Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:09:58 +0200, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On WOCHENTAG, tT. MONAT 23:21:53 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > And, I still don't quite understand why you can't check the status > > of a socket, or be notified of wget's FIN signal (It did send one, > > didn't it, or am I missing

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-21 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On WOCHENTAG, tT. MONAT 23:21:53 Dennis Nezic wrote: > And, I still don't quite understand why you can't check the status of a > socket, or be notified of wget's FIN signal (It did send one, didn't > it, or am I missing something?) -- isn't that fundamental to any tcp > connection?? As Matth

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:23:35 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:05:55 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:00:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 21:35:44 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:50:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wro

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-18 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:05:55 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:00:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 21:35:44 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:50:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 15:34:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: >

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:00:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 21:35:44 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:50:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 15:34:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:40:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrot

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 21:35:44 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:50:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 15:34:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:40:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 13:20:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > >

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:50:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 15:34:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:40:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 13:20:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:23:00 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > >

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-07 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 15:34:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:40:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 13:20:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:23:00 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:02:14 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > >

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-02 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:40:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 02 Sep 2011 13:20:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:23:00 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:02:14 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:44:17 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: >

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 13:20:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:23:00 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:02:14 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:44:17 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > netstat (netstat -pnat | grep java) shows 213 connections to

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-02 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:23:00 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:02:14 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:44:17 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > netstat (netstat -pnat | grep java) shows 213 connections to my > > > fproxy at 127.0.0.1:, in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state.

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-09-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:02:14 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:44:17 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > netstat (netstat -pnat | grep java) shows 213 connections to my > > fproxy at 127.0.0.1:, in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state. I only noticed > > this after I could no longer access fproxy

Re: [freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:44:17 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > netstat (netstat -pnat | grep java) shows 213 connections to my fproxy > at 127.0.0.1:, in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state. I only noticed this after > I could no longer access fproxy -- probably because of some thread or > connection limit. I'm no

[freenet-support] http fproxy ports are not closed

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
netstat (netstat -pnat | grep java) shows 213 connections to my fproxy at 127.0.0.1:, in a "CLOSE_WAIT" state. I only noticed this after I could no longer access fproxy -- probably because of some thread or connection limit. I'm not exactly sure how to reproduce this -- it's not simply a matter