[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
Mine fluctuates between 100 and 200 active connections with 800 known nodes. I have seen people bragging about having several hundred active connections and thousands of known nodes. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:19, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: > My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really doesn't belong here. Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100. On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:09:59AM -0400, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: > With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. > Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 > connections with the default

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Lars Juel Nielsen
On 8/23/06, urza9814 at gmail.com wrote: > With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. > Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 > connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and > probably more users, though I'm not sure on

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9...@gmail.com
My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50 connections right now and I'm not doing anything. Not running frost, not surving any sites...all inbound I guess. On 8/23/06, Matthew Toseland wrote: > 400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100. > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:09:59AM -0400,

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread diddle...@hotmail.com
I'm new to Freenet and have been watching the discussion about version 0.5 vs 0.7. I'm not sure what is meant when the 0.5 advocates talk about OpenNet, so could someone enlighten me? I went to the Freenet site hoping to find information related to 0.5, even in the WIKI, but it now only

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9...@gmail.com
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and probably more users, though I'm not sure on that one. On 8/23/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread diddler4u
I'm new to Freenet and have been watching the discussion about version 0.5 vs 0.7. I'm not sure what is meant when the 0.5 advocates talk about OpenNet, so could someone enlighten me? I went to the Freenet site hoping to find information related to 0.5, even in the WIKI, but it now only

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9814
With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and probably more users, though I'm not sure on that one. On 8/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Lars Juel Nielsen
On 8/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 connections with the default settings. And 0.5 has more content and probably more users, though I'm not sure

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100. On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:09:59AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With 0.5's opennet you don't have to exchange node references. At all. Your node does it for you. And you'll usually have around 400 connections with the default settings. And

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread urza9814
My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50 connections right now and I'm not doing anything. Not running frost, not surving any sites...all inbound I guess. On 8/23/06, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 400 connections? I hardly ever saw more than 100. On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Please move this conversation to the chat mailing list, it really doesn't belong here.Ian. Ian Clarke: Co-Founder Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog ___ Support mailing list

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.5 or Freenet 0.7

2006-08-23 Thread an ominous cow herd
Mine fluctuates between 100 and 200 active connections with 800 known nodes. I have seen people bragging about having several hundred active connections and thousands of known nodes. On Wednesday 23 August 2006 11:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My bad. 400 known nodes. Though...I have 50