On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 06:38:13PM +0200, van2 at vipmail.hu wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
> disk access. I have a couple questions related to this:
If constant access wears out your drive then your drive is defective,
take it back to t
Hi,
I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
disk access. I have a couple questions related to this:
1. Is there any support for disk caching that might be able to reduce
disk accesses?
2. Would increasing the memory available to the JVM make freenet read
the d
On 4/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
> disk access.
I don't think disk drives wear out that quickly, and lots of software
writes to the disk constantly. That being said, the default log level
in test
On 4/1/06, van2 at vipmail.hu wrote:
> I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
> disk access.
I don't think disk drives wear out that quickly, and lots of software
writes to the disk constantly. That being said, the default log level
in testnet Freenet is set
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 06:38:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
> disk access. I have a couple questions related to this:
If constant access wears out your drive then your drive is defective,
take it back to th
Hi,
I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant
disk access. I have a couple questions related to this:
1. Is there any support for disk caching that might be able to reduce
disk accesses?
2. Would increasing the memory available to the JVM make freenet read
the
