The FreeRadius log seems to be located at /var/log/radius.log. According to the
current package, there is no logging set up in the package, so you basically
have to ssh into pfSense to look at the log.
What's involved in "web enabling" the FreeRADIUS log? (looked in the forums,
didn't find much
Yep, got it figured out. I just ssh'd into the pfSense install and ftp'd the
files out, made the changes, and ftp'd them back into /usr/local/pkg... I just
made what I think are the appropriate mods to the files, just need to test them
with the switches and make sure everything works as expected
Or just replace the chenged files in your pfsense-install (using putty or
WinSCP when using windows)
The files are mostly placed under /usr/local/xxx (have a look there)
Try your changes and fix all errors... then send your patches using diff-rub to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:-)
Martin
-Ursprüng
On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
> into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
> using the dev iso?
Look in the packages are on the forum where there is a good howto.
Scott
--
Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
using the dev iso?
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 1
On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where would I go if I wanted to grab the source of the FreeRADIUS package
> and potentially add some features?
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/
> I am looking to add some support for additional parameters to return to
Where would I go if I wanted to grab the source of the FreeRADIUS
package and potentially add some features?
I am looking to add some support for additional parameters to return to
radius clients-for example, I am setting up a network for a couple of
office buildings, and they purchased two HP
On Feb 11, 2008 9:25 AM, Holger Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Anders,
>
> This is no recommendation, just a FYI, but:
> Did you come across this website: http://www.myus.com/ - i never tried, but
> it might be a way. I know there are US based mail order companies willing to
> ship to
On Feb 11, 2008 8:12 AM, Royce Mitchell III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, please forgive my ignorance, but if you have two redundant routers
> servicing your BGP, how will they decide who is going to handle a packet
> without some sort of CARP/VRRP communication between them?
OpenBSD does pla
Adam Armstrong wrote:
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Okay, please forgive my ignorance, but if you have two redundant
routers servicing your BGP, how will they decide who is going to
handle a packet without some sort of CARP/VRRP communication between
them?
There are a number of mechanisms for doin
Hi Anders,
This is no recommendation, just a FYI, but:
Did you come across this website: http://www.myus.com/ - i never tried,
but it might be a way. I know there are US based mail order companies
willing to ship to such a address.
Holger
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 10:18 +0100, Anders Dahl wrote
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Adam Armstrong wrote:
Carp is unnecessary when using BGP, as the provider sees routes into
your network via the individual devices and both devices see routes out.
You wouldn't want to run BGP from a CARP IP anyawys, as it would
result in BGP flapping when the CARP s
Adam Armstrong wrote:
Carp is unnecessary when using BGP, as the provider sees routes into
your network via the individual devices and both devices see routes out.
You wouldn't want to run BGP from a CARP IP anyawys, as it would
result in BGP flapping when the CARP switched.
adam.
Okay, plea
Hi,
would it be possible to have the carp status page also show the carp
description field, as as the moment it's not very informative.
AtDhVaAnNkCsE
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
Paul M wrote:
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Is the BGP package for pfsense available, yet?
Also, does it play nice with CARP, or is CARP even necessary when you
have BGP?
I think CARP is a very different thing - BGP is a way of having multiple
circuits to different ISPs to get resilience
I believe that is my PCAnywhere problem; I haven't allowed remote VPN
tunnels to UDP scan the LAN for listening PCAW hosts. Any insight
here? I am missing something trivial here.
Thanks guys,
Gabe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
given the a number of minor bug fixes, we will be seeing a 1.2RC5
variant sometime, or is the next step a full release?
thanks
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
> Is the BGP package for pfsense available, yet?
>
> Also, does it play nice with CARP, or is CARP even necessary when you
> have BGP?
I think CARP is a very different thing - BGP is a way of having multiple
circuits to different ISPs to get resilience internet connectiv
18 matches
Mail list logo
