RE: [freenet-support] Freenet is fading away...

2003-12-12 Thread Pete
Amen to that Ian, 0.4 was WAY better than 0.3 (eventually ;) Pete >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Clarke >Sent: 12 December 2003 01:14 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet is fadi

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet is fading away...

2003-12-12 Thread Art Charbonneau
riginal Message - From: Ian Clarke To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:14 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet is fading away... Um, thanks for the pessimism I guess.Some of us are working very hard to figure out how to address the problems we are s

RE: [freenet-support] Freenet is fading away...

2003-12-11 Thread Nicholas Sturm
Freenet is a lot more complicate in its necessary methods to get to it's goal than writing a card game or even an editor,... and the first editions of those took many months of work and many failures.   Encrypting and decrypting require a considerable amount of resources, thus time, and finding a

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet is fading away...

2003-12-11 Thread Ian Clarke
Um, thanks for the pessimism I guess. Some of us are working very hard to figure out how to address the problems we are seeing, but I guess others just want to benefit from this research project without accepting the risks. Fortunately, most seem to accept that sometimes, when you are on the c