On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:27:18PM -0700, Jeppe Øland wrote:
Don't take SSDs for granted.
When they fail, they *really* fail.
Yes, I've had my share of total failures with Intel.
This is why I have two firewalls (though not configured
at a cluster due to lack of time, in fact at the moment
the
On 10/15/10 8:12 PM, li...@mgreg.com wrote:
Hi All,
Having a bit of a problem wrapping my head around a particular network setup.
Basically the scenario is as follows:
-- 1 ISP (Cable Internet Provider)
-- 5 Available static IPs
-- 1 Cable Modem
-- 1 Generic PC with 2 NICs (running
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:49:55PM -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote:
This is getting interesting, someone on the list mentions that 2.5
drives are not reliable for 24x7x365 situations - so are you using a
This is not about the form factor, but how the drive is rated.
In fact, most enterprise
Hi,
Op 16 okt 2010, om 03:49 heeft Mehma Sarja het volgende geschreven:
This is getting interesting, someone on the list mentions that 2.5 drives
are not reliable for 24x7x365 situations - so are you using a 3.5 drive? My
setup is at home as well and it is just not fan noise - we see MUCH
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:07:04PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
There are arguments back and forth about the use of notebook drives 24x7.
While running hot. Under vibration load.
They are designed to withstand shocks, most of the time the disk head is
parked instead of flying over the platter.
On 10/16/2010 6:07 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
Hi,
Op 16 okt 2010, om 03:49 heeft Mehma Sarja het volgende geschreven:
This is getting interesting, someone on the list mentions that 2.5 drives
are not reliable for 24x7x365 situations - so are you using a 3.5 drive? My
setup is at home as well and
li...@mgreg.com wrote:
Hi All,
Having a bit of a problem wrapping my head around a particular network setup.
Basically the scenario is as follows:
-- 1 ISP (Cable Internet Provider)
-- 5 Available static IPs
-- 1 Cable Modem
-- 1 Generic PC with 2 NICs (running pfSense)
-- 1 Gigabit
does anyone now a US based vendor for these items?
On Oct 16, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
Hi,
Op 16 okt 2010, om 03:49 heeft Mehma Sarja het volgende geschreven:
This is getting interesting, someone on the list mentions that 2.5 drives
are not reliable for 24x7x365 situations - so
US Vendors for fanless/ssd: $208 mb + $79 case + $90 ssd intel 40 GB +
$83 4 GB mem = $460
* mother board - Supermicro MBD-X7SPA-HF-O,
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813182234
* case - M350 SILVER Enclosure, WITH PICOPSU-80 and 60W ADAPTER KIT,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Mehma Sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com wrote:
US Vendors for fanless/ssd: $208 mb + $79 case + $90 ssd intel 40 GB +
$83 4 GB mem = $460
* mother board - Supermicro MBD-X7SPA-HF-O,
You probably only want the X7SPA-H since you won't need the Matrox GFX
card (the
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
There are lots and lots and lots of Atom based motherboards
Lots of choices listed here:
http://www.linuxtech.net/features/intel_atom_pineview_motherboards_overview.html
Regards,
-Jeppe
On 10/16/10 12:54 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Mehma Sarjamehmasa...@gmail.com wrote.
[snip]
* mother board - Supermicro MBD-X7SPA-HF-O,
You probably only want the X7SPA-H since you won't need the Matrox GFX
Ok, so a savings of 44 on the mb
There
Is there a way to craft a rule that is specific to anything outbound on the WAN
interface only? I would imagine an alias of all internal networks, then a 'Not'
rule, but is my only option, I just don't like the fact that list has to be
manually
updated or it leaves a hole.
Thanks,
jlc
From: jcas...@activenetwerx.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:13:06 +
Subject: [pfSense Support] interface shorthand
Is there a way to craft a rule that is specific to anything outbound on the
WAN
interface only? I would imagine an alias of all internal
From: li...@mgreg.com
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:47:51 -0400
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Routing Multiple Static IPs
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Lyle Giese wrote:
li...@mgreg.com wrote:
Hi All,
Having a bit of a problem wrapping my head around a
If you only have LAN and WAN interfaces then you should just be able to define
the rule on the LAN interface.
If you have more interfaces than that then someone smarter than me will have
to answer it. :)
Hah. yeah I have 5 physical and several vlan based.
jlc
16 matches
Mail list logo
