Hi All,
can somebody help me here?
I'm replacing the current pfSense box (2800-Athlon desktop w/ 3 D-Link GBit NICs) with a Acrosser AR-B1662 based 19 box (4 build-in NICs). I don't want to loose the usage data of the old box, but still a fresh install will tidy up old unused config date
On 6/14/06, Holger Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can somebody help me here?
I'm replacing the current pfSense box (2800-Athlon desktop w/ 3 D-Link GBit
NICs) with a Acrosser AR-B1662 based 19 box (4 build-in NICs). I don't
want to loose the usage data of the old box, but still a fresh
Thanks Scott!
That worked well - even though i used scp to copy the file across the boxes :-)
Also on this place a big THANK YOU for your and all the contributors efforts making pfSense as good as it is!!
Cheers,
Holger
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:41 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 6/14/06,
Hi!
We have a requirement to divert certain traffic out of our building (via
pfsense) on a different route than that of our main ADSL feed. This is
so we can present a different IP to the destination host we're
connecting to from that of our main office IP.
Is there a reasonably straightforward
On 6/14/06, Steve Harman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
We have a requirement to divert certain traffic out of our building (via
pfsense) on a different route than that of our main ADSL feed. This is
so we can present a different IP to the destination host we're
connecting to from that of our
What needs to be done to set the specific IP address that is seen/used for the
traffic? For example, using a static arp address instead of the main
interface address.
Robert
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 12:51, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 6/14/06, Steve Harman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
We
On 6/14/06, Robert Goley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What needs to be done to set the specific IP address that is seen/used for the
traffic? For example, using a static arp address instead of the main
interface address.
Nothing needs set. Setup the 2nd wan and start passing traffic.
This might have been noticed by the devs already, but I wasn't sure where to
check, so I am asking here...
On the Firewall: Rules: Edit page, Source section, the Type drop-down
includes choices for LAN address and WAN address; should it not also
include however many OPTx address interfaces you
Most likely. However this is not something we can fix for 1.0. This
type of change could break other areas, and we have had enough
breakage for this release cycle. Please create a ticket on CVSTRAC
and we will get this fixed for 1.1.
On 6/14/06, Brian Neufeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
Hi all,
I'm having a little trouble with figuring out how firewall rules that
would block port 80 interact with squid when the transparent proxying
feature is enabled. If I put a simple block from x.x.x.x to any port 80
type rule in, the user still has access to the web via squid.
What's
10 matches
Mail list logo
