Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Someone wrote: > Herve Lefebvre schrieb: > > > > >Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. > > Well maybe there will be one in the future. > > >But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I > >tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some > >others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. > > It is very slow, at least compared to non java apps. But the node seems to > run > much smoother with the 1.4.1_06 JRE. But I'm still getting some of theses: > > jobPartDone(473) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: > *removed*>local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], > sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], > chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[closed]], peer=[Peer [DSA(*removed*) > @ *removed* (1/3)]], outbound=[false]] but sendingPacket == null! > > Seems to be a bug within the mux code, maybe some sort of a timing problem > due to my slow machine. But I really can't say more because I'm not a Java > programmer (well I had to learn it for 6 months due my studies but the > school > dropped it because it is not really a programming language worth to use for > bigger apps). Yeah, Fred is only 130kloc... -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: > > > Niklas Bergh schrieb: > > > >> Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 > >> one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can > >> download it. > > > > Seems to be only 1.3.1 > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/wsdk/ > > Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. > > But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I > tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some > others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. Sun JVM has no JIT under linux?! Can anyone confirm this? It seems rather unlikely... > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
> Niklas Bergh schrieb: > >> Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 >> one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can >> download it. > > Seems to be only 1.3.1 > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/wsdk/ Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
RE: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Someone > Sent: den 16 januari 2004 13:51 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k > > > Herve Lefebvre schrieb: > > > What kind of errors ? > > I already reported them here and mailed some log files to toad. > > > or maybe a configuration problem. > > It is mainly on default configuration, I just had to reduce > the max connections to 80 because of my "cheap" SOHO router. > And with the builds previous to 5054 (the non mux builds) it > run for days without errors in the log, CPU and memory usage > was quite high but it didn't stall. > > > I'm running with the IBM JVM 1.4.1 wich has (at least under linux) > > dramatically better performances than the SUN JVM. > > Is there a stand alone JRE from IBM? I just found the big JDK > for Windows, which isn't good according to the readme of fred. Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. /N ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
