Re: [pfSense Support] bsnmpd eating cpu

2009-05-27 Thread David Burgess
2009/5/26 Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org: The FreeBSD bsnmpd maintainer(s), though I'm not sure who that is. Isn't it Begemot? I can't remember the first name. db - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For

[pfSense Support] arm arch?

2009-05-27 Thread David Burgess
I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would it be a complicated project? With the AMD Geode going EOL, and the Atom being targeted more for ITX and desktop formats, it's getting harder to ignore devices

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

2009-05-27 Thread RB
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote: I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would it be a complicated project? Yes, but not directly because of pfSense. The underlying

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

2009-05-27 Thread David Burgess
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:47 AM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote: I didn't see any discussion on the forums or in the archives of porting pfsense to the arm architecture. Is this on the horizon? Would it be a complicated

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

2009-05-27 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote: That's a good reason. What about using a NetBSD base? I suppose that would be another big job? More than you can imagine. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [pfSense Support] arm arch?

2009-05-27 Thread David Burgess
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote: That's a good reason. What about using a NetBSD base? I suppose that would be another big job? More than you can imagine. I won't try then. Turns