[freenet-support] 0.7 Censorship attack

2006-09-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:50, nobody at geonosis.homelinux.net wrote: > This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith > Project Geonosis mixminion server at geonosis.winstonsmith.info. If > you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox- > admin

Re: [freenet-support] 0.7 Censorship attack

2006-09-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
On Saturday 23 September 2006 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith Project Geonosis mixminion server at geonosis.winstonsmith.info. If you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox- [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-25 Thread an ominous cow herd
ay in future (after we are > out of 0.7 alpha) test changes on the testnet, but right now we develop > stuff in SVN, get people to test it from the testing-latest jar, and > then commit a version bump and deploy the new jar generally. > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:06:51PM -0700

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-25 Thread an ominous cow herd
we are out of 0.7 alpha) test changes on the testnet, but right now we develop stuff in SVN, get people to test it from the testing-latest jar, and then commit a version bump and deploy the new jar generally. On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:06:51PM -0700, an ominous cow herd wrote: Thank you

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
Mine fluctuates between 100 and 200 active connections with 800 known nodes. I have seen people bragging about having several hundred active connections and thousands of known nodes. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:19, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: > My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
me who would like to try the 0.7 network, but will not if there is no open net. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 00:34, Ian Clarke wrote: > On 22 Aug 2006, at 20:37, an ominous cow herd wrote: > > You never experienced World War I, but I bet you know something > > about it. > >

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
Mine fluctuates between 100 and 200 active connections with 800 known nodes. I have seen people bragging about having several hundred active connections and thousands of known nodes. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-22 Thread an ominous cow herd
You never experienced World War I, but I bet you know something about it. I don't need to experience Freenet 0.7 to know what I'm talking about. I've said several times that in the past Freenet had two branches, the stable and unstable. The unstable branch was the one where active coding was

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-22 Thread an ominous cow herd
You never experienced World War I, but I bet you know something about it. I don't need to experience Freenet 0.7 to know what I'm talking about. I've said several times that in the past Freenet had two branches, the stable and unstable. The unstable branch was the one where active coding was

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
lpha stage? On Monday 21 August 2006 14:35, Matthew Toseland wrote: > We don't have a big enough team to actively support both. > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:31:38PM -0700, an ominous cow herd wrote: > > I can empathize. Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen > > take

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
Progress can be done in ways that will minimize the pain of progression. In the past, Freenet had stable and unstable branches. New users were directed to the stable branch while developers and the adventurous users used the unstable branch. This worked well in the past. What I don't

[freenet-support] It just isn't easy

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
You might want to try out the more stable Freenet 0.5 version. There are more users and much more content than the alpha 0.7 version. On Wednesday 16 August 2006 06:33, diddler4u at hotmail.com wrote: > I was going to dedicate a PC and it's resources to Freenet. I installed the > application

[freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
I can empathize. Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an alpha version. The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as the stable version instead of the "unsupported" version, and 0.7 as

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
I can empathize. Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an alpha version. The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as the stable version instead of the unsupported version, and 0.7 as

Re: [freenet-support] It just isn't easy

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
You might want to try out the more stable Freenet 0.5 version. There are more users and much more content than the alpha 0.7 version. On Wednesday 16 August 2006 06:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was going to dedicate a PC and it's resources to Freenet. I installed the application but don't

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
with the method of version release that they have used in the past? I hope that the Freenet project will reconsider their decision to direct new users to the unstable alpha 0.7 version instead of the stable 0.5 version. On Monday 21 August 2006 00:01, Julien Cornuwel wrote: an ominous cow herd a écrit

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
Progress can be done in ways that will minimize the pain of progression. In the past, Freenet had stable and unstable branches. New users were directed to the stable branch while developers and the adventurous users used the unstable branch. This worked well in the past. What I don't

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread an ominous cow herd
21 August 2006 14:35, Matthew Toseland wrote: We don't have a big enough team to actively support both. On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:31:38PM -0700, an ominous cow herd wrote: I can empathize. Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take a working application and push it aside