I agree completely.
What we were using it for is all our wired clients and wireless *were*
on the same internal lan. The captive portal was enabled on the LAN
interface. All wired clients had mac-bypass entries, and the wireless
clients had to get past the captive portal.
What I'm thinking is
I'm drafting a reply. Be done shortly.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
http://www.integritasystems.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dressel [mailto:tjdres...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 11:11 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
We use the switches in a client's executive office suite buildings. We needed
a way to provide internet access on a per suite basis, and we needed to
provide public addresses on an as-needed basis (if they had a mail server, for
example). We had a previous solution in place, but it was about
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 00:10, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still interested though in anyone out there with large numbers of
mac-bypass entries. Any takers?
At the risk of redundancy, that was rather the point. Other than the
interface of your manually entering them (which is not
