On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but
slower for download (up=down)...
Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps!
Wrong list
Woah. We have MUCH less bandwidth in the UK. :|
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little
That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but
slower for download (up=down)...
Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps!
Thomas Guyot
Dave wrote:
You want to move to Japan instead. 100Mbits up, 100Mbits down DSL, for
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:34:18AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node
needs to know how much bandwidth is available to
[snip]
1. My experience is that I can get a limit of 5 Gb of *international*
traffic a
month (170 Mb a day) with Node bandwidth limits of
Overall 0
Output 750
Input 0
Yup, a limit of 750 bytes per second. I need to experiment more with
the
Overall setting. Freenet is the single most effective
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What would be nice (in lieu of being able to prefer certain IP ranges - I
get local traffic far cheaper) would be a way to limit monthly transfer,
eg set it so the node can use
Have you tried averageOutputLimit ? Does it work?
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:25:33PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
[snip]
1. My experience is that I can get a limit of 5 Gb of *international*
traffic a
month (170 Mb a day) with Node bandwidth limits of
Overall 0
Output 750
Input 0
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:32:50AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files
not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
through. I'm more interested in the
Toad wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
So I've been working towards a Linux traffic shaper that gives sets no limits
on traffic with domestic IP addresses and limits international traffic so the
total monthly limit hits 5 Gb (my cap).
HOW do you determine
Toad wrote:
2. I really suspect that more serious bandwidth limiting should be done at an
operating system (router) level rather than at the Freenet level. I suspect
that's what you'll be told around here. That way you can also take account of
things happening other than your node. :-)
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:42:28PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Toad wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
So I've been working towards a Linux traffic shaper that gives sets no
limits on traffic with domestic IP addresses and limits international
traffic
On 24/05/2004, at 11:32 PM, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files
not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going
through. I'm more interested in the information, not movies, but
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:25:33PM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
[bigger snip]
Yeah, I'm looking at it, but there's no decent way to detect freenet
packets.
That's a feature :).
Yeah, even on localhost :P IPTABLE's OWNER match target only works in
the OUTPUT chain. I can't monitor something
On 25/05/2004, at 5:27 AM, Toad wrote:
[snip]
2. I really suspect that more serious bandwidth limiting should be
done at an
operating system (router) level rather than at the Freenet level. I
suspect
that's what you'll be told around here. That way you can also take
account of
things happening
14 matches
Mail list logo
