLD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is message send time a problem? I mean, AFAIK freenet is able to recognize
links with higher latency and use them as little as possible, thus reducing
the outbound traffic over those links in favour of local
(=not-so-limited) nodes.
I think message send time IS
Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just tested and https://freenet.mixmaster.it:4433/servlet/nodeinfo/
is working
https://freenet.thing.net/
usually works - doesn't seem to be responding at the moment but worth trying
again later.
It was back up again last time I checked
Francis GUDIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dans gmane.network.freenet.support, vous avez crit:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are there any currently working Freenet gateways anywhere? I'm
experimenting some and would like to be able to attempt retrieving my test
Title: Message
Nodeconfig.exe
crashes under Windows...I think this started with 5074 and is definitely present
in 5075.
NodeConfig MFC Application has encountered a problem and needs to close. We
are sorry for the inconvenience.
It always truncates
my Freenet.ini at the same place so the
Greetings. This morning I found a message Routing Table corrupt. Remote RT files and
restart.
I'm new - onyl been up 36 hours. I don't know where the RT files are or how to remove
them.
I've downloaded and installed 5.0.1 choosing to keep my settings. That didn't help.
I'd appreciate some
42 matches
Mail list logo
