upgrade to 1.2-RC2 and try again. I'm sure whatever was causing this has
been fixed a while ago
-Sean
- Original Message -
From: "Sonny Sarai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:56 PM
Subject: [pfSense Support] Unless I disable filter in Advanced setting, I
can
On 8/22/07, Sonny Sarai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running pfsense 1.0.1. I am new to pfsense. Nobody inside the
> network can send attachments over 48Kb if the filters are enabled in
> advanced settings. If I check off the check box in advanced settings, I
> can send well over 48
Hello,
I am running pfsense 1.0.1. I am new to pfsense. Nobody inside the
network can send attachments over 48Kb if the filters are enabled in
advanced settings. If I check off the check box in advanced settings, I
can send well over 48Kb. I tried disabling every rule and turning them
on one b
Does anyone have any experience with this? Is it stable? Tips?
--Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "support"
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 2:27:00 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
Subject: [pfSense Support] Multiple Subnet Transparent Bridging?
After being
I did a little more testing and if I remove the certs in the
System-Advanced function and set the webGUI protocol to http (or https)
in the System-> General Setup, it works without failure. Still doing
some more checking.
Where would I find the source code for pfSense so that we can possibly
If you are using the reauthenticate users every minute against an
external Radiusserver with the CP that might explain the load. Search
the m0n0list for the designlimitations of the current CP implementation
and why that will cause problems when having lots of users. We currently
don't do any work
4801 will be too weak for this or at least run under heavy load all the
time. If you want to use some services and need ipsec encryption for
example it will definately be too weak. Go for a 5501. I heard from one
of the developers that it performs pretty good.
Holger
> -Original Message-
Thanks Vivek
This hub was placed between the cable modem and the WAN for data capture
purposes only, prior was just a direct patch cable connection, no apparent need
for a switch/hub intermediary as the Motorola seems to accept direct and
crossover cables, at least I have not tried a cross over
Greetings list,
I know there've been discussions on the m0n0wall list in the past regarding
throughput benchmarking on Soekris platforms. Would those same figures also
apply to pfSense?
If not, has anyone done any benchmarking on 4801/5501 boards they'd be willing
to share with the list?
I'm
