Re: [freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a

[remailer]

-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext

In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical 
 expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might 
 concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.
 
 1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How 
 will I be able to find a set of peers?

You can use the opennet.
 
 2. Does needing to have one's node always on literally require 24 
 hour connection? I can manage a few hours (broadband) most days at 
 best.
 
 3. Will the identifiers of existing Freesites have to change?

SSKs might or might not change. I haven't decided yet.
 
 4. Will new tools for site insertion be required and if so will 
 they be made available at the same time as the new Freenet comes 
 into general use? People like me prefer interfaces such as Freesite 
 Insertion Wizard to command line driven tools.

Yes, new tools will be required. And yes, we will try to ensure they are
available close to release of the new network - we don't want half the
world's media reporting that freenet 0.7 is fast but has no content
except the porn the [favourite bogeyman] inserted! ;)

an 0.7 version of FIW I hope?

 
 Thanks to the team for their splendid work.
 
 Duke Morbid
 
 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/PussyGalore//

Many thanks to our faithful site authors.


A question I've not seen addressed with other than 'soon', approximately when
do you expect 0.7 to be released for public use?


-END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a Freesite author

[Matthew Toseland]

On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, dukemorbid1 at hushmail.com wrote:
> I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical 
> expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might 
> concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.
> 
> 1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How 
> will I be able to find a set of peers?

You can use the opennet.
> 
> 2. Does needing to have one's node "always on" literally require 24 
> hour connection? I can manage a few hours (broadband) most days at 
> best.
> 
> 3. Will the identifiers of existing Freesites have to change?

SSKs might or might not change. I haven't decided yet.
> 
> 4. Will new tools for site insertion be required and if so will 
> they be made available at the same time as the new Freenet comes 
> into general use? People like me prefer interfaces such as Freesite 
> Insertion Wizard to command line driven tools.

Yes, new tools will be required. And yes, we will try to ensure they are
available close to release of the new network - we don't want half the
world's media reporting that freenet 0.7 is fast but has no content
except the porn the [favourite bogeyman] inserted! ;)
> 
> Thanks to the team for their splendid work.
> 
> Duke Morbid
> 
> /SSK at xdDLu9KYaJGEL9543hOrarcoFM8PAgM/PussyGalore//

Many thanks to our faithful site authors.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 

[freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a

[remai...@invalid.com]

-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext

In <20050919160711.GB19713 at amphibian.dyndns.org> Matthew Toseland  wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, dukemorbid1 at hushmail.com wrote:
>> I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical 
>> expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might 
>> concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.
>> 
>> 1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How 
>> will I be able to find a set of peers?
>
>You can use the opennet.
>> 
>> 2. Does needing to have one's node "always on" literally require 24 
>> hour connection? I can manage a few hours (broadband) most days at 
>> best.
>> 
>> 3. Will the identifiers of existing Freesites have to change?
>
>SSKs might or might not change. I haven't decided yet.
>> 
>> 4. Will new tools for site insertion be required and if so will 
>> they be made available at the same time as the new Freenet comes 
>> into general use? People like me prefer interfaces such as Freesite 
>> Insertion Wizard to command line driven tools.
>
>Yes, new tools will be required. And yes, we will try to ensure they are
>available close to release of the new network - we don't want half the
>world's media reporting that freenet 0.7 is fast but has no content
>except the porn the [favourite bogeyman] inserted! ;)

an 0.7 version of FIW I hope?

>> 
>> Thanks to the team for their splendid work.
>> 
>> Duke Morbid
>> 
>> /SSK at xdDLu9KYaJGEL9543hOrarcoFM8PAgM/PussyGalore//
>
>Many thanks to our faithful site authors.


A question I've not seen addressed with other than 'soon', approximately when
do you expect 0.7 to be released for public use?


-END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-

[freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a Freesite author

[dukemorbid1]

I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical 
expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might 
concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.

1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How 
will I be able to find a set of peers?

2. Does needing to have one's node always on literally require 24 
hour connection? I can manage a few hours (broadband) most days at 
best.

3. Will the identifiers of existing Freesites have to change?

4. Will new tools for site insertion be required and if so will 
they be made available at the same time as the new Freenet comes 
into general use? People like me prefer interfaces such as Freesite 
Insertion Wizard to command line driven tools.

Thanks to the team for their splendid work.

Duke Morbid

/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/PussyGalore//






Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2

Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434

Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: 
http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a Freesite author

[Matthew Toseland]

On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 04:47:54AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical 
 expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might 
 concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.
 
 1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How 
 will I be able to find a set of peers?

You can use the opennet.
 
 2. Does needing to have one's node always on literally require 24 
 hour connection? I can manage a few hours (broadband) most days at 
 best.
 
 3. Will the identifiers of existing Freesites have to change?

SSKs might or might not change. I haven't decided yet.
 
 4. Will new tools for site insertion be required and if so will 
 they be made available at the same time as the new Freenet comes 
 into general use? People like me prefer interfaces such as Freesite 
 Insertion Wizard to command line driven tools.

Yes, new tools will be required. And yes, we will try to ensure they are
available close to release of the new network - we don't want half the
world's media reporting that freenet 0.7 is fast but has no content
except the porn the [favourite bogeyman] inserted! ;)
 
 Thanks to the team for their splendid work.
 
 Duke Morbid
 
 /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/PussyGalore//

Many thanks to our faithful site authors.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Proposed new freenet - questions from a Freesite author

[dukemorb...@hushmail.com]

I viewed Ian's DEFCON presentation and though not a technical 
expert found it fascinating. Some questions arise that might 
concern other non-technical users of Freenet too.

1. I don't know (i.e. can't identify) any other Freenet users. How 
will I be able to find a set of peers?

2. Does needing to have one's node "always on" literally require 24 
hour connection? I can manage a few hours (broadband) most days at 
best.

3. Will the identifiers of existing Freesites have to change?

4. Will new tools for site insertion be required and if so will 
they be made available at the same time as the new Freenet comes 
into general use? People like me prefer interfaces such as Freesite 
Insertion Wizard to command line driven tools.

Thanks to the team for their splendid work.

Duke Morbid

/SSK at xdDLu9KYaJGEL9543hOrarcoFM8PAgM/PussyGalore//






Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2

Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434

Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: 
http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427