Has anyone considered trying to get a WRAP and PfSense working with a PCMCIA
interface and the Verizon wireless cards?
I have been thinking about this for a while and thought it would be worth a
post to see what sort of trouble I could stir up :)
I have already been successful getting the
Hi guys!
After the release of V. 0.92 (and then pulled), I didn't see any other
release... Maybe we are at the final stages, before v1.0!?
Great work, guys, and thank you again!!
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
odd cuz my soekris box works just fine
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 19:02 +0100, Kruno (DON'T REPLY HERE) wrote:
Barry Kiesz wrote:
Well.. I wouldn't say it worked, it just wouldn't boot past the Phys
C/H/S 999/16/63 Log C/H/S 499/32/63 part
Barry
I can't understand what was so radically
There will be further releases. Beta stage has not yet started but things are
getting there ;-)
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tommaso Di Donato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. November 2005 12:10
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] New
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01 community webapp. Our newest version adds broadcast
Hello,
Why is it, when Static ARP entries are enabled, a user which is not in
the DHCP client list still `sees` the server ? (can ping, etc)
Even if the user uses an ip that is in the list, and the mac is
different, it can still connect to captive portal for example.
How to get around this ?
Hi,
anybody attending EuroBSDCon later this month (25-27. Nov. 2005) in
Basel, Switzerland?
I've just registered and thought it would be nice to have some sort of
informal gathering (hopefully with some of the senior devs) to ask many
of the wanted to ask anyway and does it actually
I don't know of any developers going. We're mostly in the states.
Scott
On 11/8/05, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
anybody attending EuroBSDCon later this month (25-27. Nov. 2005) in
Basel, Switzerland?
I've just registered and thought it would be nice to have some sort of
This is why I am asking, I think it would be slick to have a self contained
wireless router that works almost anywhere you can get a Verizon signal.
VERY slick!
Been drooling over this idea for a while, I emailed PC Engines, maybe they
will consider a board with a PCMCIA slot.
--Todd
-
For this task you could use a Soekris 4511 which has a PCMCIA slot. I
however have no clue if FreeBSD has support for the verizon.
On 11/8/05, Mojo Jojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I am asking, I think it would be slick to have a self contained
wireless router that works almost
COOL!
There are Linux drivers, not sure if someone can port them.
Thanks..
Any chance PfSense will work with this?
Can it maybe see it as a NIC or a Modem?
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:45 AM
Check the FreeBSD hardware compatibility list.
On 11/8/05, Mojo Jojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
COOL!
There are Linux drivers, not sure if someone can port them.
Thanks..
Any chance PfSense will work with this?
Can it maybe see it as a NIC or a Modem?
- Original Message -
From:
Interesting, sounds like a bug. Are these clients on LAN or other
interface? I wonder if we made this only work on LAN.
--Bill
On 11/8/05, Szasz Revai Endre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Why is it, when Static ARP entries are enabled, a user which is not in
the DHCP client list still
Hello,Is this a bad
idea ?http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=678I am aware that when a
new dhcp client is added, then the firewall rules would need to be updated
:(Sorry about the earlier email, i totally forgot that it's not yet
possible to filter by mac address.
On 11/8/05, Szasz-Revai Endre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is this a bad idea ?
Not really.
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=678
I am aware that when a new dhcp client is added, then the firewall rules
would need to be updated :(
We're in a feature freeze and this is not
These are on LAN, it's weird..
For a client on the LAN, I have deleted a DHCP mac/ip entry, and that
client would still have access to the captive portal, or any other
service pfsense would offer.
On 11/8/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, sounds like a bug. Are these
On 11/8/05, Szasz Revai Endre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are on LAN, it's weird..
For a client on the LAN, I have deleted a DHCP mac/ip entry, and that
client would still have access to the captive portal, or any other
service pfsense would offer.
So basically there was a static-arp entry
Quoth Mojo Jojo:
There are Linux drivers, not sure if someone can port them.
There are NO linux drivers ;-)... Errr... Well, I am actually working with
Aircard 580 and Kyocera 650.
Can it maybe see it as a NIC or a Modem?
The AC580 and KPC650 are - surprise - a USB hub, carrying two USB
Thinking that the hardware could be the issue, I took the CF card out of a
working wrap and dropped it into the suspect board and it booted just fine,
telling me that it appeared to be either a bad load on the CF card or the card
itself. I a little nervous loading the new software onto the
Szasz Revai Endre wrote:
No, a reboot doesn't fix the error.
The problem is, as I see, that no client is denied on the network
(none of those who have static ip addresses), everyone has access to
this machine (pfsense).
to the firewall itself, yeah. The anti-lockout rule assures that.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
I don't know of any developers going. We're mostly in the states.
yeah, but at least Scott and I should be at BSDCan 2006. A much more
affordable trip for most of us.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Well here's the update... I went out and bought a 128MB CF card (Sandisk),
loaded .90 and it appears to be working as I'm sending this over the wireless
card on the wrap board through a hotel connection connected to the WAN port
(all DHCP assigned) . So out of curiousity looked at the old CF
Of course, that is normal.
But for example any client on the network has access to the captive
portal and to echo request, which is normal?
If i turn that anti lockout rule off, this shouldn't be possible ?
On 11/9/05, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to the firewall itself, yeah. The
23 matches
Mail list logo
