My only input into the matter is that if you NEED ipv6 implemented into pfSense
that you submit a proposal to the developers through their corporate support
for development services. They have stated before that from a hobbyist
development point of view, they do not have access to ipv6 systems t
RB wrote:
I suggest we take our heads out of the sand and start deploying IPv6 stuff.
It is regrettable you consider asking for a valid business case for
accelerating a largely hobbyist project to be sticking one's head in
the sand.
I meant this one widely. Much more widely and on lar
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 08:59, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either you believe that IPv6 is coming, or you don't. I fall in the
> former camp though there are people who believe IPv6 is not necessary.
> I agree that it will be a long time before there are hosts that are
> IPv6 that ar
To preface: I'm not making arguments against IPv6; rather against the
lack of sound reasoning being the driving force behind it. I like the
next shiny obstacle as much as the next engineer, but have had too
much PHB experience to allow it to distract me from making a valid
case.
>> This question
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Personally I don't like the idea of two separate firewalls, pfsense for IPv4
>> and whatever else for IPv6. But, sadly, this is what I am doing now.
>
> Yet you still do not answer the question - what value is v6 providing
> you now
> I suggest we take our heads out of the sand and start deploying IPv6 stuff.
It is regrettable you consider asking for a valid business case for
accelerating a largely hobbyist project to be sticking one's head in
the sand.
> Personally I don't like the idea of two separate firewalls, pfsense fo
For the archives:
All problems have been finally solved.
* Multiple DSL Routers on the same physical interface -> Solved by
setting up VLANS and connecting each DSL Router on a separate VLAN
* Random Lock-ups with console freeze and lots of colleagues complaining
-> Solved with 1.2.1 RC1 (bu
Finally, it's solved. ACPI was disabled on the BIOS, but at the same
time we Enabled it, we also enabled the "Use device polling" Feature...
so, one of these two actions actually solved the problem.
Thanks everybody for your help.
Paul Mansfield escribió:
another thought: ensure you disabl
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:33:54PM +0200, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Well you guys want to make money but are trying to push something free!
Free/libre and donations aren't mutex. I donate $10 for every instance of
pfsense I have in production (notice: I'm not making any money yet),
and I've paid for a
Chris Buechler wrote:
> It seems with Gmail it's limited to only me (go figure). Or at least I
I presume when something does end up in spam, you click the "not spam"
to try and re-train?
I don't recall seeing anything in gmail control panel to reset the spam
heuristics, didn't find anything in s
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Do you realize how long hardware deployment takes? Right now
> we're driving at a nearby brick wall with a floored pedal.
at least pfSense is theoretically capable of being upgraded to ipv6, but
there are millions of people still buying cheap routers/modem/switches
(linksys,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Paul Mansfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
>> I have a small business with a /24. In order for me to make money
>> I will soon have to order another /24. And then another.
>
> there's also the problem of getting globally routable PI space - you
Paul Mansfield wrote:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
I have a small business with a /24. In order for me to make money
I will soon have to order another /24. And then another.
there's also the problem of getting globally routable PI space - you
need a /23 to ensure your prefix isn't discarded by s
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> I have a small business with a /24. In order for me to make money
> I will soon have to order another /24. And then another.
there's also the problem of getting globally routable PI space - you
need a /23 to ensure your prefix isn't discarded by some ISPs, but
getting a /23 th
another thought: ensure you disable as much hardware as possible in the
bios if you don't need it... i.e. serial, parallel, usb, mouse.. to free
up interrupts.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hello,
have you tryed to boot w/o acpi?
I have had some Problems with msi-boxes there have an strange
interrupt-configuration.
this looks exactly like this problem, or search through the bios for
issues.
greetings
michael
2008/9/25 Matias Surdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chris Buechler esc
"an addressing crisis" for years, and the fact that someone has
slapped a ruler on the current allocation trend and come up with a
number of days under 1000 doesn't really cause me concern. Who can
present a reasonable case for adoption before the current 2-3 year
timeline?
Do you realiz
Chris Buechler escribió:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Matias Surdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally, we've migrated to 1.2.1 RC1 and seems to be working, at least for
now.
But, we are seeing that the CPU keeps on 50% use, and a top shows that it's
being used by "interrupt".
That's indi
I came across this issue yesterday with Vista Basic Machine SP1, but
using a ZyXEL P-660HW adsl modem/router as the DHCP server. The Vista
machine would get an address from the router if a wired connection was
using, but refused via the wireless card. Setting a static address on
the wireles
19 matches
Mail list logo
