[freenet-support] results w/527
Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45, pooled jobs at 98, java processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+. Bandwidth adjustments via freenet.conf have zero effect. OTH, I don't see in the support thread that others are having the same issue with saturation of the actual net connection that I am. Is it possible I'm being messed w/ by my provider, Earthlink? They have essentially no stated limits on what I'm allowed to do with this connection as long as it's not openly illegal. Any advice would be much appreciated. At this point I cannot run a node and maintain a connection to the net for any other purpose, and I sort of suspect the node is not working worth a s**t this way either. -- Democracies die behind closed doors. - Judge Damon Keith ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] results w/527
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:19:31PM -0500, Doug Bostrom wrote: Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45, pooled jobs at 98, java processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+. You did use the up to date start-freenet.sh, or nice -n 10 it directly? That should reduce the impact a lot. Bandwidth adjustments via freenet.conf have zero effect. OTH, I don't see in the support thread that others are having the same issue with saturation of the actual net connection that I am. Is it possible I'm being messed w/ by my provider, Earthlink? They have essentially no stated limits on what I'm allowed to do with this connection as long as it's not openly illegal. Any advice would be much appreciated. At this point I cannot run a node and maintain a connection to the net for any other purpose, and I sort of suspect the node is not working worth a s**t this way either. Interesting. The bandwidth limiter is not working then? -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ msg01773/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] results w/527
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:28:29PM -0800, Mike wrote: i just updated to 527, and now im at 89-133% this time , it is dragging my system to a crawl :P bleh... the fun starts. Use the new start-freenet-sh, from the tarball. Or if in windoze, use the new wininstaller. - Original Message - From: Doug Bostrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:19 PM Subject: [freenet-support] results w/527 Pipe still saturates. I cut maxthreads to 40, then 20. Connections stayed at 45, pooled jobs at 98, java processes somewhere over 100. Load at 90+. Bandwidth adjustments via freenet.conf have zero effect. OTH, I don't see in the support thread that others are having the same issue with saturation of the actual net connection that I am. Is it possible I'm being messed w/ by my provider, Earthlink? They have essentially no stated limits on what I'm allowed to do with this connection as long as it's not openly illegal. Any advice would be much appreciated. At this point I cannot run a node and maintain a connection to the net for any other purpose, and I sort of suspect the node is not working worth a s**t this way either. -- Democracies die behind closed doors. - Judge Damon Keith ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ msg01774/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] results w/527
10/29/02 9:59:00 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting. The bandwidth limiter is not working then? Not as far as I can tell, or least very little. I have bandwidth set to 8k both ways, threads set to 20, and I'm showing something like 200 processes right just now and my connection is choked. I'll have to turn the node off to get this posting out. Very odd. In fact, it really does not seem to matter if I adjust anything to do with resources- the node instantly gobbles everything once it has announced. Yum-yum, burp, want more! I don't think nicing will help, since I'm not using the box for anything else and all things being equal the threads presumably will be end up sharing system resources nicely. Bear in mind that things _were_ working perfectly up until yesterday before The Posting. All the same, other than the node announcement chitchat storm (and judging from the comments I saw on Slashdot it's really hard to say how many actually managed to accomplish anything besides wiping out their own porn and music collections and then throwing tantrums when they were not instantly presented with infinite free goodies), I wonder if as Freenet becomes more popular the kind of traffic you're seeing now will be normal. Maybe these are the first symptoms of chronic leaching. The classic peer-peer networks essentially forced people to contribute if they wanted to participate, while Freenet does not and probably cannot because of routing issues. Don't know, but only one thing to do, keep trying. As a US citizen I'm obligated to help offset the damage we've done by firewalling China... ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
