RE: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Level 13

 One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
 humanly readable? Currently my setting is logLevel=Normal. The log
 seems pretty raw, though.

For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...


For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
etc. are pretty much human readable at first glance.

However, the Freenet logs I see are quite dense, e.g.:

EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=23 23 times
May 19, 2006 11:56:36 AM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading
thread, ERROR): Consecutive same winner:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: timeToSendWindow=0,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766
af6e 4bbc 0974 3e57),tcp/82.46.27.42:31562, sessions=1,
presentations=3, ID=DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766 af6e 4bbc 0974
3e57), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5106): outbound attempts=0:0/0 on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=acaca359c0720e83,
expiresAt=1148032633105 (36437 ms),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @null @
acaca359c0720e83,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@acaca359c0720e83,true@
-1:1148032573105:false:null:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DataRequest @null @ acaca359c0720e83, sendTimeout=17720,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(f15883c3a4d1fd058004501bd332d74d54a9e0fa120302,request),
EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=24 24 times

but that's just one line of it...


By the way, I wanted to update my node to 5107 today, but without
success. At first I tried the update snapshot, but the download
speed quickly went to 0.2 kB/s and then it stopped (I remember it's
the same problem as last year). Then I downloaded both
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-java-webinstall.exe and
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-webinstall.exe
to try one or another, but none of them was able to download certain
files (e.g. nodeconfig.exe, freenet-ext.jar...). My Freenet
web-interface shows I still have Build 5106.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-20 Thread Matthew Toseland
You don't need 5107 if your node already works. It fixed a problem with
starting up. If you do want a new version, download the jar. Apache is
stable, and way past 1.0; Freenet isn't. Apache logs are designed to
help people analyse the usage of their sites, not to help debug apache -
at the normal website level of logging anyway. Freenet logs are designed
to help people debug freenet.

On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Level 13 wrote:
  One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
  humanly readable? Currently my setting is logLevel=Normal. The log
  seems pretty raw, though.
 
 For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
 
 For example, Apache's logs, as well as mail servers', ftp servers'
 etc. are pretty much human readable at first glance.
 
 However, the Freenet logs I see are quite dense, e.g.:
 
 EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
 noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=23 23 times
 May 19, 2006 11:56:36 AM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading
 thread, ERROR): Consecutive same winner:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: timeToSendWindow=0,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766
 af6e 4bbc 0974 3e57),tcp/82.46.27.42:31562, sessions=1,
 presentations=3, ID=DSA(be87 a7cd de62 e94a 540b  7766 af6e 4bbc 0974
 3e57), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.51,5106): outbound attempts=0:0/0 on
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=acaca359c0720e83,
 expiresAt=1148032633105 (36437 ms),
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @null @
 acaca359c0720e83,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@acaca359c0720e83,true@
 -1:1148032573105:false:null:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 DataRequest @null @ acaca359c0720e83, sendTimeout=17720,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (f15883c3a4d1fd058004501bd332d74d54a9e0fa120302,request),
 EstimateList=freenet.node.rt.ForgettingEstimateList: length=77, at=0,
 noConnCount=0, backedOffCount=24 24 times
 
 but that's just one line of it...
 
 
 By the way, I wanted to update my node to 5107 today, but without
 success. At first I tried the update snapshot, but the download
 speed quickly went to 0.2 kB/s and then it stopped (I remember it's
 the same problem as last year). Then I downloaded both
 http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-java-webinstall.exe and
 http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-webinstall.exe
 to try one or another, but none of them was able to download certain
 files (e.g. nodeconfig.exe, freenet-ext.jar...). My Freenet
 web-interface shows I still have Build 5106.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Firewall settings, log output

2006-05-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 08:26:15PM +0200, Level 13 wrote:
 In this section of FAQ
 http://freenet.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=faq#firewall
 it says that in freenet.ini you are supposed to change entries at
 node.ipAddressOverride and node.listenPort. However, I don't have
 these entries in configuration file; I only have ipAddress=...
 (where I used to have my IP, but now I have my DynDNS address) and
 listenPort=... (with the port that was added after installing
 Freenet; this port is also port-forwarded in my router/firewall).
 Why the discrepancy -- is the FAQ for 0.7 already, or maybe for Linux 
 version?

Yes, it's ipAddress and listenPort on 0.5.
 
 One more question... Is it feasible to expect Freenet logs to be more
 humanly readable? Currently my setting is logLevel=Normal. The log
 seems pretty raw, though.

For example? Logs at normal should be quite sparse...
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]