Re: [freenet-support] How to force freenet to use a non-default java

2010-09-07 Thread urza9814
If you're running the jar directly, you could just hardcode the path to Java in front of it. i.e. instead of typing 'java -jar freenet.jar' you could type something like '~/bin/java -jar freenet.jar'...and you could put that into a shell script or some kind of shortcut to make it easier. If you're

Re: [freenet-support] Why does my system go so slow when I run freenet on its own computer paral

2010-07-25 Thread urza9814
Not sure why adding the router would change it(I'm not sure exactly what you setup is/was,) but I would add an input bandwidth limit. Note that the freenet limit uses bytes, while your speed is measured in bits. So your speed, 450kbps, is 56KB/s. I'd set the input limit to 20. Even if all

Re: [freenet-support] philosophical question

2009-12-17 Thread urza9814
It could be done, and pretty easily too I believe. However, the problem is that it would need to be done through some kind of 'bridge' website, and whoever ran the server for such a site would have some serious legal problems. I mean, if people just hosting .torrent files can be successfully

Re: [freenet-support] Support Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9

2009-11-10 Thread urza9814
Freenet is exactly what was being discussed. He wasn't looking for support for illegal activities, he was looking for support for Freenet, which he happened to be using in a way that in certain countries is illegal. So should we refuse support to anyone asking for help with freenet if their use of

Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-09 Thread urza9814
...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean you can't talk about it. We (supposedly) have freedom of speech here in the US - I mean, murder is illegal, but you can still _talk_ about murder. Hell you can even

Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-09 Thread urza9814
Meh, it's no different from what television and movie producers do on a daily basis... On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, VolodyA! V Anarhist volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote: urza9...@gmail.com пишет: ...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed illegal? Just

Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-07 Thread urza9814
Wow, that's a bit...extreme. I mean there's a _huge_ difference between refusing to give someone support, which may or may not be legal, and completely banning them. I mean just because _you_ can't help him doesn't mean nobody else on this list can. Way to alienate a rather significant percentage

Re: [freenet-support] Piracy will not be tolerated

2009-11-07 Thread urza9814
Hah, I don't really need a welcome, I've been here my whole life :) And he wasn't using the email list to discuss illegal activities, he was using the email list to get support for Freenet - exactly what it is here for. On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Mike Cook mikec...@pipeline.com wrote:

Re: [freenet-support] problems with internet

2009-10-11 Thread urza9814
I've had that problem before actually, though it was on Freenet 0.5. Is there still a way to set bandwidth limits? That's what I had to do. Freenet saturated the network so heavily that while it was running _nothing_ else would work. On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com

Re: [freenet-support] elettra, a supplementary way to encrypt files on your harddisk

2009-10-08 Thread urza9814
It could be quite useful to encrypt downloads though, and/or Freenet itself... On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Artefact2 artefa...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:26 PM, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote: Elettra might be supplementary to freenet users, a supplementary way to encrypt

Re: [freenet-support] Darknet Question .... and some other fundamental Qs

2008-08-03 Thread urza9814
Well, the entire point of Freenet is that nobody can know where the data originated. So if you're asking if there's a way to only get data inserted by nodes you're friends with - no. That would defeat the purpose of Freenet. If you're asking if you can only get data that is stored on your friends'

Re: [freenet-support] does freenet slow down the computer

2007-11-02 Thread urza9814
There should be bandwidth limits somewhere in the config file. I'm using 0.5myself, I'm guessing you're on 0.7, but look around in freenet.conf or whatever configuration files you can find for some kind of input and output bandwidth limits. I suggest running a speed test on your connection (just

Re: [freenet-support] Newbie Reply

2007-05-01 Thread urza9814
well, unless something's changed in the newer versions (I still use 0.5 for various reasons), that means freenet isn't running. I'm assuming you are running windows, so make sure the little freenet icon appears in the system tray, and if so, right click and there should be an option to view the

Re: [freenet-support] Newbie

2007-04-30 Thread urza9814
You would search for files by either finding them on websites (check http://localhost: if you haven't already) or using the search feature of frost. On 4/30/07, Brent Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I was wondering how to set this up and actually what it was. I was thinking of using fuqid

Re: [freenet-support] unrecognized command: Java -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize

2007-04-26 Thread urza9814
That's not working. One other thing I had to change in the script was add an 'LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.6.17'...I just threw that in after all the if loops that set that...but whenever I try running it now it just gives me this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]# sh start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar

Re: [freenet-support] libc.so.6

2007-01-04 Thread urza9814
Hmm. I commented them out, and now it APPEARS to run fine, but it doesn't. On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: try to remove/comment out the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL thingy in the start scripts. I use a 2.6.18.2-kernel, both freenet versions (5 and 7) runs proper without this und

[freenet-support] libc.so.6

2007-01-03 Thread urza9814
So I had this exact same problem before, and I fixed it by using a different linux distro (switch from slackware back to Mandriva 2006). But now I'm on the distro that worked a year later (Mandriva 2007) and it's no longer working. But I'm a bit smarter now, so I'm hoping I can get it figured out.

Re: [freenet-support] HELP!!!!!

2006-12-19 Thread urza9814
You are far from the first person to have a problem with getting node refs for Freenet 0.7. I'm gonna say what I tell everyone else: Don't use 0.7. It's pretty much experimental. There's a good reason a large number of us are holding on to 0.5, a big one for me being that it's a true opennet

Re: [freenet-support] HELP!!!!!

2006-12-19 Thread urza9814
All the download links on that page are 0.5. If you're on windows hit the 'freenet-java-webinstall.exe' link, if on linux/unix use the 'freenet-stable-latest.tgz' On 12/19/06, damian alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm , went to that link didnt see a download for 0.5,??? From:

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet (0.5, Build 5106) has trouble with time transitions

2006-10-29 Thread urza9814
Mine didn't. I'm running 0.5 on Linux. When I ran 0.5 on WinXP, it hit 100% CPU usage half an hour after I started it anyways Mebbe it's a problem in 0.7? On 10/29/06, Mr. Flibble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by alarms

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Welcome to the Support mailing list

2006-10-28 Thread urza9814
You need to connect to irc.freenode.net with an IRC client, not your web browser. Try mirc, which is available here: http://www.mirc.com/get.html You could also (and I highly recommend this approach) try downloading Freenet 0.5 instead, which does not require you to manually gather node

Re: [freenet-support] UNINSTALLER

2006-09-07 Thread urza9814
You do realize that on Limewire ANYONE can see what you search, what you download, and who you are, right? Limewire makes you create a username and gives out your IP address. I have found people's exact street address with just a username and IP. It's not that hard. Freenet, on the other hand,

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-09-01 Thread urza9814
Meh...depends where you're at. It's not one giant firewallit's a regional thing. Beijing must just have high security. Seems odd that they'd block out SSHbut I suppose SSH is a good way to hide what you're doing. On 9/1/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006

Re: [freenet-chat] Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7

2006-08-30 Thread urza9814
Have you thought about that ignoring reset packets thing that was shown to make it possible to bypass The Great Firewall? I mean, I don't know too much about it, or if it'd be possible for freenetbut it might be worth looking in to. Also just wanna add that I fully support the desire to help

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-27 Thread urza9814
I got nothing. No 'icon', no tags to place an icon, nothing. On 8/27/06, Nicholas Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I opened the message below all that displayed was an icon. When I attempted to save the icon all hell broke loose. My mail client was closed. After some attempts I was able

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-27 Thread urza9814
Exactly. The theory of a darknet is you connect to people that you already know and trust. Now, there's a good chance of getting a worldwide-net because someone in group A may know and trust someone in group B, but chances are that not all of group A knows all of group B. For a real-world

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-26 Thread urza9814
Through the opennet. Which won't exist for, like, a year. Hmmm. On 8/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main network. There might be now,

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-24 Thread urza9814
Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is setup is to allow small groups to connect without connecting to everyone else. Pretty

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-24 Thread urza9814
As I see it 0.7 relies on a bunch of people hooking up by sharing node information. I may be a part of a freenet 0.7 network that consists of less than 20 people. Out there somewhere else is another group of people, but that group might be 100 people. Unless someone in the 2 groups makes a

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-24 Thread urza9814
True, but the opennet isn't illegal. I'm not in any way saying the darknet shouldn't be added...it's a great feature...but freenet has always been an opennet, and that should be done first. People who want a darknet are probably already using other programs like Waste. If they start thinking

Re: Migration path, please! (Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0, 5 and 0, 7

2006-08-24 Thread urza9814
opennets are only bad in certain circumstances. The USA is not yet one of them. With a darknet, it may be harder to get into the network, but once your in it's a LOT easier to identify who is sharing and inserting what files. So it could be argued that a darknet is much riskier than an opennet.

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9814
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and probably more users, though I'm not sure on that one. On 8/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9814
My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50 connections right now and I'm not doing anything. Not running frost, not surving any sites...all inbound I guess. On 8/23/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100. On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9814
0.7 isn't a stable version either. It's a not nearly completed, far from functional version. On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 0.5 isn't a stable version. It's an outdated version that many people happen to use. Of course you can keep using 0.5 and slowly watch it die, or even

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9814
It has no opennet. As far as I'm concerned, it's useless. On 8/23/06, Ortwin Regel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wrong, it works quite well so it's functional. It's not completed but it needs users to progress. On 8/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 0.7 isn't a stable version

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread urza9814
.7 has very few users, very little content, and no opennet. It's useless for new users. And the security that you say is better has yet to be tested. I wouldn't bet on something that's only been around for a few months vs. something that's been slowly improving for...well, longer than I've known

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7

2006-08-21 Thread urza9814
Anyway, I won't argue on that because the decision is not in my hands. The fact is that 0.7 is the only supported version and that it is the future. Not linking to the current version and gripping to the old one would be an interesting kind of suicide for a project that's a constant

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 947

2006-08-16 Thread urza9814
You really ought to get a second mailing list for the 0.7 network. Because I'm pretty sure no one here cares until there's an opennet. On 8/16/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet build 947 is now available. This build simply makes 944 mandatory as of midnight GMT on Monday

[freenet-support] Linux Spiders

2006-07-14 Thread urza9814
Well, after failing to install Freenet on Slackware, I realized, Mandrake was the best (in terms of 'just working') Linux distro I'd ever used up until 10.1 and 2005LE, so I decided to give it another shot. So far so good. Freenet's running nicely too, once I found the missing step in the Java

[freenet-support] libc.so.6

2006-06-19 Thread urza9814
I'm trying to install freenet on slackware, and I must say it's been quite annoying so far...I had everything in a freenet folder in my home directory, but had to copy half the files right into my home directory anyways because it couldn't find them otherwise...but anyways, here's my current

[freenet-support] Connection timeouts

2006-03-03 Thread urza9814
I keep getting connection timeouts, and I think it might be due to the nature of my internet connection, but I'm not sure how to go about fixing that. Basically, what I have is a router connected to two computers, and then this computer is connected through one of those two by a cable connection.