Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Down!

2004-07-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see your point, but we are working in a collaborative environment, and the node ops time is important too. Maybe less that the core developers one, but still important. This is the Stable release, and 5087 is crap^h^h^h^h er... unworkable. ... the user too deserve some attention when

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Down!

2004-07-28 Thread Toad
Umm, it ran out of memory. You can either wait for 5088 or increase the -Xmx setting. On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:32:41PM -0700, miguel wrote: For the first time since I started Freenet some 10 months ago it has failed! Build 5085 was fine. 5086... trash. Downhill. It would not find even YoYo,

[freenet-support] Freenet Down!

2004-07-27 Thread miguel
For the first time since I started Freenet some 10 months ago it has failed! Build 5085 was fine. 5086... trash. Downhill. It would not find even YoYo, plus, it would just disconnect after 4 or 5 hours. This is a first for me since I usually run Freenet for days without a restart. Enter 5087.

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Down!

2004-07-27 Thread Nicholas Sturm
Oh, come now. Does not anyone remember that a version number below 1.00 or a variation there of means developmental. As long as any software is developmental it means failures of a new version is almost certain. Even multi-billion companies can seldom produce software that runs on every