> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
> for use with pfSense:
>>
>> Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
>> http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
>
> those seem good :)
> jsut couldn't find anywhere to sell (thus no price tag). If you have an
>Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
>http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
I don't know about FreeBSD's support of Marvell nics,
but based on my experience with them in Solaris and RHEL
I won't even let one in my site without calling the janitor
and his garbage cart.
Jus
Thanks Chris i gonna upgrade it first
Regards
~Indrajaya Pitra Perdana~
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Indrajaya Pitra Perdana
wrote:
dear support,
I try to whitelist all of google site that have IP address 216.239.32.0/19 ,
and then i restarted the snort services,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Indrajaya Pitra Perdana
wrote:
> dear support,
>
> I try to whitelist all of google site that have IP address 216.239.32.0/19 ,
> and then i restarted the snort services, but somehow it keeps blocking them,
> is there anything that i should do to make this whiteli
dear support,
I try to whitelist all of google site that have IP address
216.239.32.0/19 , and then i restarted the snort services, but somehow
it keeps blocking them, is there anything that i should do to make this
whitelist work ? thx in advance
My snort package is 2.8.2.6_1
Ppsense 1.2.2
On Wed, October 14, 2009 21:52, Jeppe Ãland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Ryan wrote:
I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
for use with pfSense:
>
> Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
> http://www.avalue.com.tw/pro
Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko
wrote:
Hello all!
There must be something simple here. Please explain! Nothing is
coming from
LAN to WAN.
*1.2.3-RC1* built on Wed Apr 22 15:45:47 EDT 2009 with carp on lan
and wan.
LAN=em1
The D945 chipset works with PFSense - I see no reason why it wouldn't work.
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
Sr. Systems Administrator - Atlas Networks, LLC
office: 206.577.3078 | suncadia: 206.210.5450
www.atlasnetworks.us | www.suncadianet.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeppe Øland [ma
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
>>> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
>>> for use with pfSense:
Has anybody tried pfSense with a board like this?
http://www.avalue.com.tw/products/ECM-945GSE.cfm
Regards,
-Jeppe
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
Hello all!
There must be something simple here. Please explain! Nothing is coming from
LAN to WAN.
*1.2.3-RC1* built on Wed Apr 22 15:45:47 EDT 2009 with carp on lan and wan.
LAN=em1
pass in quick on em1 all fla
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> I have multiple DSL lines, but they all have the same GW. I am not load
> balancing, but just want to route VOIP over one, and Internet traffic over
> the other.
>
> When I try to select FW rules to route voip ports out over 1 of the GW's,
I have multiple DSL lines, but they all have the same GW. I am not load
balancing, but just want to route VOIP over one, and Internet traffic
over the other.
When I try to select FW rules to route voip ports out over 1 of the
GW's, it always selects the primary GW. Any way to resolve this wi
Chris Buechler wrote:
Upgrade. We removed rules for CARP interfaces because the OpenBSD
documentation says they shouldn't be there, but it actually does need
to be. It's been added back in RC3.
O thanks that explains everything... I will upgrade... I was wondering
where are all rules for c
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Andreas Fuchs wrote:
> i'm running on 1.2.2, might this be my problem? as it is a production
> environment i don't think it's smart to upgrade to 1.2.3-RC3
>
Yes that's your problem, and it's fine to upgrade to RC3, the final release
won't be much different.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello all!
> There must be something simple here. Please explain! Nothing is coming from
> LAN to WAN.
>
> *1.2.3-RC1* built on Wed Apr 22 15:45:47 EDT 2009 with carp on lan and wan.
> LAN=em1
> pass in quick on em1 all flags S/SA keep st
Keenan Tims wrote:
Quoting Roberto Greiner :
Could it be something mwith the fact that my box is a Xen virtual
server?
Perhaps posting the generated leases file (or an excerpt of it) would
be helpful? I don't see how this would be directly related to your use
of Xen, though I suppose if you
sorry forgot to mention that i see this in the logs:
openvpn[5850]: /etc/rc.filter_configure tun1 1500 1542 192.168.1.1
192.168.1.2 init
openvpn[5850]: /sbin/ifconfig tun1 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 mtu 1500
netmask 255.255.255.255 up
openvpn[5850]: TUN/TAP device /dev/tun1 opened
so i assume t
Thats what i tryed before asking :-) and it was not working
But now i saw this in the pfsense doc:
/Filtering OpenVPN Traffic/
/As of pfSense 1.2.3-RC1 and newer, you can filter incoming OpenVPN
traffic. To do so, browse to Interfaces -> Assign and assign the
appropriate tun interface to an O
Quoting Roberto Greiner :
Could it be something mwith the fact that my box is a Xen virtual server?
Perhaps posting the generated leases file (or an excerpt of it) would
be helpful? I don't see how this would be directly related to your use
of Xen, though I suppose if your network configur
Roberto Greiner wrote:
> Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Roberto Greiner wrote:
>>> Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
>> Roberto Greiner wrote:
>>> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted
>>> (tried to
>>> allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhcp.php
Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhc
Roberto Greiner wrote:
> Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Roberto Greiner wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Pingle wrote:
>>>
Roberto Greiner wrote:
> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
> allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhcp.php on line 48
>How can i create an OPT interface assigned to a tun interface?
I knew that reply I wrote was a bit sloppy:)
Make the OpenVPN config first specifying the Custom Opt as tun0.
Save it.
Then go back to your Interface Assignments and the Network port
selection will now have a tun0 interface.
jlc
--
Hello all!
There must be something simple here. Please explain! Nothing is coming
from LAN to WAN.
*1.2.3-RC1* built on Wed Apr 22 15:45:47 EDT 2009 with carp on lan and wan.
LAN=em1
pass in quick on em1 all flags S/SA keep state label "USER_RULE: "
In logs I have:
pf: 1. 000562 rule 112/0(mat
Hi Joseph
Thans for the fast reply, i think i undertand the idea, but:
How can i create an OPT interface assigned to a tun interface?
If i do: Interfaces -> assign -> add interface i can create an OPT
interface, but i the dropdown i have my phisical interfaces an a plip0
What am i doing wrong
Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhcp.php on line 48
That is during the DHCP lease cleanup routi
Roberto Greiner wrote:
> Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Roberto Greiner wrote:
>>
>>> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
>>> allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhcp.php on line 48
>>>
>>
>> That is during the DHCP lease cleanup routine. Your
>> /var/dhcpd
Jim Pingle wrote:
Roberto Greiner wrote:
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhcp.php on line 48
That is during the DHCP lease cleanup routine. Your
/var/dhcpd/var/db/dhcpd.leases file must be huge. It do
>We have several Road Warrior stile open VPN Users. Today they are
>directly routed to the LAN interface without any Filter Rules.
>New security policies request that we restrict some of the OpenVPN Users.
>
>It's a bit unclear to me how this can be done.
Create an OPT interface (do not assign thi
Roberto Greiner wrote:
> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to
> allocate 35 bytes) in /usr/local/www/services_dhcp.php on line 48
That is during the DHCP lease cleanup routine. Your
/var/dhcpd/var/db/dhcpd.leases file must be huge. It doesn't typically
grow that
From: k_o_l [mailto:k_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:31 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] SIP syslog messages
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone know why SIP syslog messages are showing in unreadable format?
Here is an example:
Oct 12 14:26:37 pf: From:
ta
Hi,
I was configuring CARP, and as a final touch, I chose to enable, inside
the DHCP server, the NTP servers option. When I activated it, pointing
NTP to the LAN-CARP address (in this case 172.16.0.1. The physical LAN
address is 172.16.0.2), I got a blank page with only the following line:
F
Hi all
We have several Road Warrior stile open VPN Users. Today they are
directly routed to the LAN interface without any Filter Rules.
New security policies request that we restrict some of the OpenVPN Users.
It's a bit unclear to me how this can be done.
- Based on their CN we assign them f
33 matches
Mail list logo
