[pfSense Support] gre tunnel support

2009-05-07 Thread Mikel Jimenez
Hi Is possible to make a GRE tunel between two Pfsenses without using IPsec? I look in kldstat that gre module is not loaded Thanks! -- Mikel Jimenez Fernandez Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com +34 94.404.81.82

Re: [pfSense Support] gre tunnel support

2009-05-07 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Mikel Jimenez mi...@irontec.com wrote: Hi Is possible to make a GRE tunel between two Pfsenses without using IPsec? Not with nor without, until 2.0. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question

2009-05-07 Thread Tim Dressel
Hi folks, I've got a captive portal deployed on a simple LAN/WAN configured current PFsense box. All clients that I want to have transparent access to the internet have a MAC bypass entry. All other clients authenticate against the active portal. The mac-bypass has over 300 entries in it. I

Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question

2009-05-07 Thread RB
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote: 1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is what I am seeing expected with 300 entries? I'm sure someone will chime in with the precise ipfw limitation, but this is mostly going to be dependent on

Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question

2009-05-07 Thread Chris Flugstad
I was going to ask what hardware you were running this on.  We have a rather large list of MAC addresses in our captive portal and it works fine.  Its a dual opteron/4 gigs of ram.   Probably overkill, so it wont help you know what you need, but if your running 128  ram or even 256, its bare