[pfSense Support] BGP routes vanish after 60 seconds

I timed it, and following “bgpctl fib couple”, the routes get inserted into the kernel’s routing table for exactly 60 seconds, then they all disappear again. I have the BGP holdtime set to 65535 seconds, is there a way to find out what my peer has negotiated with me? (I’m not seeing it under bg

Re: [pfSense Support] Maximum New Connections Per Second

On 6/18/10 1:58 PM, Code Ghar wrote: > You both are right that VoIP is a very broad term. So let me clarify. I > am running Asterisk behind pfSense with multiple endpoints, such as ATAs > and softphones, registering to this Asterisk server. Then I have some > trunks with carriers and such. On the c

Re: [pfSense Support] Maximum New Connections Per Second

You both are right that VoIP is a very broad term. So let me clarify. I am running Asterisk behind pfSense with multiple endpoints, such as ATAs and softphones, registering to this Asterisk server. Then I have some trunks with carriers and such. On the carrier side I am not too worried because I kn

Re: [pfSense Support] Maximum New Connections Per Second

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Code Ghar wrote: > In the pfSense book, there's a section (6.6.9.3) titled "Maximum New > Connections / Per Second". It says that "Any IP address exceeding that > number of connections within the given time frame will be blocked for one > hour." When using VoIP, wh

Re: [pfSense Support] Maximum New Connections Per Second

On 6/18/10 1:08 PM, Code Ghar wrote: > In the pfSense book, there's a section (6.6.9.3) titled "Maximum New > Connections / Per Second". It says that "Any IP address exceeding that > number of connections within the given time frame will be blocked for > one hour." When using VoIP, which uses UDP,

[pfSense Support] Maximum New Connections Per Second

In the pfSense book, there's a section (6.6.9.3) titled "Maximum New Connections / Per Second". It says that "Any IP address exceeding that number of connections within the given time frame will be blocked for one hour." When using VoIP, which uses UDP, if one IP sends calls to your VoIP switch wit

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

On 6/18/2010 1:40 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: >> It wouldn't be too difficult to add this to the GUI if we can >> confirm >> that the results are indeed accurate. > > > Well, I can tell you that the numbers returned matched up exactly with what > my ISP wants to bill me for :-) That's certainly a

RE: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

> -Original Message- > From: Jim Pingle [mailto:li...@pingle.org] > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:37 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of > month? > > It wouldn't be too difficult to add this to the GUI if we can > confirm > that the

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

On 6/18/2010 1:28 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: > Thank you very much! I never know how to extract the raw data from rrdlogs, > now I know it's actually not that hard. > > (BTW: the AWK is fine, although you can omit the cut(1) stage in the pipe > simply by having awk add up $2 and $3 instead of $1

RE: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

Thank you very much! I never know how to extract the raw data from rrdlogs, now I know it's actually not that hard. (BTW: the AWK is fine, although you can omit the cut(1) stage in the pipe simply by having awk add up $2 and $3 instead of $1 and $2.) -Adam Thompson Chief Technical Architect,

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

On 6/18/2010 12:04 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: > Is there a way to get this information? Try this command at the CLI, do the values look right when compared to the graph? My awk-fu isn't that good, there's probably a better way to do this: (This should all be one single line) rrdtool fetch /var/db/

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

On Fri, June 18, 2010 13:32, David Burgess wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: > >> vnstat does that. but not for past time (before it is installed). > > Anybody know if vnstat is compact flash friendly? I'm using the > nanobsd image since burning out one CF already,

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > vnstat does that. but not for past time (before it is installed). Anybody know if vnstat is compact flash friendly? I'm using the nanobsd image since burning out one CF already, and this vnstat sounds handy. db --

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

darkstat will give you a rolling month, but I'm not sure what would conveniently do traffic since the start of a given month. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: > I’m trying to determine how much traffic I’ve transferred since the first of > the month; the RRD graphs let me se

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

On Fri, June 18, 2010 13:04, Adam Thompson wrote: > I'm trying to determine how much traffic I've transferred since the first > of the month; the RRD graphs let me see the last month's worth of traffic > but I can't see any way to specify custom ranges. > > I vaguely remember seeing a package that

[pfSense Support] Bandwdith usage since start of month?

I'm trying to determine how much traffic I've transferred since the first of the month; the RRD graphs let me see the last month's worth of traffic but I can't see any way to specify custom ranges. I vaguely remember seeing a package that let me select specific ranges on those graphs but I can'

Re: [pfSense Support] IAX trunk after isp lost connection

belkhiria aymen wrote: > Hi, > I use pfsense version 1.2, > I mean that > pfSense * does not re-register on the remote * after the all mess > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:01 PM, st41ker > wrote: > > On 17/06/2010 20:18, belkhiria aymen wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Re: [pfSense Support] IAX trunk after isp lost connection

Hi, I use pfsense version 1.2, I mean that pfSense * does not re-register on the remote * after the all mess On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:01 PM, st41ker wrote: > On 17/06/2010 20:18, belkhiria aymen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have asterisk under pfsense and IAX Trunk with another asterisk > > when