I've repeatedly seen old machines like my P3-600 disregarded as
irrelevant, and not worth optimizing for, in terms of the Freenet
network.
See above. The best thing I can do for you is get rate limiting working
properly. And I think Freenet should easily run on a 600MHz machine, or
something
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:56:42AM -0600, S wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
Maximilian Mehnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet is one of the most beautiful ideas I ever hit on.
But it should be possible to run it on a small pentium machine with no
more than 100MB of RAM.
I
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:28:27PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
On 29/01/2004, at 10:13 PM, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of
whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:21:13PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
And how many browsers do that? Sure, I'm not sure about writing a
plugin, since most of the time they can only add processing for
different MIME types, whereas a different browser using a freenet://
protocol could connect
On 29/01/2004, at 10:13 PM, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of
whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use? If you set it to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use it
On 31/01/2004, at 12:32 PM, David Masover wrote:
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko
or
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use
Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use? If you set it to use the YThreadFactory, do things
improve?
Sorry.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
Maximilian Mehnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Freenet is one of the most beautiful ideas I ever hit on.
But it should be possible to run it on a small pentium machine with no
more than 100MB of RAM.
I agree 100%. I have a machine dedicated to Freenet. It
Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack.
In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
file set to use? If you set it to use the YThreadFactory, do things
improve?
At the moment it looks ok. I upgraded to 5065 and I'm using
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of S
Sent: den 28 januari 2004 13:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Way to much RAM! Build 5064
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
Maximilian Mehnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
12 matches
Mail list logo
