[pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Rabeendran, Rajeevan
Hello I have a problem when i copy a huge File over 2GB between WAN -LAN -WAN. The Firewall breaks the connection. Is there a limit? It is not a FTP connection, just a normal NFS connecion. Regards Rajeevan - To unsubscribe,

[pfSense Support] PFsense 2.0 roadmap

2010-09-07 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Is there any updated roadmap for pfsense 2.0? When stable version is planned to be released? Thanks, Tonino -- in...@zioniInterazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it to...@interazioni.it

Re: [pfSense Support] Benchmark tool

2010-09-07 Thread Paul Mansfield
On 06/09/10 21:58, bsd wrote: I have made a simple configuration which looks like that : Station_1 WAN pfSense_FW LAN Station_2 it'd be interesting to compare the same hardware running linux; if you don't feel like installing, boot a live CD; just ifconfig the interfaces, and turn on IP

Re: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Paul Mansfield
On 07/09/10 09:41, Rabeendran, Rajeevan wrote: Hello I have a problem when i copy a huge File over 2GB between WAN -LAN -WAN. The Firewall breaks the connection. Is there a limit? It is not a FTP connection, just a normal NFS connecion. I've been able to download DVD ISOs (suse linux

AW: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Rabeendran, Rajeevan
Hello Thank's. Where is the option on the Firewall on anti-virus being unable to scan big file? Our Filesystem is NTFS:-). Thank's and Regards Rajeevan --- Rajeevan Rabeendran System Engineer PLATH PROCITEC Suisse AG

Re: [pfSense Support] Appliance Recommendation for 100 Mbps (DOCSIS 3.0) Service

2010-09-07 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 07:46:05PM -0400, Larry Sampas wrote: The newer Supermicro Atom boards have Intel GB NICs. They also go to 4 GB of ram. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182237cm_re=atom_d510_supermicro-_-13-182-237-_-Product I'm using them (with SSDs) and I like

Re: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Michel Servaes
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Rabeendran, Rajeevan rajeevan.rabeend...@pps-ag.ch wrote: Hello Thank's. Where is the option on the Firewall on anti-virus being unable to scan big file? Our Filesystem is NTFS:-). Thank's and Regards Rajeevan I think he meant on your local computer,

AW: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Rabeendran, Rajeevan
Hello In the WAN side there is a Server (in our Lab) and i have to copy Files from there to my LAN Interface. When I copy an huge File that is more then 2 Gb the Firewall disconneted the connections and shows me that the Source is not. Do you know what I mean? Is just simple WAN to LAN

Re: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Michel Servaes
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rabeendran, Rajeevan rajeevan.rabeend...@pps-ag.ch wrote: Hello In the WAN side there is a Server (in our Lab) and i have to copy Files from there to my LAN Interface. When I copy an huge File that is more then 2 Gb the Firewall disconneted the connections

Re: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread David Burgess
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote: What happens, if you transfer the file in direct (eg. without the pfsense in between ?) Definitely try that. pfsense has a workaround specifically for NFS on System: Advanced: Firewall and NAT (system_advanced_firewall.php).

Re: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread Bradley D. Thornton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I thought there was about a 2GByte file size limit on Ext2 File systems too. On 9/7/2010 7:39 AM, David Burgess wrote: On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote: What happens, if you transfer the file in direct (eg.

Re: [pfSense Support] Over 2GB File can not copy LAN to WAN Pfsense

2010-09-07 Thread David Burgess
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Bradley D. Thornton brad...@northtech.us wrote: I thought there was about a 2GByte file size limit on Ext2 File systems too. Not according to wikipedia, however There are also many userspace programs that can't handle files larger than 2 GB.

Re: [pfSense Support] Benchmark tool

2010-09-07 Thread bsd
Here are the results of the test you have asked : gregober 21:15:31 ~ - iperf -c 1.2.3.5 Client connecting to 1.2.3.5, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 129 KByte (default) [

Re: [pfSense Support] Benchmark tool

2010-09-07 Thread EVGENY YURCHENKO
--- On Tue, 9/7/10, bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote: From: bsd b...@todoo.biz Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Benchmark tool To: support@pfsense.com Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 3:24 PM Here are the results of the test you have asked : gregober 21:15:31 ~ - iperf -c 1.2.3.5

Re: [pfSense Support] Benchmark tool

2010-09-07 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:24 PM, bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote: My main question is why when filtering is enabled do we loose 75% of the throughput… Is this normal figures or not ? Filtering has vastly more overhead than routing, that's normal.

Re: [pfSense Support] PFsense 2.0 roadmap

2010-09-07 Thread Jim Pingle
On 9/7/2010 5:08 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Is there any updated roadmap for pfsense 2.0? When stable version is planned to be released? Closest thing to a roadmap is here: http://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/roadmap The release will happen when it's ready, but hopefully that

Re: [pfSense Support] Benchmark tool

2010-09-07 Thread bsd
Le 7 sept. 2010 à 22:14, Chris Buechler a écrit : On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:24 PM, bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote: My main question is why when filtering is enabled do we loose 75% of the throughput… Is this normal figures or not ? Filtering has vastly more overhead than routing, that's

Re: [pfSense Support] racoon and radius support

2010-09-07 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Dan Candea dan.can...@quah.ro wrote: I'm using 2.0, but there is no support for radius ERROR: /var/etc/racoon.conf:17: radius racoon not configured with --with-libradius the support should be by default? or I need it to set it manually? It wasn't set

Re: [pfSense Support] OpenNTP offset sync

2010-09-07 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Karl Fife karlf...@gmail.com wrote: We're running Embedded 1.2.3 on Soekris 5501. We ran into a funny situation last week where ntpd was failing to sync even though the stratum 1 ntp server was reachable, and the OpenNPT service was running.  pfSense offset

Re: [pfSense Support] OpenNTP offset sync

2010-09-07 Thread RB
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:05, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote: While it generally works, openntpd tends to do stupid things at times and has a number of limitations. We've been discussing alternatives recently, looks like we'll switch back to the stock ntpd for 2.0. One time guru