[freenet-support] Re: outputBandwidthLimit
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Bob wrote: > Roman Bednarek writes: > >> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >>> It *should* work. It is believed to work. Do you have an >>> inputBandwidthLimit set? That might be helpful - incoming traffic >>> requires acknowledgement via outgoing packets. >>> >> No, I do not have inputBandwidthLimit set (my ADSL has much bigger >> input than output), but now when I set it nothing has changed. I run it on >> linux, if it doeas matter. On servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general page I >> can read: >> Current upstream bandwidth usage 208 bytes/second (5,1%) >> and at the same time about 18KB on iptraf monitor(with only freenet >> running). >> I had to stop freenet node, to write that answer in pine, full >> bandwidth was used and I even could not type. (not always is so bad, most >> of the time something free is left). >> >> Roman > > Hmm, well that's odd. Output limiting is not accurate, and there can be a lag > of > up to 10 minutes before fred notices changes to the conf file, but it seems to > basically work in my experience. Some disparity between fred's usage report > and > iptraf's could be explained by instantaneous vs. long period sampling, but > can't > explain a limit of 4k apparently maxing out your upstream. > > Could you post your outputBandwdithLimit line exactly as it appears in > freenet.conf / freenet.ini, and maybe the immediately surrounding entries? I > suspect it's not doing anything at all because it's somehow malformed, thus > letting freenet run unlimited. > > Bob > The config option is specified correctly, I see that it is changing bandwidth usage. Through trial and error and discovered that setting limit to 2KB is acceptable for my upload bandwidth, it takes about 10-15KB. In report "Current upstream bandwidth usage" is now a little bigger, around specified 2KB, it is not the same what iptraf shows, but is better than previous 0.2 KB. So, the limit is not exact, but is working, and I was able to tune it to my needs. Long time ago, before Asynchronyous IO limiting was accurate, probably limiting with nio is not always working as expected. Roman
Re: [freenet-support] Re: outputBandwidthLimit
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Bob wrote: Roman Bednarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Matthew Toseland wrote: It *should* work. It is believed to work. Do you have an inputBandwidthLimit set? That might be helpful - incoming traffic requires acknowledgement via outgoing packets. No, I do not have inputBandwidthLimit set (my ADSL has much bigger input than output), but now when I set it nothing has changed. I run it on linux, if it doeas matter. On servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general page I can read: Current upstream bandwidth usage 208 bytes/second (5,1%) and at the same time about 18KB on iptraf monitor(with only freenet running). I had to stop freenet node, to write that answer in pine, full bandwidth was used and I even could not type. (not always is so bad, most of the time something free is left). Roman Hmm, well that's odd. Output limiting is not accurate, and there can be a lag of up to 10 minutes before fred notices changes to the conf file, but it seems to basically work in my experience. Some disparity between fred's usage report and iptraf's could be explained by instantaneous vs. long period sampling, but can't explain a limit of 4k apparently maxing out your upstream. Could you post your outputBandwdithLimit line exactly as it appears in freenet.conf / freenet.ini, and maybe the immediately surrounding entries? I suspect it's not doing anything at all because it's somehow malformed, thus letting freenet run unlimited. Bob The config option is specified correctly, I see that it is changing bandwidth usage. Through trial and error and discovered that setting limit to 2KB is acceptable for my upload bandwidth, it takes about 10-15KB. In report Current upstream bandwidth usage is now a little bigger, around specified 2KB, it is not the same what iptraf shows, but is better than previous 0.2 KB. So, the limit is not exact, but is working, and I was able to tune it to my needs. Long time ago, before Asynchronyous IO limiting was accurate, probably limiting with nio is not always working as expected. Roman ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: outputBandwidthLimit
Still doesn't make sense to me. If you switch the node off completely, what's the bandwidth usage? On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:39:20AM +0100, Roman Bednarek wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Bob wrote: Roman Bednarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Matthew Toseland wrote: It *should* work. It is believed to work. Do you have an inputBandwidthLimit set? That might be helpful - incoming traffic requires acknowledgement via outgoing packets. No, I do not have inputBandwidthLimit set (my ADSL has much bigger input than output), but now when I set it nothing has changed. I run it on linux, if it doeas matter. On servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general page I can read: Current upstream bandwidth usage 208 bytes/second (5,1%) and at the same time about 18KB on iptraf monitor(with only freenet running). I had to stop freenet node, to write that answer in pine, full bandwidth was used and I even could not type. (not always is so bad, most of the time something free is left). Roman Hmm, well that's odd. Output limiting is not accurate, and there can be a lag of up to 10 minutes before fred notices changes to the conf file, but it seems to basically work in my experience. Some disparity between fred's usage report and iptraf's could be explained by instantaneous vs. long period sampling, but can't explain a limit of 4k apparently maxing out your upstream. Could you post your outputBandwdithLimit line exactly as it appears in freenet.conf / freenet.ini, and maybe the immediately surrounding entries? I suspect it's not doing anything at all because it's somehow malformed, thus letting freenet run unlimited. Bob The config option is specified correctly, I see that it is changing bandwidth usage. Through trial and error and discovered that setting limit to 2KB is acceptable for my upload bandwidth, it takes about 10-15KB. In report Current upstream bandwidth usage is now a little bigger, around specified 2KB, it is not the same what iptraf shows, but is better than previous 0.2 KB. So, the limit is not exact, but is working, and I was able to tune it to my needs. Long time ago, before Asynchronyous IO limiting was accurate, probably limiting with nio is not always working as expected. Roman ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: outputBandwidthLimit
Roman Bednarek writes: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > It *should* work. It is believed to work. Do you have an > > inputBandwidthLimit set? That might be helpful - incoming traffic > > requires acknowledgement via outgoing packets. > > > No, I do not have inputBandwidthLimit set (my ADSL has much bigger > input than output), but now when I set it nothing has changed. I run it on > linux, if it doeas matter. On servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general page I > can read: > Current upstream bandwidth usage 208 bytes/second (5,1%) > and at the same time about 18KB on iptraf monitor(with only freenet > running). > I had to stop freenet node, to write that answer in pine, full > bandwidth was used and I even could not type. (not always is so bad, most > of the time something free is left). > > Roman Hmm, well that's odd. Output limiting is not accurate, and there can be a lag of up to 10 minutes before fred notices changes to the conf file, but it seems to basically work in my experience. Some disparity between fred's usage report and iptraf's could be explained by instantaneous vs. long period sampling, but can't explain a limit of 4k apparently maxing out your upstream. Could you post your outputBandwdithLimit line exactly as it appears in freenet.conf / freenet.ini, and maybe the immediately surrounding entries? I suspect it's not doing anything at all because it's somehow malformed, thus letting freenet run unlimited. Bob
[freenet-support] Re: outputBandwidthLimit
If you run Windows, just use "netlimiter" (freeware). Under Linux, you have to use the tc-commands (search for "traffic shaping"). Hope I could help! Fred __ Erweitern Sie FreeMail zu einem noch leistungsstarkeren E-Mail-Postfach! Mehr Infos unter http://freemail.web.de/home/landingpad/?mc=021131
[freenet-support] Re: outputBandwidthLimit
If you run Windows, just use netlimiter (freeware). Under Linux, you have to use the tc-commands (search for traffic shaping). Hope I could help! Fred __ Erweitern Sie FreeMail zu einem noch leistungsstarkeren E-Mail-Postfach! Mehr Infos unter http://freemail.web.de/home/landingpad/?mc=021131 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
