[freenet-support] install - java issues?

2001-06-15 Thread Ashraf Shaaban

During installation the program said it couldn't find the 'java interpreter'
and directed me to download a JRE.  Did as much and it still doesn't work.
Asks me to update setting when after I thought it works and I finally had to
cancel out of it.  Help pls.  Thx

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support



Re: [freenet-support] install - java issues?

2001-06-15 Thread Dave Hooper

For the benefit of people who can't be bothered to read the list archives at
http://lists.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/
, I will be re-sending the following email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
every 12 hours.

 This seems to be a very common problem so I've decided to look into it.
 The Sun JRE 1.1.8_007 does NOT install files named java.exe and javaw.exe
 which is the general assumption for a java runtime environment (JRE)
 Instead, the Sun JRE 1.1.8_007 installs files named jre.exe and
 jrew.exe.  The part of the freenet installer that looks for a Java
runtime
 environment only searches for java.exe and javaw.exe and hence the Sun
 JRE 1.1.8_007 is NOT found because it uses incorrect filenames.

 Because of this incompatibility I recommend you use an alternative JRE.
 For example, Sun JRE 1.3.1:

 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/download-windows.html


 There is a remote possibility that a future freenet installer may be
tested
 against Sun JRE 1.1.8_007 and that it may be modified to seek for
jre.exe
 and jrew.exe as alternative java interpreters.

 Dave

Did I say that?  I meant we ain't ever gonna support Sun JRE 1.1.x

The following is from the Freenet Bugtracker:

 Date: 2001-06-11 21:57
 Sender: nobody
 Logged In: NO

 Please update the site to reflect this reccomendation
 (read requirement?), as pages like
 http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=quickstart
 claim that any JRE higher than 1.1 will do.  Some of us
 still have Sun JRE 1.1.8 since it's the what came packaged
 with StarOffice.  :)

followed by

 Date: 2001-06-14 12:52
 Sender: nobody
 Logged In: NO

 I think the claim is meant to indicate that any JRE higher
 than 1.1.xxx will work.
 E.g.  1.2.xxx

 The installation program has been changed to display a
 message to this effect when a compatible java.exe cannot be
 found.



Finally, one active developer in the Freenet world has this to say

 I like your idea of mandating the use of Sun Java 1.3
 This will make Freenet vastly easier to support, mark my words.
 Underlying message to user is Install Sun JRE 1.3, or forget about
running
 Freenet.

Ok? ok.


Dave

- Original Message -
From: Ashraf Shaaban [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: [freenet-support] install - java issues?


 During installation the program said it couldn't find the 'java
interpreter'
 and directed me to download a JRE.  Did as much and it still doesn't work.
 Asks me to update setting when after I thought it works and I finally had
to
 cancel out of it.  Help pls.  Thx

 ___
 Support mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support



___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support



Re: [freenet-support] install - java issues?

2001-06-15 Thread Greg Wooledge

Dave Hooper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 For the benefit of people who can't be bothered to read the list archives at
 http://lists.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/
 , I will be re-sending the following email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 every 12 hours.

How will that help?  Anyone who can't be bothered to check the archives
probably isn't subscribed before asking for help.

-- 
Greg Wooledge  |   Truth belongs to everybody.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/ |

 PGP signature


Re: [freenet-support] install - java issues?

2001-06-15 Thread Mr . Bad

 DH == Dave Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

DH Finally, one active developer in the Freenet world has this to
DH say

 I like your idea of mandating the use of Sun Java 1.3 This will
 make Freenet vastly easier to support, mark my words.
 Underlying message to user is Install Sun JRE 1.3, or forget
 about running Freenet.

Personally, I think this suX0rs. I don't know much about the state of
Free JVMs on Windows, but I'm pretty damn sure that none of them are
going to support JDK 1.3 stuff.

Freenet is an Open Source Java project. We should support people who
want to use Open Source Java systems. Mandating a particular
proprietary JVM is lame.

If we can't manage to add two or three more strings (kaffe.exe,
japhar.exe, jre.exe etc.) to the JVM search facility in the
Windows install, we suck.

~Mr. Bad

-- 
 ~
 Mr. Bad [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ 
 Your description of coffee is how you interpret Sex.
  -- Personality Quiz chain letter
 ~

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support