[freenet-support] Default JVM in Windows XP, setting JVM options

2006-02-07 Thread Juiceman
On 2/6/06, Ashton Vaz wrote: > Hello, > > I recently installed Freenet Build 5106 on a Windows XP SP2 machine > via the freenet installer. After doing so, Freenet worked well with one > exception. It is a resource hog - both in terms of memory as well as > processor time. I found this puzzl

[freenet-support] Default JVM in Windows XP, setting JVM options

2006-02-06 Thread Ashton Vaz
Hello, I recently installed Freenet Build 5106 on a Windows XP SP2 machine via the freenet installer. After doing so, Freenet worked well with one exception. It is a resource hog - both in terms of memory as well as processor time. I found this puzzling as all other large Java applicati

Re: [freenet-support] Default JVM in Windows XP, setting JVM options

2006-02-06 Thread Juiceman
On 2/6/06, Ashton Vaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I recently installed Freenet Build 5106 on a Windows XP SP2 machine > via the freenet installer. After doing so, Freenet worked well with one > exception. It is a resource hog - both in terms of memory as well as > processor time.

[freenet-support] Default JVM in Windows XP, setting JVM options

2006-02-06 Thread Ashton Vaz
Hello, I recently installed Freenet Build 5106 on a Windows XP SP2 machine via the freenet installer. After doing so, Freenet worked well with one exception. It is a resource hog - both in terms of memory as well as processor time. I found this puzzling as all other large Java applicati