Re: [freenet-support] getting bigger - time to raise defaults

2002-11-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:03:27PM -0500, Zlatin Balevsky wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | high if it's a big freesite. The correct response is to implement | mixmastered first two hops, which we will not implement before 1.0. This is all nice and good, but please

Re: [freenet-support] getting bigger - time to raise defaults?

2002-11-05 Thread Tld
Zlatin Balevsky wrote: The network is getting bigger and bigger. Most of my requests DNF with htl 15 but are retrieved with 25. Maybe its time to up the defaults a bit. There is a bigger problems with actual implementation of HTLs: unless a node operator explicitly asks otherwise, all

Re: [freenet-support] getting bigger - time to raise defaults?

2002-11-05 Thread Tld
Matthew Toseland wrote: Fixed default HTL is evil. Add (signed) a random number to each request. Even that is not sufficient. If you access a site with lots of images and many of the requests go through a particular node, then it can deduce a probability for you being the originator, which

[freenet-support] getting bigger - time to raise defaults

2002-11-05 Thread Zlatin Balevsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | high if it's a big freesite. The correct response is to implement | mixmastered first two hops, which we will not implement before 1.0. This is all nice and good, but please consider raising the defaults even if by just a little _now_. It will

[freenet-support] getting bigger - time to raise defaults?

2002-11-04 Thread Zlatin Balevsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The network is getting bigger and bigger. Most of my requests DNF with htl 15 but are retrieved with 25. Maybe its time to up the defaults a bit. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -