Hi guys,
first of all, thanks for all the support!
Anyway, unfortunately, after all the hell I've been through with this, our
CEO is not interested in buying a new server:(
But let's put all the smart decisions aside as I have to figure out what
can I replace it with.
The first thing I thought
Am 13.04.2009 um 12:13 schrieb Lenny:
Hi guys,
first of all, thanks for all the support!
Anyway, unfortunately, after all the hell I've been through with
this, our CEO is not interested in buying a new server:(
But let's put all the smart decisions aside as I have to figure
out what can I
Well,
I succeeded in installing m0n0wall before I saw the limitations of it.
Although I did have to use the IDE drive, and not the SCSI.
But would you say it would take care of the traffic I have?
OpenBSD scares me a bit:)
Regarding the iptables stuff, weird as it may sound - the CEO said that
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 06:53, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenBSD scares me a bit:)
It shouldn't, really. The initial installer dialog is awful, but once
you get past it and get stuff running, it's about as smooth and
seamless as any good BSD setup. For that matter, neither pf nor
Hi I'm having trouble trying to browse some websites it loads really
slow is there anything that can help us improve that?
Greetings fellow pfSense'rs-
I'm currently shopping for a decent quad port gigabit NIC for use with pfSense.
I've been finding the Dell PRO/1000VT cards are around for a reasonable price.
Does anyone know if they work properly with pfSense? They're reported to have
the Intel 82575EB or 82576EB
Hello
I have this issue and i solve it reducing de MTU values.
Thanks
Juan Rivera wrote:
Hi I’m having trouble trying to browse some websites it loads really
slow is there anything that can help us improve that?
-
To
Hello TIm
I have not good experiences good igb driver...
My experience was with
http://www.intel.com/Products/Server/Adapters/Gb-ET-Dual-Port/Gb-ET-Dual-Port-overview.htm
that uses 82576.
IMHO better choose one taht is supported by Freebsd 7.0 and uses em driver
Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings
How did you reduce the MTU files? What is happening on my end is that
when I download files it works perfectly fine but when I browse the
internet it take a while to show the page and sometime we get PAGE CAN
NOT BE DISPLAY its getting annoying now and getting a lot of complains
form users can you
I am guessing I can do this with a firmware upgrade? I am not going on about
10 minutes. Can someone please give me an idea of how long this upgrade should
take?
I am using the following to upgrade per our latest conversation.
pfSense-Full-Update-1.2.3-20090407-1323.tgz. If I click on
Hi
Yo have to reduce the MTU of interfaces
ifconfig interface mtu 1380 for example
Do it in LAN and WAN and tell me results
Thanks
Juan Rivera wrote:
How did you reduce the MTU files? What is happening on my end is that
when I download files it works perfectly fine but when
Ok on wan there was nothing on MTU so I put 1300 but still the same
-Original Message-
From: Mikel Jimenez Fernandez [mailto:mi...@irontec.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 12:26 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [SPAM] Re: [pfSense Support]
website
Via console and on both interfaces
Juan Rivera wrote:
Ok on wan there was nothing on MTU so I put 1300 but still the same
-Original Message-
From: Mikel Jimenez Fernandez [mailto:mi...@irontec.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 12:26 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [SPAM] Re:
This is not the way to do this as the configuration will not survive
reboots. You can set the MTU on the interface configuration page for
your WAN interface in the webGUI. I would encourage you to check that
out.
Mikel Jimenez Fernandez wrote:
Hi
Yo have to reduce the MTU of interfaces
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Lenny five2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
first of all, thanks for all the support!
Anyway, unfortunately, after all the hell I've been through with this, our
CEO is not interested in buying a new server:(
heh.. How about sorry, but there is no other
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hello TIm
I have not good experiences good igb driver...
My experience was with
http://www.intel.com/Products/Server/Adapters/Gb-ET-Dual-Port/Gb-ET-Dual-Port-overview.htm
that uses 82576.
IMHO better choose
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Atkins, Dwane P atki...@uthscsa.edu wrote:
I am guessing I can do this with a firmware upgrade? I am not going on about
10 minutes. Can someone please give me an idea of how long this upgrade
should take?
Depends on the specifics of your hardware,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Gary Buckmaster
g...@centipedenetworks.com wrote:
This is not the way to do this as the configuration will not survive
reboots. You can set the MTU on the interface configuration page for your
WAN interface in the webGUI. I would encourage you to check that
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
I don't have any of the cards myself, but the igb cards should perform
considerably better than em cards. Whether the driver is unstable in
combination with one specific piece of hardware (most likely), or one
particular
ok I've done that but still the internet slow the MTU is not at 1400 but
internet slow is there anything else that could be the problem
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:g...@centipedenetworks.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 1:28 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject:
Sounds like you are pulling at straws here - but try and find out what the
root of your problem is. If your packets are fragmented, then yes this will
slow things down - but it could be totally irrelevant to your issue.
If you bypass pfSense is everything fine?
How do your traffic graphs look?
Yeah just called my ISP they are checking on the modem to see if there
is something wrong with it as the MTU was blank before I made any
changes to it, now it got me thinking I have more than 70 computers
connecting to my free BSD you think it can't handle that many ?
-Original Message-
It all depends on throughput levels - but yes, I can pretty much guarantee
it can handle it. (1990's hardware can handle 70 users with modest
throughput), but if you are curious - what are your specs?
I was more wondering if you had a couple machines with malware that may be
pegging out your
23 matches
Mail list logo
