On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> Thanks for the response anyway. :-) And don't feel bad about your "ignorance"
> in certain areas. Most of us are still learning as we go here. :-)
Including me! There's plenty of parts of the code that I'm not familiar
with, an
On 05-Apr-2004 Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Thanks for all the confusion.
>
> Perhaps unstable could be named the Linux Freenet and leave the stable as
> Freenet. And the indexes aren't really of much value to Freenet currently
> in any case. Or perhaps both could be rename Broadband Freenet and not
Thanks for all the confusion.
Perhaps unstable could be named the Linux Freenet and leave the stable as
Freenet. And the indexes aren't really of much value to Freenet currently
in any case. Or perhaps both could be rename Broadband Freenet and not
confuse the rest of us into exploring any of it
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 09:38:09PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> I wish I could answer you, but I have no idea what you are talking about.
> Sorry. Much here is not clear to those that have not been worth the
> developed throughout it's complete evolution.
Conrad has changed the way that DFI (t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Conrad Sabatier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 04-Apr-2004 Troed Sångberg wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:58:45 -0600 (CST), Conrad Sabatier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
most of them into a zip file. This helps in two ways: 1) The zipped
container
is much smaller than t
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 14:22:21 +0300, Mika Hirvonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bad idea. If you do that, stable users will start to complain about
inaccessible unstable sites and vice versa. You could release the
sources and let someone else maintain the spider/index site for stable.
... and tha
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
On 04-Apr-2004 Troed Sångberg wrote:
For Freenet to attract new user - TFE would need to be replaced with DFI.
Displaying TFE to new users is equivalent with putting up a big sign that
says "Freenet is dead - no new content is produced here".
Hmmm. Good point.
On 04-Apr-2004 Troed Sångberg wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:58:45 -0600 (CST), Conrad Sabatier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> most of them into a zip file. This helps in two ways: 1) The zipped
>> container
>> is much smaller than the combined original, uncompressed files, making
>> f
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:58:45 -0600 (CST), Conrad Sabatier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
most of them into a zip file. This helps in two ways: 1) The zipped
container
is much smaller than the combined original, uncompressed files, making
for
faster downloads, and 2) The site is made more reliab
On 02-Apr-2004 Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> I wish I could answer you, but I have no idea what you are talking about.
> Sorry. Much here is not clear to those that have not been worth the
> developed throughout it's complete evolution.
Converting the site to use a container simply means that I've re
I wish I could answer you, but I have no idea what you are talking about.
Sorry. Much here is not clear to those that have not been worth the
developed throughout it's complete evolution.
> [Original Message]
> From: Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Freenet development mailing list <[
11 matches
Mail list logo
