On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 03:20:04AM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > Will be committed to unstable soon.
>
> Having read http://people.redhat.com/drepper/assumekernel.html I think
> we can do away with the distribution check and set LD_ASSUME_KE
Im running gentoo with nptl and I just commented out the whole if
statement and the setting of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL and it works fine here. So
perhaps just not setting it if the user is running gentoo will work for
others.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:35:22AM -0500, Salah Coronya wrote:
> -BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Toad wrote:
>
>>Will be committed to unstable soon.
>
>
That might not be such a good idea, it'll blow up Gentoo:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45004
I run into the problem. Ho
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> Will be committed to unstable soon.
Having read http://people.redhat.com/drepper/assumekernel.html I think
we can do away with the distribution check and set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to
2.4.1 for all Linux distributions. Patch for start-freenet.sh b
Will be committed to unstable soon.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:00:03AM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Since version 9.1 SuSE is using NPTL by default. To tell an application
> not to use NPTL, it is recommended to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.1.
> You'll find a trivial patch to start-freenet.sh attac
Since version 9.1 SuSE is using NPTL by default. To tell an application
not to use NPTL, it is recommended to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.1.
You'll find a trivial patch to start-freenet.sh attached to this mail.
--- start-freenet.sh.bak2004-07-22 22:43:47.0 +0200
+++ start-freenet.s