Re: [pfSense Support] Not all Virtual IP's forwarding correctly

2009-03-03 Thread Paul
Curtis LaMasters wrote: Firewall Rules should look something like this... TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.10 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 1st server TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.11 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 2nd server TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.12 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 3rd server NAT rules shou

Re: [pfSense Support] Not all Virtual IP's forwarding correctly

2009-03-03 Thread Paul
Curtis LaMasters wrote: Firewall Rules should look something like this... TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.10 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 1st server TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.11 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 2nd server TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.12 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 3rd server NAT rules shou

Re: [pfSense Support] Not all Virtual IP's forwarding correctly

2009-03-03 Thread Paul
Firewall GW TCP * | * 192.168.2.130 80 * Server 1 TCP * | * 192.168.2.150 80* Server 2 TCP * | * 192.168.2.160 80* Server 3 not working TCP * | * 192.168.2.160 80* Server 3 Works fine NAT Ru

[pfSense Support] VPN pass-through question

2009-03-03 Thread Steve Spencer
All, If you are not using the VPN on the pfsense firewall, but rather passing VPN traffic through the firewall to another server AND you have multiple VPN servers that you are passing WAN traffic to based on the remote IP, is this doable on pfSense? If so, is there a document you can point me

RE: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Issues

2009-03-03 Thread Atkins, Dwane P
My apologies that should say "our pfsenses" and not "our flenses" From: Atkins, Dwane P [mailto:atki...@uthscsa.edu] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:30 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Issues We have been running

[pfSense Support] Captive Portal Issues

2009-03-03 Thread Atkins, Dwane P
We have been running pfSense as a Captive Portal for quite sometime. Lately, our flenses have had services that were locking up. You could view items on the GUI, but could not execute a Captive Portal lookup or a Halt System or Reboot System. And if you ssh'ed into the system, you could not execu

Re: [pfSense Support] Not all Virtual IP's forwarding correctly

2009-03-03 Thread Curtis LaMasters
Firewall Rules should look something like this... TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.10 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 1st server TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.11 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 2nd server TCP | * | * | 192.168.1.12 | 80 (HTTP| * | | NAT HTTP to 3rd server NAT rules should look something like thi

AW: [pfSense Support] Not all Virtual IP's forwarding correctly

2009-03-03 Thread Matthias Niggemeier
Von: Abdulrehman [mailto:arvagabo...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. März 2009 07:16 An: support@pfsense.com Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Not all Virtual IP's forwarding correctly > Don't confuse guys up here...! > 1. where your IP is blocked...at ISP end or somewhere on internet..?

Re: [pfSense Support] Logging IGMP recognized as ESP

2009-03-03 Thread Abdulrehman
This is because IGMP works above the network Layer...thats why it is not recognized as a transport protocol...You should disable IGMP if there is no requirement on your network for it. Regards Abdulrehman On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Simon Gerber wrote: > Why are IGMP Packets recognized as E

[pfSense Support] Minor text change suggestion - OpenNTPD

2009-03-03 Thread Tortise
Hi On the OpenNTPD page I suggest the text be changed from "Select the interface the NTP server will listen on." "Select the interface(s) the NTP server will listen on." I assume this minor change more accurately describes that pfsense seems to be able to serve NTP on multiple LAN interfaces.

[pfSense Support] Logging IGMP recognized as ESP

2009-03-03 Thread Simon Gerber
Why are IGMP Packets recognized as ESP (Encapsulated Security Payload) in GUI? Console: 10:15:43.276143 IP 1.1.1.1 > 224.0.0.1: igmp query v2 [max resp time 20] GUI: Mar 3 10:15:44 WAN 1.1.1.1 224.0.0.1 ESP Regards, Simon -