:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] datastore size
* Replies will be sent through Spamex to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* For additional info click - http://www.spamex.com/i/?v=3880664
Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably
On 14 Aug 2004 at 1:06, Paul Schauble wrote:
There should be a relationship between bandwidth and store size. At a guess,
it's exponential, doubling the bandwidth can support a store 4 times larger.
That's quadratic, not exponential. The store size would be scaling
with the square of the
Debatable point...
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves routing. If
I were you I would let it specialise at one
Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
each node?
My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
in a timely manner due to resource limits (probably bandwidth).
As the
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 01:06 schrieb Derek Ferguson:
Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
each node?
Sorry, yes.
My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
